C H Suh1,2, J H Baek3, C Park2,4, Y J Choi1, J H Lee1. 1. From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology (C.H.S., J.H.B.,Y.J.C., J.H.L.), University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Radiology (C.H.S., C.P.), Namwon Medical Center, Jeollabuk-Do, Republic of Korea. 3. From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology (C.H.S., J.H.B.,Y.J.C., J.H.L.), University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea radbaek@naver.com. 4. Department of Radiology (C.P.), Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sonography-guided fine-needle aspiration leads to relatively frequent cases of indeterminate cytology for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of core needle biopsy for the examination of thyroid nodules with initially indeterminate results on fine-needle aspiration. DATA SOURCES: A computerized search of the MEDLINE and Embase databases was performed to identify relevant original articles. STUDY SELECTION: Studies investigating the use of core needle biopsy for thyroid nodules with initially indeterminate results on previous fine-needle aspiration were eligible for inclusion. DATA ANALYSIS: The pooled proportions for nondiagnostic results, inconclusive results, malignancy on core needle biopsy, the ability of core needle biopsy to diagnose malignancy, and the related complications of the procedure were analyzed. DATA SYNTHESIS: The meta-analytic pooling was based on a random-effects model. Nine eligible studies, involving 2240 patients with 2245 thyroid nodules, were included. The pooled proportion for nondiagnostic results was 1.8% (95% CI, 0.4%-3.2%), and the pooled proportion for inconclusive results was 25.1% (95% CI, 15.4%-34.9%). The pooled proportion for malignancy was 18.9% (95% CI, 8.4%-29.5%). With regard to the diagnostic performance for malignancy, the sensitivity of core needle biopsy varied, ranging from 44.7% to 85.0%, but the specificity was 100% in all cases. No major complications of core needle biopsy were observed. LIMITATIONS: The relatively small number of included studies and retrospective nature were limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Core needle biopsy has low nondiagnostic result rates and high specificity for the diagnosis of malignancy. It is a safe diagnostic technique with a higher diagnostic yield, especially when molecular testing is not available or fine-needle aspiration did not yield enough cells for molecular testing.
BACKGROUND: Sonography-guided fine-needle aspiration leads to relatively frequent cases of indeterminate cytology for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of core needle biopsy for the examination of thyroid nodules with initially indeterminate results on fine-needle aspiration. DATA SOURCES: A computerized search of the MEDLINE and Embase databases was performed to identify relevant original articles. STUDY SELECTION: Studies investigating the use of core needle biopsy for thyroid nodules with initially indeterminate results on previous fine-needle aspiration were eligible for inclusion. DATA ANALYSIS: The pooled proportions for nondiagnostic results, inconclusive results, malignancy on core needle biopsy, the ability of core needle biopsy to diagnose malignancy, and the related complications of the procedure were analyzed. DATA SYNTHESIS: The meta-analytic pooling was based on a random-effects model. Nine eligible studies, involving 2240 patients with 2245 thyroid nodules, were included. The pooled proportion for nondiagnostic results was 1.8% (95% CI, 0.4%-3.2%), and the pooled proportion for inconclusive results was 25.1% (95% CI, 15.4%-34.9%). The pooled proportion for malignancy was 18.9% (95% CI, 8.4%-29.5%). With regard to the diagnostic performance for malignancy, the sensitivity of core needle biopsy varied, ranging from 44.7% to 85.0%, but the specificity was 100% in all cases. No major complications of core needle biopsy were observed. LIMITATIONS: The relatively small number of included studies and retrospective nature were limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Core needle biopsy has low nondiagnostic result rates and high specificity for the diagnosis of malignancy. It is a safe diagnostic technique with a higher diagnostic yield, especially when molecular testing is not available or fine-needle aspiration did not yield enough cells for molecular testing.
Authors: Ayrton Bangolo; John Bukasa Kakamba; Ali Atoot; Mohammad Jurri; Ashraf Mahmoud; Arthur Oliver Lo; Kunchang Song; Syed Sirajuddin; Adam Atoot Journal: Case Rep Endocrinol Date: 2021-12-21