Evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy and skin safety of a novel color additive in combination with chlorine disinfectants.

OBJECTIVE: A novel color additive colorizes chlorine disinfectants blue to improve visibility and enhance spray surface coverage, and it fades to colorless to indicate elapsed contact time. We investigated its interactions with 3 chlorine disinfectants to determine if the additive would adversely affect the disinfectants' antimicrobial efficacy or skin safety.
METHODS: We tested 0.5% sodium hypochlorite, 0.2% calcium hypochlorite, and 0.5% sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC) alone versus with color additive. An independent laboratory tested efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Vibrio cholerae, and human coronavirus 229E. An independent laboratory also tested direct skin irritation.
RESULTS: Chlorine disinfectants with and without color additive achieved equal levels of efficacy against the tested pathogens. Against S. aureus, 0.5% sodium hypochlorite with and without color additive met Environmental Protection Agency criteria for disinfection success. Against human coronavirus 229E, 0.5% sodium hypochlorite alone failed disinfection success criteria, whereas 0.5% sodium hypochlorite with color additive achieved full viral inactivation (≥4.50 log10 reduction). Against V. cholerae, 0.2% calcium hypochlorite alone and with color additive achieved 5.99 log10 and >6.03 log10 reductions, respectively. Against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa, 0.5% NaDCC with and without color additive achieved >4.9 log10 and >3.54 log10 reductions, respectively. All 3 chlorine disinfectants with color additive tested as negligible skin irritants.
CONCLUSIONS: This color additive can be combined with chlorine disinfectants without adversely affecting antimicrobial efficacy or skin safety.

Environmental surface cleaning is a key tenet of infection prevention programs, and its proper execution has been shown to reduce healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). However, current disinfection practices often fail because of human error, lack of protocol compliance, and the difficulty of monitoring cleaning techniques. Furthermore, the optimal use of disinfectants in accordance with manufacturer guidelines is typically infeasible in real-world settings, as spray disinfectants have been shown to cover less than 33% of a surface or evaporate in less than 2 minutes, without reaching required wet-contact times.3, 4, 5

These shortfalls severely limit the effectiveness of environmental surface cleaning as an infection prevention strategy. Less than 50% of high-touch surfaces in healthcare facilities are properly cleaned. One study found that despite housekeepers being instructed to use 10% bleach to clean rooms with Clostridium difficile-infected patients, 78% of these rooms still tested positive for C. difficile after terminal cleaning. There is a consensus that improving compliance with disinfection protocols and techniques is critical to reducing HAIs.2, 7, 8, 9

A novel color additive, Highlight® (Kinnos Inc, Brooklyn, New York), colorizes chlorine disinfectants blue to allow for improved visibility and thoroughness of application. Upon spraying on a surface, chlorine disinfectants with the color additive fade from blue to colorless to indicate when the proper contact time has been met. They also exhibit lowered surface tension that improves spray surface coverage to >99.9%.4, 10 This novel additive addresses the major shortfalls of environmental cleaning by ensuring compliance with wet-contact time, improving coverage of sprayed surfaces, and providing real-time ability to monitor cleaning techniques.

This color additive is considered an adjuvant under U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines and does not require registration as a pesticide. However, given the novel nature of this product, it is important to demonstrate that its addition to chlorine disinfectants does not compromise antimicrobial efficacy or pose any safety risks. We evaluated the effect of color additive on the antimicrobial efficacy and skin safety of 3 major chlorine disinfectants: 0.5% sodium hypochlorite, 0.2% calcium hypochlorite and 0.5% sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC). This study presents the efficacy test results of an independent Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)-compliant facility against Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Vibrio cholerae, and human coronavirus 229E. This study also presents results from another independent GLP-compliant laboratory that tested skin irritation from chlorine disinfectants with and without color additive. Our results confirm that when added to chlorine disinfectants, the color additive does not reduce antimicrobial efficacy or cause skin irritation.

METHODS

An independent GLP-compliant facility, Microchem Laboratory (Round Rock, Texas), performed efficacy tests in accordance with test methods established by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) and the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), as outlined in Table 1 . Another independent GLP-compliant facility, Toxikon Corporation (Bedford, Massachusetts), performed skin irritation studies in accordance with test methods established by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). The same batches of commercially produced chlorine disinfectants were tested with or without the addition of the Highlight® color additive to directly compare efficacy and skin safety results. Detailed test methods used in these studies are detailed in Appendix 1.

