Jennifer A Sinnott1, Fiona Cai2, Sheng Yu3,4, Boris P Hejblum5, Chuan Hong6, Isaac S Kohane7,8, Katherine P Liao9. 1. Department of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. 2. Stuyvesant High School, New York City, NY, USA. 3. Center for Statistical Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. 4. Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. 5. Univ. Bordeaux, ISPED, Inserm BPH 1219, Inria SISTM, Bordeaux, France. 6. Department of Biostatistics, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA. 7. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 8. Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA, USA. 9. Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
Objective: Standard approaches for large scale phenotypic screens using electronic health record (EHR) data apply thresholds, such as ≥2 diagnosis codes, to define subjects as having a phenotype. However, the variation in the accuracy of diagnosis codes can impair the power of such screens. Our objective was to develop and evaluate an approach which converts diagnosis codes into a probability of a phenotype (PheProb). We hypothesized that this alternate approach for defining phenotypes would improve power for genetic association studies. Methods: The PheProb approach employs unsupervised clustering to separate patients into 2 groups based on diagnosis codes. Subjects are assigned a probability of having the phenotype based on the number of diagnosis codes. This approach was developed using simulated EHR data and tested in a real world EHR cohort. In the latter, we tested the association between low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) genetic risk alleles known for association with hyperlipidemia and hyperlipidemia codes (ICD-9 272.x). PheProb and thresholding approaches were compared. Results: Among n = 1462 subjects in the real world EHR cohort, the threshold-based p-values for association between the genetic risk score (GRS) and hyperlipidemia were 0.126 (≥1 code), 0.123 (≥2 codes), and 0.142 (≥3 codes). The PheProb approach produced the expected significant association between the GRS and hyperlipidemia: p = .001. Conclusions: PheProb improves statistical power for association studies relative to standard thresholding approaches by leveraging information about the phenotype in the billing code counts. The PheProb approach has direct applications where efficient approaches are required, such as in Phenome-Wide Association Studies.
Objective: Standard approaches for large scale phenotypic screens using electronic health record (EHR) data apply thresholds, such as ≥2 diagnosis codes, to define subjects as having a phenotype. However, the variation in the accuracy of diagnosis codes can impair the power of such screens. Our objective was to develop and evaluate an approach which converts diagnosis codes into a probability of a phenotype (PheProb). We hypothesized that this alternate approach for defining phenotypes would improve power for genetic association studies. Methods: The PheProb approach employs unsupervised clustering to separate patients into 2 groups based on diagnosis codes. Subjects are assigned a probability of having the phenotype based on the number of diagnosis codes. This approach was developed using simulated EHR data and tested in a real world EHR cohort. In the latter, we tested the association between low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) genetic risk alleles known for association with hyperlipidemia and hyperlipidemia codes (ICD-9 272.x). PheProb and thresholding approaches were compared. Results: Among n = 1462 subjects in the real world EHR cohort, the threshold-based p-values for association between the genetic risk score (GRS) and hyperlipidemia were 0.126 (≥1 code), 0.123 (≥2 codes), and 0.142 (≥3 codes). The PheProb approach produced the expected significant association between the GRS and hyperlipidemia: p = .001. Conclusions: PheProb improves statistical power for association studies relative to standard thresholding approaches by leveraging information about the phenotype in the billing code counts. The PheProb approach has direct applications where efficient approaches are required, such as in Phenome-Wide Association Studies.
