Sae Rom Chung1, Chong Hyun Suh2, Jung Hwan Baek3, Young Jun Choi1, Jeong Hyun Lee1. 1. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Radiology, Namwon Medical Center, Namwon-si, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea. radbaek@naver.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the published literature and evaluate the efficacy and safety of core needle biopsy (CNB) for initially detected thyroid nodules. METHODS: The Ovid-MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for studies evaluating CNB for the diagnosis of initially detected thyroid nodules. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate non-diagnostic results, inconclusive results and diagnostic accuracy for a diagnosis of malignancy with CNB. To overcome heterogeneity, multiple subgroup analyses were performed. The complication rate was also evaluated. RESULTS: Thirteen eligible studies, which included a total sample size of 9,166 patients with 13,585 nodules, were included. The pooled proportions were 3.5% (95% CI 2.4-5.1) for non-diagnostic results and 13.8% (95% CI 9.1-20.3) for inconclusive results. Considerable heterogeneity was observed among the studies in terms of the pooled proportions for CNB (I2=92.9%, 97%). With regard to the diagnostic performance for malignancy, the sensitivity was 80% (95% CI 75-85) and the specificity was 100% (95% CI 93-100). Only two major complications of CNB were observed. CONCLUSIONS: CNB demonstrates a low non-diagnostic result rate and high diagnostic accuracy for initially detected thyroid nodules and a low major complication rate. These findings indicate that CNB may be a feasible diagnostic tool for patients with initially detected thyroid nodules. KEY POINTS: CNB demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for initially detected thyroid nodules. CNB demonstrates a low major complication rate. CNB may be a feasible diagnostic tool for patients with initially detected thyroid nodules.
OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the published literature and evaluate the efficacy and safety of core needle biopsy (CNB) for initially detected thyroid nodules. METHODS: The Ovid-MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for studies evaluating CNB for the diagnosis of initially detected thyroid nodules. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate non-diagnostic results, inconclusive results and diagnostic accuracy for a diagnosis of malignancy with CNB. To overcome heterogeneity, multiple subgroup analyses were performed. The complication rate was also evaluated. RESULTS: Thirteen eligible studies, which included a total sample size of 9,166 patients with 13,585 nodules, were included. The pooled proportions were 3.5% (95% CI 2.4-5.1) for non-diagnostic results and 13.8% (95% CI 9.1-20.3) for inconclusive results. Considerable heterogeneity was observed among the studies in terms of the pooled proportions for CNB (I2=92.9%, 97%). With regard to the diagnostic performance for malignancy, the sensitivity was 80% (95% CI 75-85) and the specificity was 100% (95% CI 93-100). Only two major complications of CNB were observed. CONCLUSIONS: CNB demonstrates a low non-diagnostic result rate and high diagnostic accuracy for initially detected thyroid nodules and a low major complication rate. These findings indicate that CNB may be a feasible diagnostic tool for patients with initially detected thyroid nodules. KEY POINTS: CNB demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for initially detected thyroid nodules. CNB demonstrates a low major complication rate. CNB may be a feasible diagnostic tool for patients with initially detected thyroid nodules.
Authors: Pierpaolo Trimboli; Naim Nasrollah; Stefano Amendola; Anna Crescenzi; Leo Guidobaldi; Carlo Chiesa; Riccardo Maglio; Giuseppe Nigri; Alfredo Pontecorvi; Francesco Romanelli; Laura Giacomelli; Stefano Valabrega Journal: Gland Surg Date: 2015-08
Authors: Constantine G A Theoharis; Kevin M Schofield; Lynwood Hammers; Robert Udelsman; David C Chhieng Journal: Thyroid Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Sang Hyun Choi; Jung Hwan Baek; Jeong Hyun Lee; Young Jun Choi; Min Ji Hong; Dong Eun Song; Jae Kyun Kim; Jong Ho Yoon; Won Bae Kim Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-07-20 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Young Hen Lee; Jung Hwan Baek; So Lyung Jung; Jin Young Kwak; Ji-hoon Kim; Jung Hee Shin Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Miguel Paja; Jose Luis Del Cura; Rosa Zabala; Igone Korta; Aitziber Ugalde; José I López Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-02-19 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Won Sang Yoo; Hwa Young Ahn; Hye Shin Ahn; Yun Jae Chung; Hee Sung Kim; Bo Youn Cho; Mirinae Seo; Jae Hoon Moon; Young Joo Park Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 1.817