| Literature DB >> 29791446 |
Benjamin J Kramer1, Timothy W Davis2, Kevin A Meyer3,4, Barry H Rosen5, Jennifer A Goleski1, Gregory J Dick4, Genesok Oh1, Christopher J Gobler1.
Abstract
Lake Okeechobee, FL, USA, has been subjected to intensifying cyanobacterial blooms that can spread to the adjacent St. Lucie River and Estuary via natural and anthropogenically-induced flooding events. In July 2016, a large, toxic cyanobacterial bloom occurred in Lake Okeechobee and throughout the St. Lucie River and Estuary, leading Florida to declare a state of emergency. This study reports on measurements and nutrient amendment experiments performed in this freshEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29791446 PMCID: PMC5965861 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196278
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Sampling sites around Lake Okeechobee (A) and on the St. Lucie River Estuary (B) in Florida, USA. Sites sampled in both July and September 2016 (●) and September 2016 only (×) are represented. Inserts denote the general region sites were located on the peninsula.
GPS coordinates as well as the collection dates (Month / Day) as well as the dissolved oxygen (mg L-1), temperature (°C), and salinity (PSU) levels from the July and September 2016 transects.
| SITES | JULY 2016 | SEPTEMBER 2016 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | General Location | Coordinates (LAT/LONG) | Month / Day | O2 | °C | PSU | Month / Day | O2 | °C | PSU |
| LO 1 | Eastern | 26.864296, | 7/9 | 7.5 | 32.4 | 0.1 | 9/26 | 5.6 | 30.9 | 0.2 |
| LO 2 | Eastern | 26.984979, | 7/10 | 6.1 | 32.4 | 0.2 | 9/26 | 6.4 | 30.1 | 0.2 |
| LO 3 | Southwestern Shore | 26.760595, | - | - | - | - | 9/28 | 3.6 | 29.6 | 0.2 |
| LO 4 | Western Shore | 26.992225, | - | - | - | - | 9/28 | 1.7 | 30.1 | 0.2 |
| LO 5 | Northern Shore | 27.147202, | - | - | - | - | 9/28 | 3.4 | 30.2 | 0.1 |
| LO 6 | Northern Shore | 27.191742, | - | - | - | - | 9/29 | 2.7 | 26.9 | 0.1 |
| Canal 1 | C-44 | 27.012359, | 7/10 | 6.5 | 33.9 | 0.2 | 9/29 | 5.8 | 29.7 | 0.2 |
| Canal 2 | C-44 | 27.09528, | 7/10 | 3.6 | 32.8 | 0.2 | 9/29 | 4.8 | 29.4 | 0.2 |
| SLE 1 | SF | 27.11349, | 7/8, 7/9 | 6.1 | 32.6 | 0.2 | 9/26 | 6.4 | 30.0 | 0.2 |
| SLE 2 | SF | 27.12091, | 7/8 | 6.6 | 32.2 | 0.2 | 9/27 | 6.1 | 29.8 | 0.2 |
| SLE 3 | SF | 27.13966, | 7/8 | 7.7 | 33.3 | 0.2 | 9/27 | 5.8 | 29.9 | 0.2 |
| SLE 4 | SF | 27.15646, | 7/8 | 8.5 | 34.1 | 0.2 | 9/27 | 5.7 | 29.9 | 0.2 |
| SLE 5 | SF | 27.17057, | 7/8 | 6.7 | 33.1 | 0.2 | 9/27 | 5.4 | 29.8 | 0.2 |
| SLE 6 | ME | 27.18850, | 7/8 | 8.7 | 32.9 | 2.2 | 9/27 | 5.5 | 29.8 | 0.2 |
| SLE 6.5 | ME | 27.19989, | 7/9 | 6.9 | 33.5 | 3.2 | 9/26 | 5.3 | 30.2 | 0.8 |
| SLE 7 | ME | 27.20684, | 7/8 | 5.9 | 33.1 | 3.6 | 9/27 | 7.4 | 31.0 | 1.8 |
| SLE 8 | NF | 27.26080, | 7/8 | 6.2 | 33.9 | 0.5 | 9/27 | 4.8 | 29.1 | 0.4 |
| SLE 9 | NF | 27.22998, | 7/8 | 8.2 | 34.1 | 0.7 | 9/27 | 5.6 | 31.3 | 0.8 |
| SLE 10 | ME | 27.20792, | 7/8, 7/9 | 7.8 | 33.7 | 7.4 | 9/26 | 5.2 | 30.4 | 4.2 |
| SLE 11 | IRL | 27.20509, | 7/8 | 6.8 | 32.6 | 12.6 | 9/27 | 5.5 | 30.6 | 5.7 |
| SLE 12 | IRL | 27.16769, | 7/8 | 6.8 | 31.1 | 27.5 | 9/27 | 5.6 | 30.0 | 10.3 |
| SLE 13 | SLI | 27.16516, | 7/8 | 7.0 | 30.1 | 32.0 | 9/27 | 5.6 | 29.7 | 6.0 |
LO = Lake Okeechobee, Canal = drainage canal connecting the lake to the river estuary, SLE = Saint Lucie Estuary. Sites LO 3–6 were not included until the September 2016 transect.
