| Literature DB >> 29799442 |
Mariana Sánchez-Ramos1,2, Silvia Marquina Bahena3, Antonio Romero-Estrada4, Antonio Bernabé-Antonio5, Francisco Cruz-Sosa6, Judith Gonzálesssz-Christen7, Juan José Acevedo-Fernández8, Irene Perea-Arango9, Laura Alvarez10.
Abstract
A protocol was established to produce bioactive compounds in a callus culture of Ageratina pichinchensis by using 1 mg L-1 NAA with 0.1 mg L-1 KIN. The phytochemical study of the EtOAc extract obtained from the callus biomass, allowed the isolation and characterization of eleven secondary metabolites, of which dihydrobenzofuran (5) and 3-epilupeol (7), showed important anti-inflammatory activity. Compound 5 inhibits in vitro the secretion of NO (IC50 = 36.96 ± 1.06 μM), IL-6 (IC50 = 73.71 ± 3.21 μM), and TNF-α (IC50 = 73.20 ± 5.99 μM) in RAW (Murine macrophage cells) 264.7 macrophages, as well as the activation of NF-κB (40% at 150 μM) in RAW-blue macrophages, while compound 7 has been described that inhibit the in vivo TPA-induced ear edema, and the in vitro production of NO, and the PLA2 enzyme activity. In addition, quantitative GC-MS analysis showed that the anti-inflammatory metabolites 5 and 7 were not detected in the wild plant. Overall, our results indicated that A. pichinchensis can be used as an alternative biotechnological resource for obtaining anti-inflammatory compounds. This is the first report of the anti-inflammatory activity of compound 5 and its production in a callus culture of A. pichinchensis.Entities:
Keywords: 3-epilupeol; Ageratina pichinchensis; anti-inflammatory; callus culture; dihydrobenzofuran
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29799442 PMCID: PMC6099804 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23061258
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Morphogenetic responses of plant growth regulators (PGRs) on A. pichinchensis leaf explant at 20 days culture.
| PGRs (mg L−1) | Callus | Callus with Roots (%) | Roots | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAA | KIN | |||
| 0 | 0 | 0.00 ± 0.00 e | 0.00 ± 0.00 c | 0.00 ± 0.00 d |
| 0 | 0.1 | 0.00 ± 0.00 e | 0.00 ± 0.00 c | 0.00 ± 0.00 d |
| 0 | 1 | 0.00 ± 0.00 e | 28.33 ± 4.19 ab | 33.33 ± 4.35 abc |
| 0 | 2 | 0.00 ± 0.00 e | 21.67 ± 5.03 bc | 51.67 ± 10.40 a |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0.00 ± 0.00 e | 0.00 ± 0.00 c | 0.00 ± 0.00 d |
| 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.00 ± 0.00 e | 20.00 ± 4.45 bc | 36.67 ± 7.52 abc |
| 0.1 | 1 | 0.00 ± 0.00 e | 33.33 ± 6.37 ab | 51.67 ± 8.40 a |
| 0.1 | 2 | 0.00 ± 0.00 e | 31.67 ± 5.23 ab | 40.00 ± 6.25 ab |
| 1 | 0 | 30.00 ± 8.66 d | 0.00 ± 0.00 c | 0.00 ± 0.00 d |
| 1 | 0.1 | 81.67 ± 7.64 a | 7.50 ± 1.15 c | 0.00 ± 0.00 d |
| 1 | 1 | 41.67 ±7.64 bcd | 36.67 ± 4.04 ab | 21.66 ± 3.45 bcd |
| 1 | 2 | 5.00 ± 0.61 e | 50.00 ± 6.35 a | 35.16 ± 7.22 abc |
| 2 | 0 | 33.33 ± 5.77 cd | 0.00 ± 0.00 c | 0.00 ± 0.00 d |
| 2 | 0.1 | 51.67 ±12.58 b | 33.33 ± 3.84 ab | 15.00 ± 4.25 cd |
| 2 | 1 | 48.33 ± 4.16 bc | 20.00 ± 2.54 bc | 0.00 ± 0.00 d |
| 2 | 2 | 10.00 ± 1.11 e | 30.00 ± 3.76 ab | 38.33 ± 2.89 ab |
These letters mean that the data is statistically significant.
Figure 1Effect of plant growth regulators on callus induction. (a) callus, (b) callus with roots, (c) roots.
Figure 2Chemical structures of compounds isolated from callus culture of A. pichinchensis.
Figure 3Effect of compounds 2 (a) and 5 (b) on the viability of RAW 264.7 cells. The values are expressed as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments (n = 3). Significance was determined using ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test (**** p < 0.0001 DMSO, ETOP (etoposide) and compounds compared with control group).
Figure 4Effect of compounds 2 (a) and 5 (b) on NO production in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages. The values are expressed as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments (n = 3). Significance was determined using ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test (#### p < 0.0001 LPS compared with control group; * p < 0.05 and **** p < 0.0001 DMSO, INDO (indomethacin) and compounds compared with LPS group).
Figure 5Effect of compound 5 on IL-6 (a) and TNF-α (b) secretion in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7, and NF-κB activation in LPS stimulated RAW-blue (c). The values are expressed as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments (n = 3). Significance was determined using ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test (#### p < 0.0001). LPS compared with control group; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001 INDO (indomethacin) or UA (ursolic acid) or compound 5, all compared with LPS group.