Literature DB >> 29787382

Machine learning-based dual-energy CT parametric mapping.

Kuan-Hao Su1, Jung-Wen Kuo, David W Jordan, Steven Van Hedent, Paul Klahr, Zhouping Wei, Rose Al Helo, Fan Liang, Pengjiang Qian, Gisele C Pereira, Negin Rassouli, Robert C Gilkeson, Bryan J Traughber, Chee-Wai Cheng, Raymond F Muzic.   

Abstract

The aim is to develop and evaluate machine learning methods for generating quantitative parametric maps of effective atomic number (Zeff), relative electron density (ρ e), mean excitation energy (I x ), and relative stopping power (RSP) from clinical dual-energy CT data. The maps could be used for material identification and radiation dose calculation. Machine learning methods of historical centroid (HC), random forest (RF), and artificial neural networks (ANN) were used to learn the relationship between dual-energy CT input data and ideal output parametric maps calculated for phantoms from the known compositions of 13 tissue substitutes. After training and model selection steps, the machine learning predictors were used to generate parametric maps from independent phantom and patient input data. Precision and accuracy were evaluated using the ideal maps. This process was repeated for a range of exposure doses, and performance was compared to that of the clinically-used dual-energy, physics-based method which served as the reference. The machine learning methods generated more accurate and precise parametric maps than those obtained using the reference method. Their performance advantage was particularly evident when using data from the lowest exposure, one-fifth of a typical clinical abdomen CT acquisition. The RF method achieved the greatest accuracy. In comparison, the ANN method was only 1% less accurate but had much better computational efficiency than RF, being able to produce parametric maps in 15 s. Machine learning methods outperformed the reference method in terms of accuracy and noise tolerance when generating parametric maps, encouraging further exploration of the techniques. Among the methods we evaluated, ANN is the most suitable for clinical use due to its combination of accuracy, excellent low-noise performance, and computational efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29787382     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aac711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

Review 1.  Status and innovations in pre-treatment CT imaging for proton therapy.

Authors:  Patrick Wohlfahrt; Christian Richter
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Learning-based synthetic dual energy CT imaging from single energy CT for stopping power ratio calculation in proton radiation therapy.

Authors:  Serdar Charyyev; Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Beth Ghavidel; Jonathan J Beitler; Mark McDonald; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Jun Zhou; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Dual-energy CT-based deep learning radiomics can improve lymph node metastasis risk prediction for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jing Li; Di Dong; Mengjie Fang; Rui Wang; Jie Tian; Hailiang Li; Jianbo Gao
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Feasibility of using post-contrast dual-energy CT for pediatric radiation treatment planning and dose calculation.

Authors:  Ozgur Ates; Chia-Ho Hua; Li Zhao; Nadav Shapira; Yoad Yagil; Thomas E Merchant; Matthew Krasin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Learning-Based Stopping Power Mapping on Dual-Energy CT for Proton Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Joseph Harms; Beth Ghavidel; Liyong Lin; Jonathan J Beitler; Mark McDonald; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Jun Zhou; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2021-02-12

Review 6.  Improving radiation physics, tumor visualisation, and treatment quantification in radiotherapy with spectral or dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Matthijs Ferdinand Kruis
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.