Suleyman Sezai Yıldız1, Kudret Keskin1, Murat Avsar2, Gokhan Cetinkal1, Serhat Sigirci1, Gokhan Aksan1, Sukru Cetin1, Ertugrul Okuyan3, Kadriye Orta Kilickesmez1. 1. Department of Cardiology, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey. 2. Department of Cardiology, Yedikule Chest Disease and Thoracic Surgery Training Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey. 3. Department of Cardiology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with atrial myocardial infarction (ATMI) have frequent cardiac and noncardiac complications. However, ATMI is uncommonly diagnosed because of its nonspecific ECG changes. Our objective was to analyze the ECG characteristics of ATMI in patients with inferior STEMI. HYPOTHESIS: Electrocardiographic P wave parameters can help in diagnosis of ATMI. METHODS: We evaluated 932 patients who underwent coronary angiography and recruited 39 patients with ATMI and 33 patients without ATMI with inferior STEMI for a retrospective study. Twelve-lead ECGs were obtained to measure P-wave parameters in diagnosis of ATMI. P-wave parameters and PR-segment displacement were compared in patients with and without ATMI. RESULTS: In inferior leads, PWD and PWDisp were significantly longer in the ATMI group than in the non-ATMI group (limb lead II, 109.79 ±15.51 ms and 86.65 ±5.02 ms, respectively; P < 0.001; limb lead III, 108.31 ±12.51 ms and 85.27 ±7.47 ms, P < 0.001; aVF, 106.49 ±13.68 ms and 83.01 ±7.89 ms, P < 0.001; PWDisp, 41.67 ±10.72 ms and 25.18 ±5.17 ms, P < 0.001). By contrast, PWA was significantly lower in the ATMI group than in the non-ATMI group (limb lead II, 0.96 ±0.18 mV and 1.39 ±0.22 mV, respectively; P < 0.001; limb lead III, 0.90 ±0.11 and 1.21 ±0.23, P < 0.001; aVF, 0.88 ±0.17 and 1.26 ±0.28, P < 0.001). PR-segment displacement was found in 8 (20.5%) patients with ATMI. A PWD ≥95.5 ms in lead DII diagnosed ATMI with a higher sensitivity and specificity (90%, 94%) than did PWA or PWDisp. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests P-wave parameters might be considered ECG findings in diagnosis of ATMI in patients with inferior STEMI.
BACKGROUND:Patients with atrial myocardial infarction (ATMI) have frequent cardiac and noncardiac complications. However, ATMI is uncommonly diagnosed because of its nonspecific ECG changes. Our objective was to analyze the ECG characteristics of ATMI in patients with inferior STEMI. HYPOTHESIS: Electrocardiographic P wave parameters can help in diagnosis of ATMI. METHODS: We evaluated 932 patients who underwent coronary angiography and recruited 39 patients with ATMI and 33 patients without ATMI with inferior STEMI for a retrospective study. Twelve-lead ECGs were obtained to measure P-wave parameters in diagnosis of ATMI. P-wave parameters and PR-segment displacement were compared in patients with and without ATMI. RESULTS: In inferior leads, PWD and PWDisp were significantly longer in the ATMI group than in the non-ATMI group (limb lead II, 109.79 ±15.51 ms and 86.65 ±5.02 ms, respectively; P < 0.001; limb lead III, 108.31 ±12.51 ms and 85.27 ±7.47 ms, P < 0.001; aVF, 106.49 ±13.68 ms and 83.01 ±7.89 ms, P < 0.001; PWDisp, 41.67 ±10.72 ms and 25.18 ±5.17 ms, P < 0.001). By contrast, PWA was significantly lower in the ATMI group than in the non-ATMI group (limb lead II, 0.96 ±0.18 mV and 1.39 ±0.22 mV, respectively; P < 0.001; limb lead III, 0.90 ±0.11 and 1.21 ±0.23, P < 0.001; aVF, 0.88 ±0.17 and 1.26 ±0.28, P < 0.001). PR-segment displacement was found in 8 (20.5%) patients with ATMI. A PWD ≥95.5 ms in lead DII diagnosed ATMI with a higher sensitivity and specificity (90%, 94%) than did PWA or PWDisp. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests P-wave parameters might be considered ECG findings in diagnosis of ATMI in patients with inferior STEMI.