Table 1

Overview of efficacy test methodology and organisms for 3 chlorine disinfectants with and without color additive

Test Substances	Test Organisms	Contact Time	Test Method	Study ID Number
0.5% sodium hypochlorite vs. 0.5% sodium hypochlorite with color additive	Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538)	10 min ± 5 sec	AOAC 961.02	GLP1540+GLP1550
	Human coronavirus 229E (ATCC VR-740)	10 min ± 5 sec	ASTM E1053	GLP1536+GLP1538
	Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 15442)	5 min ± 5 sec	ASTM E1153	NG8698*
0.2% calcium hypochlorite vs. 0.2% calcium hypochlorite with color additive	Vibrio cholerae (ATCC 39050)	3 min ± 5 sec	ASTM E2315	NG8285
	Vibrio cholerae (ATCC 39050)	3 min ± 5 sec	ASTM E2315	NG9676*
	Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 15442)	5 min ± 5 sec	ASTM E1153	NG8698*
0.5% NaDCC control vs. 0.5% NaDCC with color additive	Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538)	5 min ± 5 sec	ASTM E1153	NG8156
	Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 15442)	5 min ± 5 sec	ASTM E1153	NG8156
	Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 15442)	5 min ± 5 sec	ASTM E1153	NG9375*

NaDCC = sodium dichloroisocyanurate.

Studies in which the test substances were prepared and left at room temperature for four hours prior to efficacy testing.

Efficacy test against S. aureus using AOAC method 961.02

This study was conducted using a previously described protocol, AOAC 961.02.12, 13, 14 Three lots of 0.5% sodium hypochlorite were tested against S. aureus (ATCC 6538) at the contact time of 10 minutes, based on the label claims of a common household bleach. First, 0.5% sodium hypochlorite was prepared by diluting regular bleach (Clorox, Oakland, California) in sterile AOAC hard water. This study was repeated using 3 lots of the color additive mixed into the same lots of 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution immediately before testing. Next, 60 carriers inoculated with dried S. aureus were sprayed with the test substance and left undisturbed for a contact time of 10 minutes ± 5 seconds. After neutralization, the carriers were transferred into tubes and assessed for growth.

Efficacy test against human coronavirus 229E using ASTM method E1053

This study was conducted using a previously described protocol, ASTM E1053.16, 17, 18 Two lots of 0.5% sodium hypochlorite were tested against human coronavirus strain 229E (ATCC VR-740) at the contact time of 10 minutes, based on the label claims of a common household bleach. This test was repeated using the same lots of 0.5% sodium hypochlorite mixed with 2 lots of the color additive. Carriers of dried human coronavirus 229E film were sprayed with the test substance and left undisturbed for 10 minutes ± 5 seconds, then neutralized and filtered. Serial 10-fold dilutions of the resultant filtrate were then prepared and applied in quadruplicate to multi-well plates containing normal lung fibroblast cell monolayers. After incubation, each well was examined for cytopathic effects indicating infectious virus. The Spearman-Karber method was used to quantify the amount of infectious virus recovered.

Efficacy test against V. cholerae using ASTM method E2315

A suspension efficacy test was performed using a previously described protocol, ASTM E2315.19, 20, 21 Calcium hypochlorite was tested against V. cholerae (ATCC 39050) with a 0.2% concentration based on World Health Organization and U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cholera guidelines and a contact time of 3 minutes, based on the standard practices of a nongovernmental organization that field-tested the color additive during the 2017 Haiti outbreak.22, 23, 24 The suspension test method is commonly used for efficacy testing against pathogens like V. cholerae that cannot survive the drying phase of standard hard surface tests.

For study NG8285, 0.2% calcium hypochlorite was prepared by dissolving 68% Calcium Hypochlorite Granular (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) in AOAC hard water immediately before efficacy testing. This test was repeated using the same lot of 0.2% calcium hypochlorite combined with color additive. For study NG9676, both test substances were prepared and allowed to rest at room temperature for 4 hours before testing to determine if the color additive affected antimicrobial efficacy of 0.2% calcium hypochlorite over time. Ten mL of test substance was inoculated with 0.5 mL of V. cholerae culture for 3 minutes, neutralized, then plated and enumerated for colony-forming units (CFU) to determine log reduction after exposure.

Efficacy tests against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa using ASTM method E1153

This study was conducted using a previously established protocol, ASTM E1153.26, 27, 28, 29 In study NG8156, 0.5% NaDCC was tested against both S. aureus and P. aeruginosa (ATCC 15442) with a contact time of 5 minutes, based on the label claims of an existing 0.5% chlorine NaDCC disinfectant. This test was repeated using the same lot of 0.5% NaDCC with the addition of color additive. 0.5% NaDCC was prepared by dissolving OASIS NaDCC Granules (Hydrachem, West Sussex, United Kingdom) in sterile AOAC hard water.

