Parisa Vidafar1, Joshua J Gooley2,3,4, Angus C Burns1, Shantha M W Rajaratnam1,2,3, Melanie Rueger2,3, Eliza Van Reen5, Charles A Czeisler2,3, Steven W Lockley1,2,3, Sean W Cain1,2,3. 1. Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia. 2. Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. 3. Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 4. Program in Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorders, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore. 5. Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Abstract
Study Objectives: To investigate sex differences in the effect of sleep deprivation on performance, accounting for menstrual phase in women. Methods: We examined alertness data from 124 healthy women and men (40 women, 84 men; aged 18-30 years) who maintained wakefulness for at least 30 hr in a laboratory setting using a constant routine protocol. Objective alertness was assessed every 2 hr using a 10 min psychomotor vigilance task. Subjective alertness was assessed every hour via the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale. Results: Women in the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle demonstrated the poorest level of performance. This poor performance was most pronounced at times corresponding to the typical sleep episode, demonstrating a window of vulnerability at night during this menstrual phase. At 24 hr awake, over 60 per cent of their responses were lapses of >500 ms and over one-third of their responses were longer lapses of at least 3 s in duration. Women in the luteal phase, however, were relatively protected from alertness failure, performing similar or better than both follicular-phase women and men. Conclusions: These results have important implications for education and intervention programs for shift workers, specifically during times of vulnerability to attentional failure that increase risk of injury.
Study Objectives: To investigate sex differences in the effect of sleep deprivation on performance, accounting for menstrual phase in women. Methods: We examined alertness data from 124 healthy women and men (40 women, 84 men; aged 18-30 years) who maintained wakefulness for at least 30 hr in a laboratory setting using a constant routine protocol. Objective alertness was assessed every 2 hr using a 10 min psychomotor vigilance task. Subjective alertness was assessed every hour via the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale. Results:Women in the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle demonstrated the poorest level of performance. This poor performance was most pronounced at times corresponding to the typical sleep episode, demonstrating a window of vulnerability at night during this menstrual phase. At 24 hr awake, over 60 per cent of their responses were lapses of >500 ms and over one-third of their responses were longer lapses of at least 3 s in duration. Women in the luteal phase, however, were relatively protected from alertness failure, performing similar or better than both follicular-phase women and men. Conclusions: These results have important implications for education and intervention programs for shift workers, specifically during times of vulnerability to attentional failure that increase risk of injury.
Authors: Nayantara Santhi; Alpar S Lazar; Patrick J McCabe; June C Lo; John A Groeger; Derk-Jan Dijk Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Céline Vetter; Elizabeth E Devore; Lani R Wegrzyn; Jennifer Massa; Frank E Speizer; Ichiro Kawachi; Bernard Rosner; Meir J Stampfer; Eva S Schernhammer Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-04-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Leilah K Grant; Joshua J Gooley; Melissa A St Hilaire; Shantha M W Rajaratnam; George C Brainard; Charles A Czeisler; Steven W Lockley; Shadab A Rahman Journal: Sleep Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Grace E Vincent; Charlotte C Gupta; Madeline Sprajcer; Corneel Vandelanotte; Mitch J Duncan; Phil Tucker; Michele Lastella; Georgia A Tuckwell; Sally A Ferguson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Saranea Ganesan; Michelle Magee; Julia E Stone; Megan D Mulhall; Allison Collins; Mark E Howard; Steven W Lockley; Shantha M W Rajaratnam; Tracey L Sletten Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Julia E Stone; Andrew J K Phillips; Suzanne Ftouni; Michelle Magee; Mark Howard; Steven W Lockley; Tracey L Sletten; Clare Anderson; Shantha M W Rajaratnam; Svetlana Postnova Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Anna W T Cai; Jessica E Manousakis; Bikram Singh; Jonny Kuo; Katherine J Jeppe; Elly Francis-Pester; Brook Shiferaw; Caroline J Beatty; Shantha M W Rajaratnam; Michael G Lenné; Mark E Howard; Clare Anderson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-11-03 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Heidi M Lammers-van der Holst; James K Wyatt; Todd S Horowitz; John C Wise; Wei Wang; Joseph M Ronda; Jeanne F Duffy; Charles A Czeisler Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2021-03-28 Impact factor: 5.024