IMPORTANCE: Informing and involving patients in their medical decisions is increasingly becoming a standard for good medical care, particularly for primary care physicians. OBJECTIVE: To learn how patients describe the decision-making process for 10 common medical decisions, including 6 that are most often made in primary care. DESIGN: A survey of a national sample of adults 40 years or older who in the preceding 2 years had either experienced or discussed with a health care provider 1 or more of 10 decisions: medication for hypertension, elevated cholesterol, or depression; screening for breast, prostate, or colon cancer; knee or hip replacement for osteoarthritis, or surgery for cataract or low back pain. SETTING: Adults living in households in the United States in 2011. PARTICIPANTS: A national sample of adults drawn from a probability sample-based web panel developed by Knowledge Networks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patients' perceptions of the extent to which the pros and cons were discussed with their health care providers, whether the patients were told they had a choice, and whether the patients were asked for their input. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 2718 patients, with a response rate of 58.3%. Respondents reported much more discussion of the pros than the cons of all tests or treatments; discussions about the surgical procedures tended to be more balanced than those about medications to reduce cardiac risks and cancer screening. Most patients (60%-78%) said they were asked for input for all but 3 decisions: medications for hypertension and elevated cholesterol and having mammograms (37.3%-42.7%). Overall, the reported decision-making processes were most patient centered for back or knee replacement surgery and least for breast and prostate cancer screening. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Discussions about these common tests, medications, and procedures as reported by patients do not reflect a high level of shared decision making, particularly for 5 decisions most often made in primary care.
IMPORTANCE: Informing and involving patients in their medical decisions is increasingly becoming a standard for good medical care, particularly for primary care physicians. OBJECTIVE: To learn how patients describe the decision-making process for 10 common medical decisions, including 6 that are most often made in primary care. DESIGN: A survey of a national sample of adults 40 years or older who in the preceding 2 years had either experienced or discussed with a health care provider 1 or more of 10 decisions: medication for hypertension, elevated cholesterol, or depression; screening for breast, prostate, or colon cancer; knee or hip replacement for osteoarthritis, or surgery for cataract or low back pain. SETTING: Adults living in households in the United States in 2011. PARTICIPANTS: A national sample of adults drawn from a probability sample-based web panel developed by Knowledge Networks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patients' perceptions of the extent to which the pros and cons were discussed with their health care providers, whether the patients were told they had a choice, and whether the patients were asked for their input. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 2718 patients, with a response rate of 58.3%. Respondents reported much more discussion of the pros than the cons of all tests or treatments; discussions about the surgical procedures tended to be more balanced than those about medications to reduce cardiac risks and cancer screening. Most patients (60%-78%) said they were asked for input for all but 3 decisions: medications for hypertension and elevated cholesterol and having mammograms (37.3%-42.7%). Overall, the reported decision-making processes were most patient centered for back or knee replacement surgery and least for breast and prostate cancer screening. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Discussions about these common tests, medications, and procedures as reported by patients do not reflect a high level of shared decision making, particularly for 5 decisions most often made in primary care.
Authors: Andrea C Villanti; Shelly Naud; Julia C West; Jennifer L Pearson; Olivia A Wackowski; Raymond S Niaura; Elizabeth Hair; Jessica M Rath Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Andrea C Villanti; Amanda L Johnson; Jessica M Rath; Valerie Williams; Donna M Vallone; David B Abrams; Donald Hedeker; Robin J Mermelstein Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Rebecca Blankenburg; Joan F Hilton; Patrick Yuan; Stephanie Rennke; Brad Monash; Stephanie M Harman; Debbie S Sakai; Poonam Hosamani; Adeena Khan; Ian Chua; Eric Huynh; Lisa Shieh; Lijia Xie Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Deborah J Rhodes; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss; Sarah M Jenkins; Celine M Vachon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-03-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrea C Villanti; Shelly Naud; Julia C West; Jennifer L Pearson; Olivia A Wackowski; Elizabeth Hair; Raymond S Niaura; Jessica M Rath Journal: Prev Med Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Lori L DuBenske; Sarina B Schrager; Mary E Hitchcock; Amanda K Kane; Terry A Little; Helene E McDowell; Elizabeth S Burnside Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Robert M Carey; David A Calhoun; George L Bakris; Robert D Brook; Stacie L Daugherty; Cheryl R Dennison-Himmelfarb; Brent M Egan; John M Flack; Samuel S Gidding; Eric Judd; Daniel T Lackland; Cheryl L Laffer; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Steven M Smith; Sandra J Taler; Stephen C Textor; Tanya N Turan; William B White Journal: Hypertension Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 10.190