Felix Anthony Lubega1, Mithrika S DeSilva2, Deogratias Munube3, Rita Nkwine4, Janat Tumukunde4, Peter K Agaba4, Mary T Nabukenya4, Fred Bulamba5, Tonny S Luggya4. 1. Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Aga Khan University Hospital Nairobi, P. O. Box 30270-00100, Nairobi, Kenya. 2. Department of Paediatrics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. 3. Sickle Cell Clinic, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. 4. Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. 5. Department of Anesthesia, CURE Children's Hospital of Uganda, Mbale, Uganda.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Acute pain episodes associated with sickle cell disease (SCD) are very difficult to manage effectively. Opioid tolerance and side effects have been major roadblocks in our ability to provide these patients with adequate pain relief. Ketamine is cheap, widely safe, readily available drug, with analgesic effects at sub-anesthetic doses and has been used in wide range of surgeries, pediatric burns dressing change and cancer related pain however, literature concerning its use in sickle cell crises is still limited in our setting. This study aimed to establish if 1 mg/kg of intravenous ketamine is non inferior to intravenous morphine 0.1 mg/kg in severe SCD-associated pain. METHODS: We performed an institutional review board-approved randomized, prospective, double-blinded, active-control, non-inferiority trial at the national referral sickle cell center. Children between 7 and 18 years of age with severe painful sickle cell crisis, defined by numerical rating scale score of greater or equal to 7 were enrolled. Patients were consented and randomized to receive, either IV ketamine (LDK) 1 mg/kg or IV morphine (MOR) 0.1 mg/kg as an infusion over 10 min. The primary endpoint is maximal change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score. Secondary outcomes were, incidence of adverse effects, optimal time to and duration of action of ketamine and incidence of treatment failures by treatment group. A clinically meaningful difference in validated pain scores was defined as 1.3 units. Assuming both treatments are on average equal, a sample size of 240 patients (120 per group) provided 95% power to demonstrate that IV LDK is non-inferior to IV morphine with a 0.05 level of significance and a 10% non-inferiority margin. All analyses were based on a modified intention to treat. This trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov NCT02434939. RESULTS:Two hundred and forty patients were enrolled (LDK120, MOR120). Demographic variables and baseline NRS scores (8.9 vs. 9.2) were similar. LDK was comparable to MOR in the maximum change in NRS scores, 66.4% vs. 61.3% (MD 5.5; 95% CI -2.2 to -13.2). Time to achieve maximum reduction in NRS pain scores was at 19.8 min for LDK and 34.1 min for MOR. The average duration of action for LDK was 60 min. MOR had more patients still at maximum effect at 120 min (45.8% vs. 37.5%; RR 1.2; 95% CI 0.9-1.7). LDK patients were 11.3 times more likely to develop side effects, though were transient, anticipated and non-life threatening (37.5% vs. 3.3%). MOR had significantly more treatment failures 40% vs. 28.3% (RR 0.7; 95% CI 0.5-1.03, p=0.07) Vital signs and sedation scores were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS:Intravenous LDK at 1 mg/kg provides comparable analgesic effectiveness as IV MOR in the acute treatment of severe painful sickle cell crisis in children in the day care sickle cell center. However, it is associated with a high incidence of several transient, non-life threatening mild side effects. IMPLICATIONS: Intravenous ketamine at 1 mg/kg can be a reliable alternative to morphine in the management of severe painful sickle cell crisis especially in a resource limited area where morphine is not readily available.