| Literature DB >> 29794976 |
Ahmed Al-Kattan1, Viraj P Nirwan2,3, Anton Popov4, Yury V Ryabchikov5,6, Gleb Tselikov7, Marc Sentis8,9, Amir Fahmi10, Andrei V Kabashin11,12.
Abstract
Driven by surface cleanness and unique physical, optical and chemical properties, bare (ligand-free) laser-synthesized nanoparticles (NPs) are now in the focus of interest as promising materials for the development of advanced biomedical platforms related to biosensing, bioimaging and therapeutic drug delivery. We recently achieved significant progress in the synthesis of bare gold (Au) and silicon (Si) NPs and their testing in biomedical tasks, including cancer imaging and therapy, biofuel cells, etc. We also showed that these nanomaterials can be excellent candidates for tissue engineering applications. This review is aimed at the description of our recent progress in laser synthesis of bare Si and Au NPs and their testing as functional modules (additives) in innovative scaffold platforms intended for tissue engineering tasks.Entities:
Keywords: Electrospinning; Nanofibers; Nanoparticles; Nanotheranostics; Scaffolds; Tissue engineering; laser ablation in liquid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29794976 PMCID: PMC6032194 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19061563
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1(a) Typical PLAL setup; (b) Illustrative image of colloidal Si NPs solution prepared by femtosecond (fs) laser fragmentation.
Figure 2Schematic presentation of laser ablation (a) and laser fragmentation (b) geometries.
Figure 3(a) HR-TEM image of Si NPs obtained by laser fragmentation at 0.35 g·L−1 initial concentration of microcolloids (Inset, typical image of Si NPs solution). (b) Single laser-synthesized Si nanoparticle. Characteristic electron diffraction pattern of Si NPs (c) and corresponding size distributions (d). Adapted from ref. [67].
Figure 4Size evolution (in percent, relative to the initial size of Si NPs prepared under oxygen-rich (black) and oxygen-free (blue, Ar bubbling) conditions as a function of dialysis duration in deionized water. Adapted from ref. [67].
Figure 5(a) MTT assays of HMEC cells viability following their exposure to different concentration of Si NPs (1.25–100 µg/mL) for 72 h. (b) TEM images of HMEC cells showing kinetics of Si NPs internalization 72 h after incubation time with 50 µg/mL of NPs. (c) Inhibition of the tumor growth after the following treatments: the injection of Si NPs suspension without RF irradiation (black curve); 2 min treatment of tumor area by RF irradiation with the intensity of 2 W/cm2 (blue); injection of a suspension of porous Si NPs (PSi NPs) (0.5 mL, 1 mg/mL) followed by 2 min RF irradiation treatment (red); injection of a suspension of laser-synthesized Si NPs (LA-Si NPs) (0.2 mL, 0.4 mg/mL) followed by 2 min RF irradiation treatment (green). (d,e) are histology images of a tumor area 1 h and 3 days after the PSi NP injection and RF-based treatment using PSi NPs as nanosensitizers, respectively. Cancer cells are visible as dark blue spots. Examples of agglomerations of PSi NPs in the cells are indicated by red arrows. Adapted from refs. [43,83].
Figure 6Typical HR-TEM image of Au NPs prepared by PLAL (a) and corresponding size distribution (b).
Figure 7(a) Illustrative image of electrospun chitosan(PEO) nanofibers functionalized with bare Si NPs. (b) SEM of hybrid chitosan (PEO) nanofibers functionalized with bare Si NPs at 30 wt. %. (c) SEM of hybrid chitosan (PEO) nanofibers functionalized with bare Au NPs at 30 wt. %. Adapted from ref. [73].