Literature DB >> 29802671

Timing of repetition suppression of event-related potentials to unattended objects.

Gabor Stefanics1,2, Jakob Heinzle1, István Czigler3, Elia Valentini4, Klaas E Stephan1,5.   

Abstract

Current theories of object perception emphasize the automatic nature of perceptual inference. Repetition suppression (RS), the successive decrease of brain responses to repeated stimuli, is thought to reflect the optimization of perceptual inference through neural plasticity. While functional imaging studies revealed brain regions that show suppressed responses to the repeated presentation of an object, little is known about the intra-trial time course of repetition effects to everyday objects. Here, we used event-related potentials (ERPs) to task-irrelevant line-drawn objects, while participants engaged in a distractor task. We quantified changes in ERPs over repetitions using three general linear models that modeled RS by an exponential, linear, or categorical "change detection" function in each subject. Our aim was to select the model with highest evidence and determine the within-trial time-course and scalp distribution of repetition effects using that model. Model comparison revealed the superiority of the exponential model indicating that repetition effects are observable for trials beyond the first repetition. Model parameter estimates revealed a sequence of RS effects in three time windows (86-140, 322-360, and 400-446 ms) and with occipital, temporoparietal, and frontotemporal distribution, respectively. An interval of repetition enhancement (RE) was also observed (320-340 ms) over occipitotemporal sensors. Our results show that automatic processing of task-irrelevant objects involves multiple intervals of RS with distinct scalp topographies. These sequential intervals of RS and RE might reflect the short-term plasticity required for optimization of perceptual inference and the associated changes in prediction errors and predictions, respectively, over stimulus repetitions during automatic object processing.
© 2018 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  event-related potential; general linear modeling; object recognition; predictive coding; repetition enhancement

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29802671      PMCID: PMC7818225          DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  72 in total

Review 1.  Glutamatergic model psychoses: prediction error, learning, and inference.

Authors:  Philip R Corlett; Garry D Honey; John H Krystal; Paul C Fletcher
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 2.  Visual adaptation: neural, psychological and computational aspects.

Authors:  Colin W G Clifford; Michael A Webster; Garrett B Stanley; Alan A Stocker; Adam Kohn; Tatyana O Sharpee; Odelia Schwartz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals.

Authors:  Bart Krekelberg; Geoffrey M Boynton; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies.

Authors:  Anna Szekely; Thomas Jacobsen; Simona D'Amico; Antonella Devescovi; Elena Andonova; Daniel Herron; Ching Ching Lu; Thomas Pechmann; Csaba Pléh; Nicole Wicha; Kara Federmeier; Irina Gerdjikova; Gabriel Gutierrez; Daisy Hung; Jeanne Hsu; Gowri Iyer; Kathryn Kohnert; Teodora Mehotcheva; Araceli Orozco-Figueroa; Angela Tzeng; Ovid Tzeng; Analía Arévalo; Andras Vargha; Andrew C Butler; Robert Buffington; Elizabeth Bates
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Free energy, precision and learning: the role of cholinergic neuromodulation.

Authors:  Rosalyn J Moran; Pablo Campo; Mkael Symmonds; Klaas E Stephan; Raymond J Dolan; Karl J Friston
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Neurons in macaque inferior temporal cortex show no surprise response to deviants in visual oddball sequences.

Authors:  Dzmitry A Kaliukhovich; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Visual adaptation and novelty responses in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  Susan E Boehnke; David J Berg; Robert A Marino; Pierre F Baldi; Laurent Itti; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  EEG and MEG data analysis in SPM8.

Authors:  Vladimir Litvak; Jérémie Mattout; Stefan Kiebel; Christophe Phillips; Richard Henson; James Kilner; Gareth Barnes; Robert Oostenveld; Jean Daunizeau; Guillaume Flandin; Will Penny; Karl Friston
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-06

9.  Attentional Enhancement of Auditory Mismatch Responses: a DCM/MEG Study.

Authors:  Ryszard Auksztulewicz; Karl Friston
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Electrophysiological correlates of masked face priming.

Authors:  R N Henson; E Mouchlianitis; W J Matthews; S Kouider
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  5 in total

1.  Individuals with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome show intact prediction but reduced adaptation in responses to repeated sounds: Evidence from Bayesian mapping.

Authors:  Kit Melissa Larsen; Morten Mørup; Michelle Rosgaard Birknow; Elvira Fischer; Line Olsen; Michael Didriksen; William Frans Christiaan Baaré; Thomas Mears Werge; Marta Isabel Garrido; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 4.881

2.  Timing of repetition suppression of event-related potentials to unattended objects.

Authors:  Gabor Stefanics; Jakob Heinzle; István Czigler; Elia Valentini; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Visual Mismatch Negativity Reflects Enhanced Response to the Deviant: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials and Electroencephalogram Time-Frequency Analysis.

Authors:  Xianqing Zeng; Luyan Ji; Yanxiu Liu; Yue Zhang; Shimin Fu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Dynamics of Oddball Sound Processing: Trial-by-Trial Modeling of ECoG Signals.

Authors:  Françoise Lecaignard; Raphaëlle Bertrand; Peter Brunner; Anne Caclin; Gerwin Schalk; Jérémie Mattout
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Object recognition is enabled by an experience-dependent appraisal of visual features in the brain's value system.

Authors:  Vladimir V Kozunov; Timothy O West; Anastasia Y Nikolaeva; Tatiana A Stroganova; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 6.556

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.