| Literature DB >> 29802531 |
Benedikt J Schwaiger1, Alexandra S Gersing2, Johannes Hammel2, Kai Mei2, Felix K Kopp2, Jan S Kirschke3, Ernst J Rummeny2, Klaus Wörtler2, Thomas Baum3, Peter B Noël2,4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether bone marrow edema in patients with acute vertebral fractures can be accurately diagnosed based on three-material decomposition with dual-layer spectral CT (DLCT).Entities:
Keywords: Dual-layer spectral computed tomography; Osteoporosis; Spine; Vertebral fractures
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29802531 PMCID: PMC6153646 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-018-2981-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Skeletal Radiol ISSN: 0364-2348 Impact factor: 2.199
Fig. 1CT and MR images of a 67-year-old female patient admitted for acute back pain and history of osteopenia. Sagittal reformation equivalent to a conventional CT examination (a) reveals compression fractures of Th10 and 11 (arrowheads). Th11 presents a global increase in HU numbers possibly due to condensation, but no definite signs of an acute fracture are seen. Material-specific density maps for water (b), fat (c), and hydroxyapatite (d), and respective color-coded overlays (f, g, h) reveal an increase in water-specific density in the red-marrow map (b and f; arrow) and a decrease in fat-specific density in the yellow-marrow map (c and g; arrow) in Th11 compared to adjacent vertebral bodies, including Th10. The hydroxyapatite-specific map suggests a density increase in the lower endplate in Th11 (d and h). The sagittal fluid-sensitive fat-saturated STIR sequence from the subsequent MR examination confirms the presence of an edema-equivalent signal alteration in Th11, thus confirming an acute fracture (arrow), but not in Th10, thus confirming a chronic fracture (e)
Contingency table for the classification of vertebral fractures as acute vs. non-acute based on conventional CT images, dual-layer spectral CT images, and MR imaging as the standard of reference, displayed for two radiologists
| Radiologist 1 | ||||
| Considered acute on conventional CT | Considered acute on dual-layer spectral CT | |||
| Edema-like signal on MR imaging | Acute | Non-acute | Acute | Non-acute |
| Edema-like signal (acute; | 31 | 10 | 38 | 3 |
| No edema-like signal (non-acute; | 4 | 14 | 2 | 16 |
| Radiologist 2 | ||||
| Considered acute on conventional CT | Considered acute on dual-layer spectral CT | |||
| Edema-like signal on MR imaging | Acute | Non-acute | Acute | Non-acute |
| Edema-like signal (acute; | 30 | 11 | 39 | 2 |
| No edema-like signal (non-acute; | 3 | 15 | 2 | 16 |
Diagnostic performance of conventional and dual-layer spectral CT for the detection of acute vertebral fractures with MR imaging as standard-of-reference on the level of individual fractures (n = 59)
| Radiologist 1 | Radiologist 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Detection of acute fractures | Conventional CT | Dual-layer spectral CT | Conventional CT | Dual-layer spectral CT |
| Sensitivity | 0.76 | 0.93 | 0.73 | 0.95 |
| Specificity | 0.78 | 0.89 | 0.83 | 0.89 |
| Accuracy | 0.76 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 0.93 |
| Positive predictive value | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.95 |
| Negative predictive value | 0.58 | 0.84 | 0.58 | 0.89 |
Diagnostic performance of conventional and dual-layer spectral CT for the detection of at least one acute vertebral fractures with MR imaging as standard-of-reference on a patient level (n = 27; parameters are identical for radiologist 1 and 2)
| Detection of acute fractures | Conventional CT | Dual-layer spectral CT |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | 0.83 | 1 |
| Specificity | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| Accuracy | 0.81 | 0.96 |
| Positive predictive value | 0.95 | 0.96 |
| Negative predictive value | 0.43 | 1 |
Fig. 2CT and MR images of exemplary false-positive (a–d) and false-negative (e–h) classifications based on dual-layer spectral CT imaging. The L4 endplate fracture in a 73-year-old male patient with acute back pain (a) was considered acute based on a water-specific density increase ventrally in the vertebral body (b; arrow) and fat-specific density decrease (d; arrow); however, the fat-saturated fluid-sensitive STIR sequence (c) reveals no edema-equivalent signal alteration. The Th8 compression fracture in a 72-year-old female patient with acute back pain and known osteopenia (e) was considered chronic due to absent definite water- and fat-specific density changes in comparison to the adjacent vertebral bodies (f and h; arrows); however, the STIR sequence revealed an extensive edema-equivalent signal alteration indicating an acute fracture