In study NG8698, 4 test substances were prepared (0.5% sodium hypochlorite and 0.2% calcium hypochlorite, both with and without color additive) and allowed to rest at room temperature for 4 hours. Then, efficacy testing against P. aeruginosa was conducted with a contact time of 5 minutes to determine if prolonged exposure to the color additive interfered with the ability of these chlorine solutions to meet the ASTM E1153 passing criteria of >3 log10 reduction. Similarly, in study NG9375, 0.5% NaDCC solutions with and without color additive were prepared, allowed to rest at room temperature for 4 hours, then tested against P. aeruginosa with a contact time of 5 minutes. Test carriers inoculated with dried pathogen were sprayed with the test substance, neutralized, then plated and enumerated to determine log reduction after exposure.

Direct primary skin irritation test using ISO 10993-10

We evaluated the potential for 6 test substances (0.5% sodium hypochlorite, 0.5% calcium hypochlorite, and 0.5% NaDCC either alone or in combination with their formula of the color additive) to produce primary dermal irritation after 4 hours of direct exposure. An independent GLP-compliant facility, Toxikon Corporation, performed these studies in accordance with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-recognized test methods established by the ISO.31, 32

Three New Zealand white rabbits for each test substance were acclimatized for a minimum of 5 days before treatment. Then, 0.5 mL of test substance was applied directly to 2 test sites per animal, which were then bandaged. Two control sites per animal were left untreated and bandaged in the same manner as the test sites. After 4 hours, the dressings were removed and sites observed for signs of erythema and edema after 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours. Signs of erythema and edema were both scored from 0 to 4. The final Primary Irritation Index (PII) of each test substance was determined by summing erythema and edema scores and averaging across time points (3), number of test sites (2), and number of animals (3).

RESULTS

Effect of color additive on 0.5% sodium hypochlorite efficacy against S. aureus using AOAC 961.02

Table 2 shows the results of studies GLP1540 and GLP1550, in which 0.5% sodium hypochlorite was tested alone and in combination with color additive against S. aureus at a contact time of 10 minutes. To pass EPA performance criteria for successful disinfection, 3 lots of the test substance must be tested, with at least 59 of the 60 test carriers for each lot confirmed negative for any surviving S. aureus. Three lots of 0.5% sodium hypochlorite successfully disinfected 60, 60, and 59 of the 60 carriers. Three lots of 0.5% sodium hypochlorite with color additive successfully disinfected 60, 60, and 59 of the 60 carriers. Both met EPA efficacy performance guidelines.

Table 2

Study GLP1540 & GLP1550: efficacy of 0.5% sodium hypochlorite with and without color additive against S. aureus after 10 minutes ± 5 seconds contact time

Test substance	Lot number	Test organism	Number of carriers			Carriers disinfected
			Treated	Showing growth	Confirmed as test organism
0.5% sodium hypochlorite	E616050	S. aureus (ATCC 6538)	60	0	0	60/60
	E616060		60	1	0	60/60
	E615306		60	1	1	59/60
0.5% sodium hypochlorite with color additive	3-16-HLTS1	S. aureus (ATCC 6538)	60	0	0	60/60
	3-16-HLTS2		60	0	0	60/60
	3-16-HLTS3		60	1	1	59/60

Effect of color additive on 0.5% sodium hypochlorite efficacy against human coronavirus 229E using ASTM E1053

Table 3 and Table 4 show the results of studies GLP1538 and GLP1536, in which 0.5% sodium hypochlorite was tested alone and in combination with color additive against human coronavirus 229E at a contact time of 10 minutes. To pass EPA performance criteria for virucidal efficacy, test substances must demonstrate complete inactivation of the virus at all dilutions.

