Literature DB >> 29788130

Patient Barriers and Facilitators to Ambulatory and Home Blood Pressure Monitoring: A Qualitative Study.

Eileen J Carter1,2, Nathalie Moise3, Carmela Alcántara4, Alexandra M Sullivan3, Ian M Kronish3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend that patients with newly elevated office blood pressure undergo ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) or home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) to rule-out white coat hypertension before being diagnosed with hypertension. We explored patients' perspectives of the barriers and facilitators to undergoing ABPM or HBPM.
METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with twenty English- and Spanish-speaking individuals from underserved communities in New York City. Two researchers analyzed transcripts using a conventional content analysis to identify barriers and facilitators to participation in ABPM and HBPM.
RESULTS: Participants described favorable attitudes toward testing including readily understanding white coat hypertension, agreeing with the rationale for out-of-office testing, and believing that testing would benefit patients. Regarding ABPM, participants expressed concerns over the representativeness of the day the test was performed and the intrusiveness of the frequent readings. Regarding HBPM, participants expressed concerns over the validity of the monitoring method and the reliability of home blood pressure devices. For both tests, participants noted that out-of-pocket costs may deter patient participation and felt that patients would require detailed information about the test itself before deciding to participate. Participants overwhelmingly believed that out-of-office testing benefits outweighed testing barriers, were confident that they could successfully complete either testing if recommended by their provider, and described the rationale for their testing preference.
CONCLUSIONS: Participants identified dominant barriers and facilitators to ABPM and HBPM testing, articulated testing preferences, and believed that they could successfully complete out-of-office testing if recommended by their provider.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29788130      PMCID: PMC7190918          DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpy062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  27 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic and predictive accuracy of blood pressure screening methods with consideration of rescreening intervals: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Margaret A Piper; Corinne V Evans; Brittany U Burda; Karen L Margolis; Elizabeth O'Connor; Evelyn P Whitlock
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; Carol L Bennett; Michael J Barry; Nananda F Col; Karen B Eden; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Anne Lyddiatt; France Légaré; Richard Thomson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-10-05

3.  How patient centered are medical decisions?: Results of a national survey.

Authors:  Floyd J Fowler; Bethany S Gerstein; Michael J Barry
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Home blood pressure monitoring and hypertension status among US adults: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2009-2010.

Authors:  Yechiam Ostchega; Lewis Berman; Jeffery P Hughes; Te-Ching Chen; Michele M Chiappa
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.689

5.  Attitudes of primary care providers and recommendations of home blood pressure monitoring--DocStyles, 2010.

Authors:  Jill Tirabassi; Jing Fang; Carma Ayala
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Factors associated with probability of patient rejecting a repeat 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, despite recommendation by the physician.

Authors:  Lindsey Elliot; Pervaiz Iqbal
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.444

7.  Regular use of a home blood pressure monitor by hypertensive adults--HealthStyles, 2005 and 2008.

Authors:  Carma Ayala; Xin Tong; Nora L Keenan
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Tolerability of the Oscar 2 ambulatory blood pressure monitor among research participants: a cross-sectional repeated measures study.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Kara Lingley; Alan L Hinderliter
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 9.  2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Paul K Whelton; Robert M Carey; Wilbert S Aronow; Donald E Casey; Karen J Collins; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Sondra M DePalma; Samuel Gidding; Kenneth A Jamerson; Daniel W Jones; Eric J MacLaughlin; Paul Muntner; Bruce Ovbiagele; Sidney C Smith; Crystal C Spencer; Randall S Stafford; Sandra J Taler; Randal J Thomas; Kim A Williams; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 9.897

10.  Implementation of Out-of-Office Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Netherlands: From Clinical Guidelines to Patients' Adoption of Innovation.

Authors:  Pricivel M Carrera; Mattijs S Lambooij
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

View more
  7 in total

1.  Is Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Effective at Controlling Hypertension in African American Patients? A Clin-IQ.

Authors:  Rebecca Nye; Wilhelm Lehmann; Deborah Simpson
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2022-07-18

2.  Reliability of Office, Home, and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements and Correlation With Left Ventricular Mass.

Authors:  Joseph E Schwartz; Paul Muntner; Ian M Kronish; Matthew M Burg; Thomas G Pickering; John Thomas Bigger; Daichi Shimbo
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Are Community Health Center Patients Interested in Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring (SMBP) - And Can They Do It?

Authors:  Debosree Roy; Margaret Meador; Nana Sasu; Kate Whelihan; Joy H Lewis
Journal:  Integr Blood Press Control       Date:  2021-02-12

Review 4.  How Should We Measure and Deal with Office Blood Pressure in 2021?

Authors:  Annina S Vischer; Thilo Burkard
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-03

5.  Home blood-pressure measurement for the diagnosis and monitoring of arterial hypertension by French general practitioners: a cross-sectional survey in the Auvergne region.

Authors:  Mangiavillano Xavier; Tréfond Jéromine; Plaquevent-Hostache Guillaume; Tanguy Gilles; Bœuf-Gibot Sylvaine; Mulliez Aurélien; Vorilhon Philippe
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Design and study protocol for a cluster randomized trial of a multi-faceted implementation strategy to increase the uptake of the USPSTF hypertension screening recommendations: the EMBRACE study.

Authors:  Nathalie Moise; Erica Phillips; Eileen Carter; Carmela Alcantara; Jacob Julian; Anusorn Thanataveerat; Joseph E Schwartz; Siqin Ye; Andrea Duran; Daichi Shimbo; Ian M Kronish
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Impact of Self-Monitoring of Blood Pressure on Processes of Hypertension Care and Long-Term Blood Pressure Control.

Authors:  Kelsey B Bryant; James P Sheppard; Natalia Ruiz-Negrón; Ian M Kronish; Valy Fontil; Jordan B King; Mark J Pletcher; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Andrew E Moran; Richard J McManus; Brandon K Bellows
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 5.501

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.