Eric Goralnick1, Muhammad A Chaudhary2, Justin C McCarty2, Edward J Caterson2,3, Scott A Goldberg1, Juan P Herrera-Escobar2, Meghan McDonald4, Stuart Lipsitz2, Adil H Haider2,5. 1. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Trauma, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Deputy Editor.
Abstract
Importance: Several national initiatives have emerged to empower laypersons to act as immediate responders to reduce preventable deaths from uncontrolled bleeding. Point-of-care instructional interventions have been developed in response to the scalability challenges associated with in-person training. However, to our knowledge, their effectiveness for hemorrhage control has not been established. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of different instructional point-of-care interventions and in-person training for hemorrhage control compared with no intervention and assess skill retention 3 to 9 months after hemorrhage control training. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial of 465 laypersons was conducted at a professional sports stadium in Massachusetts with capacity for 66 000 people and assessed correct tourniquet application by using different point-of-care interventions (audio kits and flashcards) and a Bleeding Control Basic (B-Con) course. Non-B-Con arms received B-Con training after initial testing (conducted from April 2017 to August 2017). Retesting for 303 participants (65%) was performed 3 to 9 months after training (October 2017 to January 2018) to evaluate B-Con retention. A logistic regression for demographic associations was performed for retention testing. Interventions: Participants were randomized into 4 arms: instructional flashcards, audio kits with embedded flashcards, B-Con, and control. All participants received B-Con training to later assess retention. Main Outcomes and Measures: Correct tourniquet application in a simulated scenario. Results: Of the 465 participants, 189 (40.7%) were women and the mean (SD) age was 46.3 (16.1) years. For correct tourniquet application, B-Con (88% correct application [n = 122]; P < .001) was superior to control (n = 104 [16%]) while instructional flashcards (n = 117 [19.6%]) and audio kit (n = 122 [23%]) groups were not. More than half of participants in point-of-care arms did not use the educational prompts as intended. Of 303 participants (65%) who were assessed 3 to 9 months after undergoing B-Con training, 165 (54.5%) could correctly apply a tourniquet. Over this period, there was no further skill decay in the adjusted model that treated time as either linear (odds ratio [OR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.95-1.03) or quadratic (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 1.00-1.00). The only demographic that was associated with correct application at retention was age; adults aged 18 to 35 years (n = 58; OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.21-4.72) and aged 35 to 55 years (n = 107; OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.04-3.02) were more likely to be efficacious than those older than 55 years (n = 138). Conclusions and Relevance: In-person hemorrhage control training for laypersons is currently the most efficacious means of enabling bystanders to act to control hemorrhage. Laypersons can successfully perform tourniquet application after undergoing a 1-hour course. However, only 54.5% retain this skill after 3 to 9 months, suggesting that investigating refresher training or improved point-of-care instructions is critical. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03479112.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Several national initiatives have emerged to empower laypersons to act as immediate responders to reduce preventable deaths from uncontrolled bleeding. Point-of-care instructional interventions have been developed in response to the scalability challenges associated with in-person training. However, to our knowledge, their effectiveness for hemorrhage control has not been established. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of different instructional point-of-care interventions and in-person training for hemorrhage control compared with no intervention and assess skill retention 3 to 9 months after hemorrhage control training. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial of 465 laypersons was conducted at a professional sports stadium in Massachusetts with capacity for 66 000 people and assessed correct tourniquet application by using different point-of-care interventions (audio kits and flashcards) and a Bleeding Control Basic (B-Con) course. Non-B-Con arms received B-Con training after initial testing (conducted from April 2017 to August 2017). Retesting for 303 participants (65%) was performed 3 to 9 months after training (October 2017 to January 2018) to evaluate B-Con retention. A logistic regression for demographic associations was performed for retention testing. Interventions: Participants were randomized into 4 arms: instructional flashcards, audio kits with embedded flashcards, B-Con, and control. All participants received B-Con training to later assess retention. Main Outcomes and Measures: Correct tourniquet application in a simulated scenario. Results: Of the 465 participants, 189 (40.7%) were women and the mean (SD) age was 46.3 (16.1) years. For correct tourniquet application, B-Con (88% correct application [n = 122]; P < .001) was superior to control (n = 104 [16%]) while instructional flashcards (n = 117 [19.6%]) and audio kit (n = 122 [23%]) groups were not. More than half of participants in point-of-care arms did not use the educational prompts as intended. Of 303 participants (65%) who were assessed 3 to 9 months after undergoing B-Con training, 165 (54.5%) could correctly apply a tourniquet. Over this period, there was no further skill decay in the adjusted model that treated time as either linear (odds ratio [OR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.95-1.03) or quadratic (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 1.00-1.00). The only demographic that was associated with correct application at retention was age; adults aged 18 to 35 years (n = 58; OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.21-4.72) and aged 35 to 55 years (n = 107; OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.04-3.02) were more likely to be efficacious than those older than 55 years (n = 138). Conclusions and Relevance: In-personhemorrhage control training for laypersons is currently the most efficacious means of enabling bystanders to act to control hemorrhage. Laypersons can successfully perform tourniquet application after undergoing a 1-hour course. However, only 54.5% retain this skill after 3 to 9 months, suggesting that investigating refresher training or improved point-of-care instructions is critical. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03479112.
Authors: Malcolm Woollard; Richard Whitfeild; Anna Smith; Michael Colquhoun; Robert G Newcombe; Norman Vetteer; Douglas Chamberlain Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Russ S Kotwal; Jeffrey T Howard; Jean A Orman; Bruce W Tarpey; Jeffrey A Bailey; Howard R Champion; Robert L Mabry; John B Holcomb; Kirby R Gross Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Aytekin Unlu; E Kaya; I Guvenc; S Kaymak; R A Cetinkaya; E O Lapsekili; M T Ozer; A Guler; R Yildiz; P Petrone; A Harlak; S Kilic Journal: J R Army Med Corps Date: 2014-11-11 Impact factor: 1.285
Authors: Kandra Strauss-Riggs; Thomas D Kirsch; Erik Prytz; Richard C Hunt; Carl-Oscar Jonson; Jon Krohmer; Ira Nemeth; Craig Goolsby Journal: AEM Educ Train Date: 2020-04-16
Authors: Justin C McCarty; Zain G Hashmi; Juan P Herrera-Escobar; Elzerie de Jager; Muhammad Ali Chaudhary; Stuart R Lipsitz; Molly Jarman; Edward J Caterson; Eric Goralnick Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Ava K Mokhtari; Sarah Mikdad; Casey Luckhurst; John Hwabejire; Jason Fawley; Jonathan J Parks; April E Mendoza; Haytham M A Kaafarani; George C Velmahos; Frank W Bloemers; Noelle N Saillant Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 2.374
Authors: Craig A Goolsby; Keke Schuler; Raphaelle Rodzik; Nathan Charlton; Vidya Lala; Kevin Anderson; Jeffrey L Pellegrino Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2021-06-29
Authors: Karen L Zhao; Madeline Herrenkohl; Maria Paulsen; Eileen M Bulger; Monica S Vavilala; Megan Moore; Tam N Pham Journal: Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Date: 2019-07-26
Authors: Juan José Meléndez-Lugo; Yaset Caicedo; Mónica Guzmán-Rodríguez; José Julián Serna; Juliana Ordoñez; Edison Angamarca; Alberto García; Luis Fernando Pino; Laureano Quintero; Michael W Parra; Carlos A Ordoñez Journal: Colomb Med (Cali) Date: 2020-12-30
Authors: Craig Goolsby; Luis E Rojas; Michael Andersen; Nathan Charlton; Laura Tilley; Jason Pasley; Todd E Rasmussen; Matthew J Levy Journal: J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Date: 2020-08-17