Table 3

Study GLP1538: efficacy of 0.5% sodium hypochlorite after 10 minutes ± 5 seconds contact time to human coronavirus strain 229E dried on inanimate surface

					0.5% sodium hypochlorite: Lot E616050				0.5% sodium hypochlorite: Lot E616060
Dilution	Dried Virus Plate Recovery Control				Human Coronavirus 229E Test Film				Human Coronavirus 229E Test Film
10−1	+	+	+	+	+	O	O	O	O	O	O	O
10−2	+	+	+	+	O	O	O	O	O	O	O	O
10−3	+	+	+	O	O	O	O	O	O	O	O	O
10−4	+	O	O	+	O	O	O	O	O	O	O	O
10−5	O	O	O	O	O	O	O	O	O	O	O	O
10−6	O	O	O	O	O	O	O	O	O	O	O	O
TCID50/1.0 mL	3.75 log10				0.75 log10				≤0.50 log10
TCID50/carrier	4.35 log10				1.35 log10				≤1.10 log10
Reduction of virus due to inactivation by test substance:					3.00 log10				≥3.25 log10

Recovery of 229E virus (+) or absence of 229E virus and cytotoxicity (O) in wells containing MRC-5 host cells. 229E virus (200 µL) was previously dried on an inanimate surface, treated with a control media or test substance, neutralized and filtered, and then serially diluted in quadruplicate.

Table 4

Study GLP1536: efficacy of 0.5% sodium hypochlorite with color additive after 10 minutes ± 5 seconds contact time to human coronavirus strain 229E dried on inanimate surface

					Color additive: Lot HLT 3-16-HLTS1				Color additive: Lot HLT 3-16-HLTS1
					0.5% sodium hypochlorite: Lot E616050				0.5% sodium hypochlorite: Lot E616060
Dilution	Dried Virus Plate Recovery Control				Human Coronavirus 229E Test Film				Human Coronavirus 229E Test Film
10−1	+	+	+	+	O	O	O	O	O	O	O	O
10−2	+	+	+	+	O	O	O	O	O	O	O	O
10−3	+	+	+	O	O	O	O	O	O	O	O	O
10−4	+	O	+	+	O	O	O	O	O	O	O	O
10−5	O	O	O	+	O	O	O	O	O	O	O	O
10−6	O	O	+	+	O	O	O	O	O	O	O	O
TCID50/1.0 mL	5.00 log10				≤0.50 log10				≤0.50 log10
TCID50/carrier	5.60 log10				≤1.10 log10				≤1.10 log10
Reduction of virus due to inactivation by test substance:					≥4.50 log10				≥4.50 log10

Recovery of 229E virus (+), or absence of both 229E virus and cytotoxicity (O) in wells containing MRC-5 host cells. 229E virus (200 µL) was previously dried on an inanimate surface, treated with a control media or test substance, neutralized and filtered, and then serially diluted in quadruplicate.

The 2 lots of 0.5% sodium hypochlorite alone demonstrated 3.00 log10 and ≥3.25 log10 reduction of virus, and infectious viral particles were recovered in 1 of the 10−1 dilution wells. The 2 lots of 0.5% sodium hypochlorite with color additive both demonstrated ≥4.50 log10 reduction of virus. Under these test conditions, the combination of 0.5% sodium hypochlorite with color additive completely inactivated human coronavirus 229E and met EPA performance criteria for virucidal efficacy, whereas 0.5% sodium hypochlorite alone failed the disinfection success criteria due to recovery of infectious viral particles from 1 lot.

Effect of color additive on 0.2% calcium hypochlorite efficacy against V. cholerae using ASTM E2315

Figure 1 shows the results of studies NG8285 and NG9679, in which 0.2% calcium hypochlorite was tested alone and in combination with color additive against V. cholerae at a contact time of 3 minutes. 0.2% calcium hypochlorite alone and with color additive were prepared immediately before efficacy testing and demonstrated 5.99 log10 and >6.03 log10 reduction of V. cholerae, respectively. For study NG9679, both test substances were prepared and allowed to rest at room temperature 4 hours before efficacy testing, and both demonstrated 6.58 log10 reduction.

Fig 1

Studies NG8285 and NG9676: log10 reduction of V. cholerae when treated with 0.2% calcium hypochlorite with and without color additive for 3 minutes ± 5 seconds. Test solutions were tested for efficacy either immediately or 4 hours after preparation.

Effect of color additive on 0.5% NaDCC efficacy against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus using ASTM E1153

Figure 2 shows the results of study NG8156, in which 0.5% NaDCC was tested alone and with color additive against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus at a contact time of 5 minutes. Against S. aureus, 0.5% NaDCC alone and with color additive both reduced the bacteria below detectable limits, with a reduction of >4.9 log10 (>99.9988%). Against P. aeruginosa, both test substances demonstrated >3.54 log10 (>99.97%) reduction. Overall, the efficacy results of 0.5% NaDCC with and without color additive both met ASTM passing criteria of >3 log10 reduction.