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Acute pain episodes associated with sickle cell disease (SCD) are very difficult to manage effectively. Opioid tolerance and side effects have been major roadblocks in our ability to provide these patients with adequate pain relief. Ketamine is cheap, widely safe, readily available drug, with analgesic effects at sub-anesthetic doses and has been used in wide range of surgeries, pediatric burns dressing change and cancer related pain however, literature concerning its use in sickle cell crises is still limited in our setting. This study aimed to establish if 1 mg/kg of intravenous ketamine is non inferior to intravenous morphine 0.1 mg/kg in severe SCD-associated pain. METHODS: We performed an institutional review board-approved randomized, prospective, double-blinded, active-control, non-inferiority trial at the national referral sickle cell center. Children between 7 and 18 years of age with severe painful sickle cell crisis, defined by numerical rating scale score of greater or equal to 7 were enrolled. Patients were consented and randomized to receive, either IV ketamine (LDK) 1 mg/kg or IV morphine (MOR) 0.1 mg/kg as an infusion over 10 min. The primary endpoint is maximal change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score. Secondary outcomes were, incidence of adverse effects, optimal time to and duration of action of ketamine and incidence of treatment failures by treatment group. A clinically meaningful difference in validated pain scores was defined as 1.3 units. Assuming both treatments are on average equal, a sample size of 240 patients (120 per group) provided 95% power to demonstrate that IV LDK is non-inferior to IV morphine with a 0.05 level of significance and a 10% non-inferiority margin. All analyses were based on a modified intention to treat. This trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov NCT02434939. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty patients were enrolled (LDK120, MOR120). Demographic variables and baseline NRS scores (8.9 vs. 9.2) were similar. LDK was comparable to MOR in the maximum change in NRS scores, 66.4% vs. 61.3% (MD 5.5; 95% CI -2.2 to -13.2). Time to achieve maximum reduction in NRS pain scores was at 19.8 min for LDK and 34.1 min for MOR. The average duration of action for LDK was 60 min. MOR had more patients still at maximum effect at 120 min (45.8% vs. 37.5%; RR 1.2; 95% CI 0.9-1.7). LDK patients were 11.3 times more likely to develop side effects, though were transient, anticipated and non-life threatening (37.5% vs. 3.3%). MOR had significantly more treatment failures 40% vs. 28.3% (RR 0.7; 95% CI 0.5-1.03, p=0.07) Vital signs and sedation scores were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous LDK at 1 mg/kg provides comparable analgesic effectiveness as IV MOR in the acute treatment of severe painful sickle cell crisis in children in the day care sickle cell center. However, it is associated with a high incidence of several transient, non-life threatening mild side effects. IMPLICATIONS: Intravenous ketamine at 1 mg/kg can be a reliable alternative to morphine in the management of severe painful sickle cell crisis especially in a resource limited area where morphine is not readily available.
Authors: Amanda M Brandow; C Patrick Carroll; Susan Creary; Ronisha Edwards-Elliott; Jeffrey Glassberg; Robert W Hurley; Abdullah Kutlar; Mohamed Seisa; Jennifer Stinson; John J Strouse; Fouza Yusuf; William Zempsky; Eddy Lang Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2020-06-23
Authors: Mohammed S Alshahrani; Amal H AlSulaibikh; Mohamed R ElTahan; Sukayna Z AlFaraj; Laila P Asonto; Abdullah A AlMulhim; Murad F AlAbbad; Nisreen Almaghraby; Mohammed A AlJumaan; Thamir O AlJunaid; Moath N Darweesh; Faisal M AlHawaj; Alaa M Mahmoud; Bader K Alossaimi; Shaikhah K Alotaibi; Talal M AlMutairi; Duaa A AlSulaiman PharmD; Dunya Alfaraj; Reem Alhawwas; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Kim Lewis; Madeleine Verhovsek; Mark Crowther; Gordon Guyatt; Waleed Alhazzani Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2021-09-21 Impact factor: 5.221
Authors: Mohammed S Alshahrani; Laila Perlas Asonto; Mohamed M El Tahan; Amal H Al Sulaibikh; Sukayna Z Al Faraj; Abdullah A Al Mulhim; Murad F Al Abbad; Samar A Al Nahhash; Moath N Aldarweesh; Alaa M Mahmoud; Nisreen Almaghraby; Mohammed A Al Jumaan; Thamir O Al Junaid; Faisal M Al Hawaj; Samar AlKenany; Omaima F ElSayed; Haitham M Abdelwahab; Mohamed M Moussa; Bader K Alossaimi; Shaikah K Alotaibi; Talal M AlMutairi; Duaa A AlSulaiman; Saad D Al Shahrani; Donia Alfaraj; Waleed Alhazzani Journal: Trials Date: 2019-05-27 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Jena L Welch-Coltrane; Anthony A Wachnik; Meredith C B Adams; Cherie R Avants; Howard A Blumstein; Amber K Brooks; Andrew M Farland; Joshua B Johnson; Manoj Pariyadath; Erik C Summers; Robert W Hurley Journal: Pain Med Date: 2021-08-06 Impact factor: 3.750