Authors: Khader Shameer; Joshua C Denny; Keyue Ding; Hayan Jouni; David R Crosslin; Mariza de Andrade; Christopher G Chute; Peggy Peissig; Jennifer A Pacheco; Rongling Li; Lisa Bastarache; Abel N Kho; Marylyn D Ritchie; Daniel R Masys; Rex L Chisholm; Eric B Larson; Catherine A McCarty; Dan M Roden; Gail P Jarvik; Iftikhar J Kullo Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2013-09-12 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Hua Xu; Min Jiang; Matt Oetjens; Erica A Bowton; Andrea H Ramirez; Janina M Jeff; Melissa A Basford; Jill M Pulley; James D Cowan; Xiaoming Wang; Marylyn D Ritchie; Daniel R Masys; Dan M Roden; Dana C Crawford; Joshua C Denny Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Jennifer A Sinnott; Wei Dai; Katherine P Liao; Stanley Y Shaw; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Vivian S Gainer; Elizabeth W Karlson; Susanne Churchill; Peter Szolovits; Shawn Murphy; Isaac Kohane; Robert Plenge; Tianxi Cai Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2014-07-26 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Joshua C Denny; Marylyn D Ritchie; Melissa A Basford; Jill M Pulley; Lisa Bastarache; Kristin Brown-Gentry; Deede Wang; Dan R Masys; Dan M Roden; Dana C Crawford Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2010-03-24 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Jason H Karnes; Lisa Bastarache; Christian M Shaffer; Silvana Gaudieri; Yaomin Xu; Andrew M Glazer; Jonathan D Mosley; Shilin Zhao; Soumya Raychaudhuri; Simon Mallal; Zhan Ye; John G Mayer; Murray H Brilliant; Scott J Hebbring; Dan M Roden; Elizabeth J Phillips; Joshua C Denny Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Anurag Verma; Anna O Basile; Yuki Bradford; Helena Kuivaniemi; Gerard Tromp; David Carey; Glenn S Gerhard; James E Crowe; Marylyn D Ritchie; Sarah A Pendergrass Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marylyn D Ritchie; Joshua C Denny; Rebecca L Zuvich; Dana C Crawford; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Lisa Bastarache; Andrea H Ramirez; Jonathan D Mosley; Jill M Pulley; Melissa A Basford; Yuki Bradford; Luke V Rasmussen; Jyotishman Pathak; Christopher G Chute; Iftikhar J Kullo; Catherine A McCarty; Rex L Chisholm; Abel N Kho; Christopher S Carlson; Eric B Larson; Gail P Jarvik; Nona Sotoodehnia; Teri A Manolio; Rongling Li; Daniel R Masys; Jonathan L Haines; Dan M Roden Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Robert M Cronin; Julie R Field; Yuki Bradford; Christian M Shaffer; Robert J Carroll; Jonathan D Mosley; Lisa Bastarache; Todd L Edwards; Scott J Hebbring; Simon Lin; Lucia A Hindorff; Paul K Crane; Sarah A Pendergrass; Marylyn D Ritchie; Dana C Crawford; Jyotishman Pathak; Suzette J Bielinski; David S Carrell; David R Crosslin; David H Ledbetter; David J Carey; Gerard Tromp; Marc S Williams; Eric B Larson; Gail P Jarvik; Peggy L Peissig; Murray H Brilliant; Catherine A McCarty; Christopher G Chute; Iftikhar J Kullo; Erwin Bottinger; Rex Chisholm; Maureen E Smith; Dan M Roden; Joshua C Denny Journal: Front Genet Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Tianxi Cai; Yichi Zhang; Yuk-Lam Ho; Nicholas Link; Jiehuan Sun; Jie Huang; Tianrun A Cai; Scott Damrauer; Yuri Ahuja; Jacqueline Honerlaw; Jie Huang; Lauren Costa; Petra Schubert; Chuan Hong; David Gagnon; Yan V Sun; J Michael Gaziano; Peter Wilson; Kelly Cho; Philip Tsao; Christopher J O'Donnell; Katherine P Liao Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Lina Sulieman; Robert M Cronin; Robert J Carroll; Karthik Natarajan; Kayla Marginean; Brandy Mapes; Dan Roden; Paul Harris; Andrea Ramirez Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2022-06-14 Impact factor: 7.942
Authors: Chenjie Zeng; Lisa A Bastarache; Ran Tao; Eric Venner; Scott Hebbring; Justin D Andujar; Sarah T Bland; David R Crosslin; Siddharth Pratap; Ayorinde Cooley; Jennifer A Pacheco; Kurt D Christensen; Emma Perez; Carrie L Blout Zawatsky; Leora Witkowski; Hana Zouk; Chunhua Weng; Kathleen A Leppig; Patrick M A Sleiman; Hakon Hakonarson; Marc S Williams; Yuan Luo; Gail P Jarvik; Robert C Green; Wendy K Chung; Ali G Gharavi; Niall J Lennon; Heidi L Rehm; Richard A Gibbs; Josh F Peterson; Dan M Roden; Georgia L Wiesner; Joshua C Denny Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 33.006
Authors: Phyllis M Thangaraj; Benjamin R Kummer; Tal Lorberbaum; Mitchell S V Elkind; Nicholas P Tatonetti Journal: BioData Min Date: 2020-12-07 Impact factor: 2.522