Literature DB >> 26769112

[Securing the sustainability of biobanks].

Romy Kirsten1, Michael Hummel2.   

Abstract

Active research sites in biomedicine need professionally structured, sustainable biobanks that represent established resources and technology platforms across different locations and disciplines. Currently, the funding of research biobanks is not uniformly regulated, mainly because of the different focuses, services and concepts. On the other hand, the samples and associated data of biobanks gain significant value over time, and therefore their long-term storage should be envisaged right from the start.The sustainability of biobank structures can be viewed from various perspectives, but financial sustainability certainly represents the most demanding challenge. The financing of biobanks can be achieved by a well-balanced model consisting of institutional resources and other funding sources such as infrastructure and research projects, complemented by reimbursement. Structural measures such as the creation of centralized biobank structures and involvement in consortia and networks contribute to the long-term use and exchange of samples across biobanks. In turn, a quality-controlled and transparent documentation of all processes and structures is required, which guarantees the utilization of the sparse financial resources for the most efficient use of the precious resource of human biomaterial. The long-term goal is the sustainable financing of an infrastructure that is essential for any modern biomedical research and provides benefit for the society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biobanking networks; Biobanks; Financing; Research infrastructure; Sustainability

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26769112     DOI: 10.1007/s00103-015-2302-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz        ISSN: 1436-9990            Impact factor:   1.513


  2 in total

Review 1.  [Merging different biobanks under one roof : Benefits and constraints on the way to a centralized biobank using the example of the BMBH].

Authors:  S Schmitt; C Döllinger; A Maier; E Herpel; P Schirmacher; R Kirsten
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 2.  Has the biobank bubble burst? Withstanding the challenges for sustainable biobanking in the digital era.

Authors:  Don Chalmers; Dianne Nicol; Jane Kaye; Jessica Bell; Alastair V Campbell; Calvin W L Ho; Kazuto Kato; Jusaku Minari; Chih-Hsing Ho; Colin Mitchell; Fruzsina Molnár-Gábor; Margaret Otlowski; Daniel Thiel; Stephanie M Fullerton; Tess Whitton
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.