Literature DB >> 29795999

Effects of Formic or Acetic Acid on the Storage Quality
 of Mixed Air-Dried Corn Stover and Cabbage Waste,
and Microbial Community Analysis.

Haiwei Ren1,2, Cong Wang1, Wenguang Fan1, Bingyun Zhang1, Zhizhong Li1, Dong Li3.   

Abstract

A mixture of air-dried corn stover and cabbage waste was ensiled to preserve lignocellulosic biomass for use as biofuel. Furthermore, the effects of different fresh mass fractions (0.3 and 0.6%) of formic or acetic acid on the mixed silage quality were evaluated to guarantee its quality. The application of formic or acetic acid prior to mixing the silage led to higher water-soluble carbohydrate fractions than the negative control, indicating that both acids contributed to preservation of water-soluble carbohydrates during storage for 170 days. The dry matter content was also increased after storage from 90 to 170 days. It was found that the content of neutral and acid detergent fibre, cellulose and holocellulose (the sum of cellulose and hemicellulose) in mixed silage treated with formic or acetic acid was significantly lower than that obtained in the negative control. The pH and the ratio of ammoniacal nitrogen to total nitrogen in mixed silage treated with acetic acid also significantly decreased. Furthermore, the addition of formic or acetic acid significantly weakened the fermentation intensity of lactic acid, depending on the ratio of lactic to acetic acid, as well as the ratio of lactic acid to total organic acids. The number of bacterial species and their relative abundance shifted during silage mixing, wherein microbial communities at phylum level mainly consisted of Proteobacteria and Firmicutes. The dominant bacteria were also observed to shift from Lactobacillus and Enterobacter in presilage biomass to Lactobacillus and Paralactobacillus. Specifically, Enterobacter disappeared after 130 days of storage. In conclusion, the addition of a low dose of acetic acid to fresh mass (0.3%) could effectively improve the fermentation quality and is conducive to the preservation of the organic components.

Entities:  

Keywords:  air-dried corn stover; cabbage waste; fermentation quality; formic and acetic acids; microbial community diversity; mixed ensiling

Year:  2018        PMID: 29795999      PMCID: PMC5956268          DOI: 10.17113/ftb.56.01.18.5455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Technol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1330-9862            Impact factor:   3.918


  23 in total

Review 1.  Biogas production: current state and perspectives.

Authors:  Peter Weiland
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Effects of ensiling, silage additives and storage period on methane formation of biogas crops.

Authors:  Christiane Herrmann; Monika Heiermann; Christine Idler
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 9.642

3.  A new algorithm to characterize biodegradability of biomass during anaerobic digestion: influence of lignin concentration on methane production potential.

Authors:  Jin M Triolo; Sven G Sommer; Henrik B Møller; Martin R Weisbjerg; Xin Y Jiang
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 9.642

4.  Effect of microalgae supplementation on the silage quality and anaerobic digestion performance of Manyflower silvergrass.

Authors:  Lianhua Li; Yongming Sun; Zhenhong Yuan; Xiaoying Kong; Yao Wao; Ligui Yang; Yi Zhang; Dong Li
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 9.642

5.  Material and microbial changes during corn stalk silage and their effects on methane fermentation.

Authors:  Yubin Zhao; Jiadong Yu; Jingjing Liu; HongYan Yang; Lijuan Gao; XuFeng Yuan; Zong-Jun Cui; Xiaofen Wang
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 9.642

6.  Effects of chemical additives on the fermentation quality and N distribution of alfalfa silage in south of China.

Authors:  Ping Li; Shuren Ji; Chen Hou; Haiyang Tang; Qian Wang; Yixin Shen
Journal:  Anim Sci J       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 1.749

7.  The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri and other additives on the fermentation and aerobic stability of barley silage.

Authors:  L Kung; N K Ranjit
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Acetic acid increases stability of silage under aerobic conditions.

Authors:  H Danner; M Holzer; E Mayrhuber; R Braun
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Evaluation of preservation methods for improving biogas production and enzymatic conversion yields of annual crops.

Authors:  Annukka Pakarinen; Pekka Maijala; Seija Jaakkola; Frederick L Stoddard; Maritta Kymäläinen; Liisa Viikari
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  The effect of a silage inoculant on silage quality, aerobic stability, and meat production on farm scale.

Authors:  Y Acosta Aragón; J Jatkauskas; V Vrotniakienė
Journal:  ISRN Vet Sci       Date:  2012-04-09
View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of storage time and the level of formic acid on fermentation characteristics, epiphytic microflora, carbohydrate components and in vitro digestibility of rice straw silage.

Authors:  Jie Zhao; Siran Wang; Zhihao Dong; Junfeng Li; Yushan Jia; Tao Shao
Journal:  Anim Biosci       Date:  2021-04-22

2.  Treatment of Whole-Plant Corn Silage With Lactic Acid Bacteria and Organic Acid Enhances Quality by Elevating Acid Content, Reducing pH, and Inhibiting Undesirable Microorganisms.

Authors:  Fu-Gui Jiang; Hai-Jian Cheng; Dong Liu; Chen Wei; Wen-Juan An; Ya-Fang Wang; Hai-Tao Sun; En-Liang Song
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Mixed silage with Chinese cabbage waste enhances antioxidant ability by increasing ascorbate and aldarate metabolism through rumen Prevotellaceae UCG-004 in Hu sheep.

Authors:  Chuang Li; Ning Chen; Xingxing Zhang; Khuram Shahzad; Ruxin Qi; Zhenbin Zhang; Zhiqi Lu; Yue Lu; Xiang Yu; Muhammad Hammad Zafar; Mengzhi Wang; Wujun Liu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 6.064

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.