Deborah E Barnes1,2,3, Amy L Byers1,2,3, Raquel C Gardner1,4, Karen H Seal1,2,5, W John Boscardin1,5, Kristine Yaffe1,2,3,4. 1. San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco. 4. Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco. 5. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Abstract
Importance: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common in both veteran and civilian populations. Prior studies have linked moderate and severe TBI with increased dementia risk, but the association between dementia and mild TBI, particularly mild TBI without loss of consciousness (LOC), remains unclear. Objective: To examine the association between TBI severity, LOC, and dementia diagnosis in veterans. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study of all patients diagnosed with a TBI in the Veterans Health Administration health care system from October 1, 2001, to September 30, 2014, and a propensity-matched comparison group. Patients with dementia at baseline were excluded. Researchers identified TBIs through the Comprehensive TBI Evaluation database, which is restricted to Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, and the National Patient Care Database, which includes veterans of all eras. The severity of each TBI was based on the most severe injury recorded and classified as mild without LOC, mild with LOC, mild with LOC status unknown, or moderate or severe using Department of Defense or Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center criteria. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes were used to identify dementia diagnoses during follow-up and medical and psychiatric comorbidities in the 2 years prior to the index date. Main Outcomes and Measures: Dementia diagnosis in veterans who had experienced TBI with or without LOC and control participants without TBI exposure. Results: The study included 178 779 patients diagnosed with a TBI in the Veterans Health Administration health care system and 178 779 patients in a propensity-matched comparison group. Veterans had a mean (SD) age of nearly 49.5 (18.2) years at baseline; 33 250 (9.3%) were women, and 259 136 (72.5%) were non-Hispanic white individuals. Differences between veterans with and without TBI were small. A total of 4698 veterans (2.6%) without TBI developed dementia compared with 10 835 (6.1%) of those with TBI. After adjustment for demographics and medical and psychiatric comobidities, adjusted hazard ratios for dementia were 2.36 (95% CI, 2.10-2.66) for mild TBI without LOC, 2.51 (95% CI, 2.29-2.76) for mild TBI with LOC, 3.19 (95% CI, 3.05-3.33) for mild TBI with LOC status unknown, and 3.77 (95% CI, 3.63-3.91) for moderate to severe TBI. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of more than 350 000 veterans, even mild TBI without LOC was associated with more than a 2-fold increase in the risk of dementia diagnosis. Studies of strategies to determine mechanisms, prevention, and treatment of TBI-related dementia in veterans are urgently needed.
Importance: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common in both veteran and civilian populations. Prior studies have linked moderate and severe TBI with increased dementia risk, but the association between dementia and mild TBI, particularly mild TBI without loss of consciousness (LOC), remains unclear. Objective: To examine the association between TBI severity, LOC, and dementia diagnosis in veterans. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study of all patients diagnosed with a TBI in the Veterans Health Administration health care system from October 1, 2001, to September 30, 2014, and a propensity-matched comparison group. Patients with dementia at baseline were excluded. Researchers identified TBIs through the Comprehensive TBI Evaluation database, which is restricted to Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, and the National Patient Care Database, which includes veterans of all eras. The severity of each TBI was based on the most severe injury recorded and classified as mild without LOC, mild with LOC, mild with LOC status unknown, or moderate or severe using Department of Defense or Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center criteria. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes were used to identify dementia diagnoses during follow-up and medical and psychiatric comorbidities in the 2 years prior to the index date. Main Outcomes and Measures: Dementia diagnosis in veterans who had experienced TBI with or without LOC and control participants without TBI exposure. Results: The study included 178 779 patients diagnosed with a TBI in the Veterans Health Administration health care system and 178 779 patients in a propensity-matched comparison group. Veterans had a mean (SD) age of nearly 49.5 (18.2) years at baseline; 33 250 (9.3%) were women, and 259 136 (72.5%) were non-Hispanic white individuals. Differences between veterans with and without TBI were small. A total of 4698 veterans (2.6%) without TBI developed dementia compared with 10 835 (6.1%) of those with TBI. After adjustment for demographics and medical and psychiatric comobidities, adjusted hazard ratios for dementia were 2.36 (95% CI, 2.10-2.66) for mild TBI without LOC, 2.51 (95% CI, 2.29-2.76) for mild TBI with LOC, 3.19 (95% CI, 3.05-3.33) for mild TBI with LOC status unknown, and 3.77 (95% CI, 3.63-3.91) for moderate to severe TBI. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of more than 350 000 veterans, even mild TBI without LOC was associated with more than a 2-fold increase in the risk of dementia diagnosis. Studies of strategies to determine mechanisms, prevention, and treatment of TBI-related dementia in veterans are urgently needed.
Authors: Lee E Goldstein; Andrew M Fisher; Chad A Tagge; Xiao-Lei Zhang; Libor Velisek; John A Sullivan; Chirag Upreti; Jonathan M Kracht; Maria Ericsson; Mark W Wojnarowicz; Cezar J Goletiani; Giorgi M Maglakelidze; Noel Casey; Juliet A Moncaster; Olga Minaeva; Robert D Moir; Christopher J Nowinski; Robert A Stern; Robert C Cantu; James Geiling; Jan K Blusztajn; Benjamin L Wolozin; Tsuneya Ikezu; Thor D Stein; Andrew E Budson; Neil W Kowall; David Chargin; Andre Sharon; Sudad Saman; Garth F Hall; William C Moss; Robin O Cleveland; Rudolph E Tanzi; Patric K Stanton; Ann C McKee Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Jasmeet P Hayes; Mark W Logue; Naomi Sadeh; Jeffrey M Spielberg; Mieke Verfaellie; Scott M Hayes; Andrew Reagan; David H Salat; Erika J Wolf; Regina E McGlinchey; William P Milberg; Annjanette Stone; Steven A Schichman; Mark W Miller Journal: Brain Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Christian LoBue; Hannah Wadsworth; Kristin Wilmoth; Matthew Clem; John Hart; Kyle B Womack; Nyaz Didehbani; Laura H Lacritz; Heidi C Rossetti; C Munro Cullum Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2016-11-18 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: Bennet I Omalu; Steven T DeKosky; Ronald L Hamilton; Ryan L Minster; M Ilyas Kamboh; Abdulrezak M Shakir; Cyril H Wecht Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Helen Ling; Huw R Morris; James W Neal; Andrew J Lees; John Hardy; Janice L Holton; Tamas Revesz; David D R Williams Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Leslie Grasset; M Maria Glymour; Kristine Yaffe; Samuel L Swift; Kan Z Gianattasio; Melinda C Power; Adina Zeki Al Hazzouri Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2020-04-22 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Ryan A Opel; Alison Christy; Erin L Boespflug; Kristianna B Weymann; Brendan Case; Jeffery M Pollock; Lisa C Silbert; Miranda M Lim Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Cassandra L Pattinson; Jessica M Gill; Sara M Lippa; Tracey A Brickell; Louis M French; Rael T Lange Journal: J Trauma Stress Date: 2019-07-10
Authors: Raquel C Gardner; Ernesto Rivera; Megan O'Grady; Colin Doherty; Kristine Yaffe; John D Corrigan; Jennifer Bogner; Joel Kramer; Fiona Wilson Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2020 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Xuan Gao; Han Wang; Yong-Yue Gao; Xiao-Ming Zhou; Tao Tao; Guang-Jie Liu; Yan Zhou; Wei Li; Chun-Hua Hang Journal: Am J Transl Res Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 4.060