* = dates when water was collected for nutrient amendment experimentation. General locations of sampling sites are also given, emphasizing from which lake shoreline (LO), canal (C-44), and estuary branch (SF = South Fork, ME = Middle Estuary, NF = North Fork, IRL = Indian River Lagoon, SLI = St. Lucie Inlet) samples were collected
Fig 2July 2016 transect data of sites that represented a strong salinity gradient.
Included are microcystin and salinity values (A), chlorophyll a concentrations (B), densities of the five most abundant phytoplankton (C), and total (D) and dissolved (E) inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations and ratios. Algal densities are represented on the log scale in C. Error bars denote standard deviations.
Fig 3Cyanobacterial taxa abundant in the 2016 summer transect.
Microcystis aeruginosa, bar is 20 μm (A) and 100 μm (B). Aphanocapsa grevillei, bar is 10 μm (C). Dolichospermum circinale, bar is 10 μm and asterisk (*) denotes heterocyst (D). Pseudanabaena spp., bar is 10 μm (E).
Fig 4mcyE (white) and sxtA (shaded) gene abundances (copies mL-1) at sites along the July 2016 transect.
Values are log-transformed and represented in boxplots.
Fig 5Chlorophyll Statistical significance (p < 0.05) among sites is denoted by different letter combinations. Top and bottom letters above bar graphs correspond to statistical differences in chlorophyll a and specific growth rate, respectively.
Fig 6September 2016 transect data of sites that represented a strong salinity gradient.
Included are microcystin and salinity values (A), chlorophyll a concentrations (B), densities of the five most abundant phytoplankton (C), and total (D) and dissolved (E) inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations and ratios. Algal densities are represented on the log scale in C. Error bars denote standard deviations.
Fig 7September 2016 diatom, cyanobacteria, and green algal pigment concentrations from all transect sites.
Error bars represent standard deviations.
Fig 8Chlorophyll a (bar) and specific growth rate (black circle) data at 24 and 72 h from the September 2016 nutrient amendment experiment.
Samples were collected from sites LO 1 (A), SLE 1 (B), and SLE 6.5 (C). Error bars denote standard deviations. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) among sites is denoted by different letter combinations. Top and bottom letters above bar graphs correspond to statistical differences in chlorophyll a and specific growth rate. For B, statistical differences in chlorophyll a and growth rate were only present at 24 and 72 h, respectively.
Fig 9Diatom, cyanobacteria, and green algal pigment concentrations at 48 h from the September 2016 nutrient amendment experiment.
Samples were collected from sites LO 1 (A), SLE 1 (B), and SLE 6.5 (C). Error bars represent standard deviations. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) of specific pigments among sites is denoted by different letter combinations. Letters are ordered relative to the order of parameters listed in the legend. For A, only cyanobacterial and green algal pigment concentrations exhibited statistical differences among treatments.
Fig 10Regression of total nitrogen concentrations, total microcystin concentrations (black circles, dashed regression) and mcyE copies (white circles, dotted regression) during the July transect.