Literature DB >> 29792576

Using a deep learning network to recognise low back pain in static standing.

Boyi Hu1, Chong Kim2, Xiaopeng Ning3, Xu Xu4.   

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) remains one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal disorders, while algorithms that able to recognise LBP patients from healthy population using balance performance data are rarely seen. In this study, human balance and body sway performance during standing trials were utilised to recognise chronic LBP populations using deep neural networks. To be specific, 44 chronic LBP and healthy individuals performed static standing tasks, while their spine kinematics and centre of pressure were recorded. A deep learning network with long short-term memory units was used for training, prediction and implementation. The performance of the model was evaluated by: (a) overall accuracy, (b) precision, (c) recall, (d) F1 measure, (e) receiver-operating characteristic and (f) area under the curve. Results indicated that deep neural networks could recognise LBP populations with precision up to 97.2% and recall up to 97.2%. Meanwhile, the results showed that the model with the C7 sensor output performed the best. Practitioner summary: Low back pain (LBP) remains the most common musculoskeletal disorder. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of applying artificial intelligent deep neural network in detecting LBP population from healthy controls with their kinematics data. Results showed a deep learning network can solve the above classification problem with both promising precision and recall performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low back pain; balance control; deep neural network; long-short-term memory; motion analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29792576     DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1481230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  12 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence to improve back pain outcomes and lessons learnt from clinical classification approaches: three systematic reviews.

Authors:  Scott D Tagliaferri; Maia Angelova; Xiaohui Zhao; Patrick J Owen; Clint T Miller; Tim Wilkin; Daniel L Belavy
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-07-09

2.  Learning from Acceleration Data to Differentiate the Posture, Dynamic and Static Work of the Back: An Experimental Setup.

Authors:  Elena Camelia Muşat; Stelian Alexandru Borz
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-15

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence to improve back pain outcomes and lessons learnt from clinical classification approaches: three systematic reviews.

Authors:  Scott D Tagliaferri; Maia Angelova; Xiaohui Zhao; Patrick J Owen; Clint T Miller; Tim Wilkin; Daniel L Belavy
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-07-09

Review 4.  Sensor Technologies to Manage the Physiological Traits of Chronic Pain: A Review.

Authors:  David Naranjo-Hernández; Javier Reina-Tosina; Laura M Roa
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  A Review on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Spinal Diseases.

Authors:  Parisa Azimi; Taravat Yazdanian; Edward C Benzel; Hossein Nayeb Aghaei; Shirzad Azhari; Sohrab Sadeghi; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2020-04-24

6.  A deep learning-based method for grip strength prediction: Comparison of multilayer perceptron and polynomial regression approaches.

Authors:  Jaejin Hwang; Jinwon Lee; Kyung-Sun Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Neurosurgery: a Systematic Literature Review Using Topic Modeling. Part II: Research Objectives and Perspectives.

Authors:  G V Danilov; M A Shifrin; K V Kotik; T A Ishankulov; Yu N Orlov; A S Kulikov; A A Potapov
Journal:  Sovrem Tekhnologii Med       Date:  2020-12-28

Review 8.  Research Trends in Artificial Intelligence Applications in Human Factors Health Care: Mapping Review.

Authors:  Onur Asan; Avishek Choudhury
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2021-06-18

Review 9.  Survival prediction of glioblastoma patients-are we there yet? A systematic review of prognostic modeling for glioblastoma and its clinical potential.

Authors:  Ishaan Ashwini Tewarie; Joeky T Senders; Stijn Kremer; Sharmila Devi; William B Gormley; Omar Arnaout; Timothy R Smith; Marike L D Broekman
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.042

10.  Mathematical and Computational Models for Pain: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Victoria Ashley Lang; Torbjörn Lundh; Max Ortiz-Catalan
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.