Literature DB >> 29787889

Diagnosis of bloodstream infections from positive blood cultures and directly from blood samples: recent developments in molecular approaches.

N Peker1, N Couto1, B Sinha1, J W Rossen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections are a major cause of death with increasing incidence and severity. Blood cultures are still the reference standard for microbiological diagnosis, but are rather slow. Molecular methods can be used as add-on complementary assays. They can be useful to speed up microbial identification and to predict antimicrobial susceptibility, applied to direct blood samples or positive blood cultures. AIM: To review recent developments in molecular-based diagnostic platforms used for the identification of bloodstream infections, with a focus on assays performed directly on blood samples and positive blood cultures. SOURCES: Peer reviewed articles, conference abstracts, and manufacturers' websites. CONTENT: We give an update on recent developments of molecular methods in diagnosing BSIs. We first describe the currently available molecular methods to be used for positive blood cultures including: a) in situ hybridization-based methods; b) DNA-microarray-based hybridization technology; c) nucleic acid amplification-based methods; and d) combined methods. Subsequently, molecular methods applied directly to whole blood samples are discussed, including the use of nucleic acid amplification-based methods, T2 magnetic resonance-based methods, and metagenomics for diagnosing BSIs. IMPLICATIONS: Advances in molecular-based methods complementary to conventional blood culture diagnostics and antimicrobial stewardship programmes may optimize infection management by allowing rapid identification of pathogens and relevant antimicrobial resistance genes. Rapid diagnosis of the causing microorganism and relevant resistance determinants is important for early administration and modification of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Ultimately, this may lead to improved quality and cost-effectiveness of health care, as well as reduced antimicrobial resistance selection.
Copyright © 2018 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Blood culture; Blood pathogens; Bloodstream infections; Diagnostic stewardship; Microbial identification; Molecular diagnostics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29787889     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  42 in total

1.  Laboratory automation reduces time to report of positive blood cultures and improves management of patients with bloodstream infection.

Authors:  Giuseppe Vittorio De Socio; Francesco Di Donato; Riccardo Paggi; Chiara Gabrielli; Alessandra Belati; Giuseppe Rizza; Martina Savoia; Antonella Repetto; Elio Cenci; Antonella Mencacci
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Rapid detection of antimicrobial resistance markers with Allplex™ Entero-DR assay directly from positive blood culture bottles.

Authors:  Paavo Hannus; Kati Räisänen; Jari J Martelin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Improved blood culture workflow in the time to detection of microorganisms placing incubators systems outside of microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  M Angeles Orellana; Fernando Chaves; Rafael Delgado
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.476

4.  The Impact of Fast Microbiology in Intensive Care Units in the Era of Antibiotic Resistance: An Observational Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Mirko Muzzi; Bruno Viaggi; Sergio Fabbri; Lorenzo Bechi; Caterina Scirè-Calabrisotto; Gianluca Villa; Stefano Romagnoli
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  A culture-free biphasic approach for sensitive and rapid detection of pathogens in dried whole-blood matrix.

Authors:  Anurup Ganguli; Jongwon Lim; Ariana Mostafa; Carlos Saavedra; Archith Rayabharam; Narayana R Aluru; Matthew Wester; Karen C White; James Kumar; Reubin McGuffin; Ann Frederick; Enrique Valera; Rashid Bashir
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 6.  Sequencing-based methods and resources to study antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Manish Boolchandani; Alaric W D'Souza; Gautam Dantas
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Educational Case: Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Utilization of Rapid Diagnostics for Bloodstream Pathogen Identification and Prediction of Antimicrobial Susceptibility.

Authors:  Carlos A Castrodad-Rodríguez; Erika P Orner; Wendy A Szymczak
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2021-05-12

8.  Assessment of rapid direct E-test on positive blood culture for same-day antimicrobial susceptibility.

Authors:  Gabriele Bianco; Marco Iannaccone; Matteo Boattini; Rossana Cavallo; Cristina Costa
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.476

9.  Scanning Electron Microscope: A New Potential Tool to Replace Gram Staining for Microbe Identification in Blood Cultures.

Authors:  Gabriel Haddad; Sara Bellali; Tatsuki Takakura; Anthony Fontanini; Yusuke Ominami; Jacques Bou Khalil; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-05-28

10.  Direct detection of ESKAPEc pathogens from whole blood using the T2Bacteria Panel allows early antimicrobial stewardship intervention in patients with sepsis.

Authors:  Pavel Drevinek; Jakub Hurych; Milena Antuskova; Jan Tkadlec; Jan Berousek; Zuzana Prikrylova; Jiri Bures; Jaromir Vajter; Martin Soucek; Jan Masopust; Vendula Martinkova; Jaroslava Adamkova; Veronika Hysperska; Eliska Bebrova
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.