Literature DB >> 29789659

Comparison of glaucoma-diagnostic ability between wide-field swept-source OCT retinal nerve fiber layer maps and spectral-domain OCT.

Won June Lee1, Sohee Oh2, Young Kook Kim3,4, Jin Wook Jeoung3,4, Ki Ho Park5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic ability of wide-field swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) maps with spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) maps for detection of preperimetric (PPG) and early glaucoma (EG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-six eyes, including 37 healthy eyes, 38 eyes with PPG, and 71 eyes with EG, were analyzed. The patients underwent both SD-OCT (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA) and wide-field SS-OCT scanning (DRI-OCT-1 Atlantis; Topcon, Tokyo, Japan). By SD-OCT, circumpapillary RNFL and macular ganglion cell analyses were performed. SS-OCT provides a wide-field RNFL thickness map and a SuperPixel map, which are composed of an RNFL deviation map of the peripapillary area and a deviation map of the composition of the ganglion cell layer with the inner plexiform layer and RNFL [GC-IPL+RNFL] in the macular area. The ability to discriminate PPG and EG from healthy eyes was assessed according to sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for parameters and criteria provided by SD-OCT and wide-field SS-OCT scanning.
RESULTS: The wide-field RNFL thickness map obtained by SS-OCT showed the highest sensitivity to PPG and EG (92.1 and 97.2%, respectively) as compared with the other, SD-OCT criteria. The wide-field RNFL thickness map showed PPG-diagnostic performance comparable to the SD-OCT RNFL thickness and GC-IPL deviation maps (p = 0.453 and 0.180), and PPG-diagnostic performance superior to the SD-OCT RNFL deviation and GC-IPL thickness maps (p = 0.003 and 0.039). In EG, the wide-field RNFL thickness and SuperPixel maps showed diagnostic performance comparable to the SD-OCT thickness and deviation maps (p = 0.065 to 0.100), except for the GC-IPL thickness map (p = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: The wide-field SS-OCT RNFL thickness maps showed a diagnostic ability for distinguishing PPG and EG from healthy eyes that was similar to that of SD-OCT. In the clinical setting, these maps can be effective for detection of early-glaucomatous changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29789659      PMCID: PMC6137103          DOI: 10.1038/s41433-018-0104-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  33 in total

1.  Diagnostic ability of retinal nerve fiber layer maps to detect localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects.

Authors:  J W Shin; K B Uhm; W J Lee; Y J Kim
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Comparison of two different spectral domain optical coherence tomography devices in the detection of localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects.

Authors:  Ko Eun Kim; Seong Joon Ahn; Dong Myung Kim
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Topographic profiles of retinal nerve fiber layer defects affect the diagnostic performance of macular scans in preperimetric glaucoma.

Authors:  Mi Jeung Kim; Jin Wook Jeoung; Ki Ho Park; Yun Jeong Choi; Dong Myung Kim
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Diagnostic Ability of Wide-field Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Maps Using Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography for Detection of Preperimetric and Early Perimetric Glaucoma.

Authors:  Won June Lee; Kyeong Ik Na; Young Kook Kim; Jin Wook Jeoung; Ki Ho Park
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Retinal nerve fiber layer.

Authors:  A Sommer
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 6.  Diagnosis of glaucoma and detection of glaucoma progression using spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Dilraj S Grewal; Angelo P Tanna
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.761

7.  Macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer measurements by spectral domain optical coherence tomography in normal-tension glaucoma.

Authors:  Mincheol Seong; Kyung Rim Sung; Eun Hee Choi; Sung Yong Kang; Jung Woo Cho; Tae Woong Um; Yoon Jeon Kim; Seong Bae Park; Hun Eui Hong; Michael S Kook
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  The nerve fiber layer in the diagnosis of glaucoma.

Authors:  A Sommer; N R Miller; I Pollack; A E Maumenee; T George
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-12

9.  Macular ganglion cell analysis for early detection of glaucoma.

Authors:  Young Hoon Hwang; Yun Cheol Jeong; Hwang Ki Kim; Yong Ho Sohn
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  An evaluation of optic disc and nerve fiber layer examinations in monitoring progression of early glaucoma damage.

Authors:  H A Quigley; J Katz; R J Derick; D Gilbert; A Sommer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Macular imaging with optical coherence tomography in glaucoma.

Authors:  Vahid Mohammadzadeh; Nima Fatehi; Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Ji Woong Lee; Farideh Sharifipour; Ramin Daneshvar; Joseph Caprioli; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  Traumatic optic neuropathy-associated progressive thinning of the retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell complex: two case reports.

Authors:  Won June Lee; Eun Hee Hong; Hae Min Park; Han Woong Lim
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.209

3.  A Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography Normative Database Considering the Fovea-Disc Relationship for Glaucoma Detection.

Authors:  Hyungjun Kim; Jong Sub Lee; Hae Min Park; Hyunsoo Cho; Han Woong Lim; Mincheol Seong; Junhong Park; Won June Lee
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Precision and Agreement of Individual and Simultaneous Macular and Optic Disc Volumetric Measurements With Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Alberto Domínguez-Vicent; Jesper Kensén; Marika Wahlberg Ramsay; Rune Brautaset; Abinaya Priya Venkataraman
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-25

5.  Combined wide-field optical coherence tomography angiography density map for high myopic glaucoma detection.

Authors:  Yu Jeong Kim; Kyeong Ik Na; Han Woong Lim; Mincheol Seong; Won June Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The OCT RNFL Probability Map and Artifacts Resembling Glaucomatous Damage.

Authors:  Sol La Bruna; Anvit Rai; Grace Mao; Jennifer Kerr; Heer Amin; Zane Z Zemborain; Ari Leshno; Emmanouil Tsamis; Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Donald C Hood
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Widefield OCT Imaging for Quantifying Inner Retinal Thickness in the Nonhuman Primate.

Authors:  Varsha Venkata Srinivasan; Siddarth Das; Nimesh Patel
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.048

8.  Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Values Using Spectral-Domain and Swept-Source OCT.

Authors:  Alessandro Rabiolo; Federico Fantaguzzi; Giovanni Montesano; Maria Brambati; Riccardo Sacconi; Francesco Gelormini; Giacinto Triolo; Paolo Bettin; Giuseppe Querques; Francesco Bandello
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.048

9.  Comparison of Diagnostic Ability Between Wide-Field Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging Maps and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 Optic Nerve Head Assessment to Discriminate Glaucomatous and Non-glaucomatous Eyes.

Authors:  Dimitrios Kourkoutas; George Triantafyllopoulos; Iordanis Georgiou; Aristotelis Karamaounas; Nikolaos Karamaounas; Konstadinos Sotiropulos; Dimitrios Kapralos
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.