Fig 2

Study NG8156: efficacy of 0.5% NaDCC with and without color additive after 5 minutes ± 5 seconds contact time against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa. The ASTM E1153 passing criterion of 3 log10 reduction is represented by the dashed line.

Effect of color additive on chlorine disinfectant efficacy against P. aeruginosa after 4-hour resting time using ASTM E1153

Figure 3 shows the results of studies NG8698 and NG9375, in which 0.5% sodium hypochlorite, 0.2% calcium hypochlorite, and 0.5% NaDCC were prepared alone and in combination with their respective formulas of color additive, allowed to rest for 4 hours, then tested against P. aeruginosa using a contact time of 5 minutes. 0.5% sodium hypochlorite alone and with color additive achieved >4.1 log10 (>99.992%) and 3.8 log10 (99.98%) reduction, respectively. 0.2% calcium hypochlorite alone and with color additive both demonstrated 3.8 log10 (99.98%) reduction. 0.5% NaDCC alone and with color additive both achieved >4.34 log10 (>99.995%) reduction. Overall, the addition of color additive to all 3 chlorine solutions did not affect their ability to achieve the ASTM-required >3 log10 reduction, even after prolonged resting time.

Fig 3

Studies NG8698 and NG9375: efficacy of chlorine disinfectants with and without color additive after 5 minutes ± 5 seconds contact time against P. aeruginosa, when prepared and allowed to rest 4 hours in advance of efficacy testing. The ASTM E1153 passing criterion of 3 log10 reduction is represented by the dashed line.

Skin irritation profile of chlorine disinfectants with and without color additive

Table 5 shows the results of direct primary skin irritation tests performed on rabbits using the 3 chlorine disinfectants alone or with color additive. The PII is a quantitative evaluation of the ability of a test substance to provoke inflammatory response in the skin and is determined based on triplicate testing of animals on 2 test sites through 3 time points. Any PII score above 0 indicates that erythema or edema occurred at least once during the observation period. Based on FDA evaluation criteria, test substances with a PII score of less than 0.5 are considered negligible irritants; a PII score of 0.5-<2.0 indicates a slight irritant; and a PII score of 2.0-<5.0 indicates a moderate irritant. Substances with a PII score of >5.0 are considered severe irritants.

Table 5

Skin irritation testing: erythema and edema irritation scores of individual rabbits after 4-hour substance exposure

Test substance	Animal no.	Primary Irritation Index (PII) score (erythema/edema)*								Final PII‡
		1 hour†		24 hours		48 hours		72 hours
		Test site 1	Test site 2	Test site 1	Test site 2	Test site 1	Test site 2	Test site 1	Test site 2
0.5% sodium hypochlorite	60135	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0
	60136	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0.0
	60137	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0
0.5% sodium hypochlorite + color additive	60073	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0
	60074	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0.0
	60075	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0
0.5% calcium hypochlorite	60615	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0
	60616	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0.1
	60617	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	2/0	0/0
0.5% calcium hypochlorite + color additive	60612	1/0	1/0	1/0	1/0	1/0	1/0	0/0	0/0
	60613	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0.2
	60614	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0
0.5% NaDCC	60702	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0
	60704	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0.0
	60706	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0
0.5% NaDCC +  color additive	60696	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0
	60698	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0.0
	60700	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0

NaDCC = sodium dichloroisocyanurate.

All readings were taken after the dressing removal.

1-hour scores are not included in determining PII.

PII = sum of (erythema + edema scores) / (2 test sites x 3 observation points) for each animal / 3 animals.

No signs of erythema or edema were found on any of the untreated bandaged control sites for every animal. 0.5% sodium hypochlorite alone or with color additive and 0.5% NaDCC alone or with color additive produced no signs of erythema or edema on any animal, thus yielding a PII score of 0. For 0.5% calcium hypochlorite alone, a small area of moderate erythema (score of 2) was found on Test Site 1 of Animal 60617 at the 72-hour time point, yielding a final PII score of 0.1 when averaged across all animals and test sites. For 0.5% calcium hypochlorite in combination with color additive, 1 rabbit (Animal 60612) was observed with slight erythema (score of 1) on both test sites at the 1-, 24-, and 48-hour time points, yielding a final PII score of 0.2. All test substances yielded PII scores of below 0.5 and were considered negligible irritants.

