Literature DB >> 29788145

Long-Term Outcome of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: 20 Years of Experience With 224 Consecutive Patients.

Mette Nissen1, Tiina-Mari Ikäheimo1, Jukka Huttunen1, Ville Leinonen1, Mikael von Und Zu Fraunberg1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a challenging condition that lacks a curative treatment. In selected patients, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has provided a satisfactory outcome.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term outcome of SCS in FBSS, as measured by (1) the explantation rate, (2) complications, and (3) patient satisfaction with the global perceived effect (GPE).
METHODS: We studied 224 consecutive FBSS patients who underwent an SCS trial with surgically implanted leads at our hospital between January 1996 and December 2014. The patients' satisfaction with the GPE of treatment was measured through a postal questionnaire at the end of follow-up.
RESULTS: Based on a 1-wk trial, permanent SCS was implanted in 175 (78%) patients. Out of these patients, 153 (87%) reported satisfactory outcomes after 2 mo. During the mean follow-up of 6 yr, 34 (19%) of SCS devices were permanently explanted due to inadequate pain relief, and 11 (6%) were explanted for other reasons.Electrode revision due to inadequate pain relief was done for 22 patients. In total, 26 complications were reported due to: 7 deep infections, 11 hardware malfunctions, 1 subcutaneous hematoma, 4 instances of discomfort due to the pulse generator, and 3 electrode migrations.One hundred thirty patients (74%) continued with SCS until the end of follow-up. Of them, 61 (47%) returned the questionnaire, and 42 (69%) reported substantially improved or better GPE.
CONCLUSION: SCS can provide a good outcome in the treatment of FBSS. Patient selection could be further improved by developing novel predictive biomarkers.
Copyright © 2018 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Failed back surgery syndrome; Long-term outcome; Retrospective observational study; Spinal cord stimulation; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29788145     DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  12 in total

1.  Development of Machine Learning-Based Models to Predict Treatment Response to Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Amir Hadanny; Tessa Harland; Olga Khazen; Marisa DiMarzio; Anthony Marchese; Ilknur Telkes; Vishad Sukul; Julie G Pilitsis
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Effect of Spinal Cord Stimulation on Early Disability Pension in 198 Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Patients: Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Hanna Kaijankoski; Mette Nissen; Tiina-Mari Ikäheimo; Mikael von Und Zu Fraunberg; Olavi Airaksinen; Jukka Huttunen
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Clinical Outcomes after Spinal Cord Stimulation According to Pain Characteristics.

Authors:  Jong-Ho Ha; Ryoong Huh; Shin-Gyeom Kim; Soo-Bin Im; Je Hoon Jeong; Sun-Chul Hwang; Dong-Seong Shin; Bum-Tae Kim; Moonyoung Chung
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2022-01-04

Review 4.  Therapeutic Devices for Motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease: Current Progress and a Systematic Review of Recent Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Joji Fujikawa; Ryoma Morigaki; Nobuaki Yamamoto; Teruo Oda; Hiroshi Nakanishi; Yuishin Izumi; Yasushi Takagi
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 5.702

5.  The Use of Remote Programming for Spinal Cord Stimulation for Patients With Chronic Pain During the COVID-19 Outbreak in China.

Authors:  Yan Han; Yang Lu; Dengyu Wang; Mingshan Ran; Qidong Ren; Duo Xie; Tipu Z Aziz; Luming Li; James Jin Wang
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-03-22

Review 6.  A Retrospective Review of Lead Migration Rate in Patients Permanently Implanted with Percutaneous Leads and a 10 kHz SCS Device.

Authors:  Mayank Gupta; Alaa Abd-Elsayed; Meghan Hughes; Anand Rotte
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.037

7.  Higher Preimplantation Opioid Doses Associated With Long-Term Spinal Cord Stimulation Failure in 211 Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.

Authors:  Mette Nissen; Tiina-Mari Ikäheimo; Jukka Huttunen; Ville Leinonen; Henna-Kaisa Jyrkkänen; Mikael von Und Zu Fraunberg
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-10-19

8.  Experiences From the Patient Perspective on Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Qualitatively Driven Mixed Method Analysis.

Authors:  Richard L Witkam; Erkan Kurt; Robert van Dongen; Inge Arnts; Monique A H Steegers; Kris C P Vissers; Dylan J H A Henssen; Yvonne Engels
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-09-23

Review 9.  Effects of Dorsal Column Spinal Cord Stimulation on Neuroinflammation: Revisiting Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Outcomes on Chronic Lumbar/Leg Pain and Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.

Authors:  Marco Echeverria-Villalobos; Justin Mitchell; Juan Fiorda-Diaz; Tristan Weaver
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 3.133

10.  Novel Intermittent Dosing Burst Paradigm in Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Timothy R Deer; Denis G Patterson; Javid Baksh; Jason E Pope; Pankaj Mehta; Adil Raza; Filippo Agnesi; Krishnan V Chakravarthy
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-03-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.