Literature DB >> 29796710

[Merging different biobanks under one roof : Benefits and constraints on the way to a centralized biobank using the example of the BMBH].

S Schmitt1, C Döllinger2, A Maier2, E Herpel2, P Schirmacher2, R Kirsten2.   

Abstract

Founded in 1386, Heidelberg University is Germany's oldest and one of Europe's most reputable universities. As a scientific hub in Germany, Heidelberg is home to several internationally renowned medical research facilities that have an enormous demand for biomaterial samples and data-especially in the field of translational and cancer research.The main objective of the BMBF-funded project "BioMaterialBank Heidelberg" (BMBH) was the harmonization of local biobanking under the same administrative roof through the implementation of common and standardized project, data, and quality management procedures.In the very beginning, existing structures and processes of the participating biobanks in Heidelberg were identified and a common administrative structure with central representatives for IT and quality management (QM) was established to coordinate all BMBH activities.Over time, implementation of consented structures and processes took place, also revealing organizational challenges that had to be solved concerning, for example, differences in sample handling and the definition of consistent access regulations.We will discuss below these challenges as well as the opportunities of building a centralized biobank and show how issues can be resolved using the example of the BMBH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological specimen banks; Biomedical research; Health care quality assurance; Tissue banks

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29796710     DOI: 10.1007/s00292-018-0444-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathologe        ISSN: 0172-8113            Impact factor:   1.011


  6 in total

1.  Quality management and accreditation of research tissue banks: experience of the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg.

Authors:  Esther Herpel; Christoph Röcken; Heike Manke; Peter Schirmacher; Christa Flechtenmacher
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  [Maintainance of a research tissue bank. (Infra)structural and quality aspects].

Authors:  S Schmitt; K Kynast; P Schirmacher; E Herpel
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Challenges for quality management in implementation, maintenance, and sustainability of research tissue biobanks.

Authors:  S Schmitt; K Kynast; P Schirmacher; E Herpel
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  [Research biobanks--development and structure].

Authors:  E Herpel; M Hummel
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 0.628

5.  [Securing the sustainability of biobanks].

Authors:  Romy Kirsten; Michael Hummel
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  [Tissue bank of the National Centre for Tumour Disease. An innovative platform for translational tumour].

Authors:  E Herpel; N Koleganova; P Schirmacher
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.011

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.