DISCUSSION

Efficacy testing performed by an independent GLP-compliant laboratory confirmed across a variety of test methods and pathogens that the addition of the color additive did not adversely affect the antimicrobial efficacy of 3 major chlorine disinfectants. In these studies, chlorine disinfectants with color additive achieved the same level of disinfection as the chlorine disinfectants alone and passed different efficacy criteria established by EPA and ASTM guidelines.

Both 0.5% sodium hypochlorite with and without color additive met EPA criteria for disinfection of S. aureus at a 10-minute contact time. 0.5% sodium hypochlorite combined with color additive also fully inactivated human coronavirus 229E after a 10-minute contact time. Interestingly, 0.5% sodium hypochlorite alone failed due to recovery of infectious viral particles in 1 of the lots. This result may have been due to factors such as inconsistencies in spray application and coverage between lots. Given the design of this study, in which a plate of dried virus film was sprayed with the disinfectant, it is possible that the surface coverage-improving properties of the color additive contributed to improved efficacy compared to 0.5% sodium hypochlorite alone, which tends to bead up and form droplets when sprayed. A recent study demonstrated that typical bleach disinfectants cover <33% of a sprayed surface and lose coverage over the duration of the contact time, whereas the addition of color additive improved bleach surface coverage to >99.9% and maintained this level of coverage for 15 minutes. When used in real-world settings, this color additive may maximize the efficacy of bleach disinfectants due to superior spray coverage.

Both 0.2% calcium hypochlorite with and without color additive demonstrated equal efficacy against V. cholerae, achieving >6.03 log10 and 5.99 log10 reduction. Also, 0.5% NaDCC with and without color additive were equally efficacious against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa after a contact time of 5 minutes, passing the ASTM criteria for disinfection success of >3.00 log10 reduction.

We were interested to see if chlorine solutions remained efficacious when combined with the color additive for a prolonged period of time, given that its blue coloration is stable for 4–6 hours in bulk solution. We therefore conducted studies in which chlorine disinfectants were prepared with or without the color additive and allowed to rest at room temperature for 4 hours before efficacy testing. After the resting period, all 3 chlorine disinfectants, with and without color additive, met the ASTM criteria of >3.00 log10 reduction for disinfection success against P. aeruginosa after a contact time of 5 minutes. Although disposal of the chlorine solutions is recommended once the blue color has faded, additional testing is warranted on the effect of the color additive on long-term shelf-life.

Evaluating the skin safety of the color additive in combination with chlorine disinfectants was a major priority, given the risk of occupational exposure to disinfectants and skin diseases in healthcare personnel.34, 35, 36 An independent GLP-compliant facility conducted direct primary skin irritation studies on all 3 chlorine disinfectants with and without color additive and found all to be negligible irritants. Thus, the addition of color additive to chlorine disinfectants does not increase their potential to cause skin irritation.

While the adoption of multifaceted infection prevention programs has helped combat HAIs, significant work remains to be done to ensure the proper execution of standard prevention practices. Environmental surface cleaning is a critical component of these programs, but there is a consensus that current cleaning and disinfection practices are suboptimal.1, 2, 3 Lack of adherence to protocol and poor techniques can be mitigated with careful monitoring and educational interventions. One study detailing the successful reduction of C. difficile contamination from 78% to 11% concluded that environmental cleaning interventions should provide a way to both monitor cleaning techniques and provide feedback to housekeeping staff. However, these monitoring programs are difficult to enforce and sustain given that housekeeper turnover reaches up to 50% in some facilities.38, 39

The color-fading properties of the color additive allow it to function as a visible, real-time feedback mechanism for thoroughness of cleaning and adherence to wet-contact times. One recent study found that healthcare personnel were more successful in correctly identifying surfaces that had been sprayed with bleach if the color additive had been added. Another study demonstrated that the color additive improved the surface coverage properties of bleach sprays from <33% to >99.9%. We recently found that workers at Ebola treatment units in Liberia and Guinea reported increased coverage and confidence of disinfection when combining the color additive with their currently used chlorine solutions. Although this color additive is suggested for use only on hard, nonporous surfaces, as is similarly recommended for chlorine disinfectants, it has potential applications in other settings like veterinarian clinics, food sanitation, and forensic restoration.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided a comprehensive evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy and skin safety profile of chlorine solutions in combination with this color additive. In conjunction with data from a recent study showing that the color additive did not adversely affect the efficacy of commercial bleach against C. difficile spores, our study demonstrated that this color additive is highly compatible with chlorine disinfectants. This novel color additive could play a significant role in improving cleaning compliance and environmental surface disinfection, and further studies on its ability to enhance cleaning practices in healthcare settings are warranted.