Franziska U C E Jung1,2,3, Claudia Luck-Sikorski4,5, Hans-Helmut König6, Steffi G Riedel-Heller4. 1. Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), University of Leipzig, Ph.-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. franziska.jung@medizin.uni-leipzig.de. 2. IFB Adiposity Diseases, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany. franziska.jung@medizin.uni-leipzig.de. 3. Competence Cluster for Nutrition and Cardiovascular Health (nutriCARD), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. franziska.jung@medizin.uni-leipzig.de. 4. Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), University of Leipzig, Ph.-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. 5. IFB Adiposity Diseases, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany. 6. Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite reported effectiveness, weight loss surgery (WLS) still remains one of the least preferred options for outpatient providers, especially in Germany. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of stigma and knowledge on recommendation of WLS and referral to a surgeon by general practitioners (GPs) and internists. METHOD: The sample consists of 201 GPs and internists from Germany. The questionnaire included questions on the perceived effectiveness of WLS, the frequency of recommendations of WLS, and the frequency of referral to WLS. Stigma, as well as knowledge was also assessed in this context. Linear and logistic regression models were conducted. A mediation analysis was carried out within post hoc analysis. RESULTS: Knowledge (b = 0.258, p < 0.001) and stigma towards surgery (b = -0.129, p = 0.013) were related to the frequency of recommendation of WLS. Additionally, respondents, who were more likely to express negative attitudes towards WLS, were less likely to recommend WLS and thus refer patients to WLS (b = -0.107, p < 0.05). Furthermore, respondents with more expertise on WLS were more likely to recommend and thus refer patients to WLS (b = 0.026, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study showed that stigma plays a role when it comes to defining treatment pathways for patients with obesity. The question remains how this might influence the patients and their decision regarding their treatment selection. Interventions are required to make treatment decisions by physicians or patients independent of social pressure due to stigma.
BACKGROUND: Despite reported effectiveness, weight loss surgery (WLS) still remains one of the least preferred options for outpatient providers, especially in Germany. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of stigma and knowledge on recommendation of WLS and referral to a surgeon by general practitioners (GPs) and internists. METHOD: The sample consists of 201 GPs and internists from Germany. The questionnaire included questions on the perceived effectiveness of WLS, the frequency of recommendations of WLS, and the frequency of referral to WLS. Stigma, as well as knowledge was also assessed in this context. Linear and logistic regression models were conducted. A mediation analysis was carried out within post hoc analysis. RESULTS: Knowledge (b = 0.258, p < 0.001) and stigma towards surgery (b = -0.129, p = 0.013) were related to the frequency of recommendation of WLS. Additionally, respondents, who were more likely to express negative attitudes towards WLS, were less likely to recommend WLS and thus refer patients to WLS (b = -0.107, p < 0.05). Furthermore, respondents with more expertise on WLS were more likely to recommend and thus refer patients to WLS (b = 0.026, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study showed that stigma plays a role when it comes to defining treatment pathways for patients with obesity. The question remains how this might influence the patients and their decision regarding their treatment selection. Interventions are required to make treatment decisions by physicians or patients independent of social pressure due to stigma.
Entities:
Keywords:
General practitioners; Internists; Obesity; Stigma; Weight loss surgery
Authors: Melinda A Maggard; Lisa R Shugarman; Marika Suttorp; Margaret Maglione; Harvey J Sugerman; Harvey J Sugarman; Edward H Livingston; Ninh T Nguyen; Zhaoping Li; Walter A Mojica; Lara Hilton; Shannon Rhodes; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2005-04-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Philip R Schauer; Deepak L Bhatt; John P Kirwan; Kathy Wolski; Stacy A Brethauer; Sankar D Navaneethan; Ali Aminian; Claire E Pothier; Esther S H Kim; Steven E Nissen; Sangeeta R Kashyap Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christopher H Warner; Carolynn M Warner; Joshua Morganstein; George N Appenzeller; James Rachal; Thomas Grieger Journal: Mil Med Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: J Picot; J Jones; J L Colquitt; E Gospodarevskaya; E Loveman; L Baxter; A J Clegg Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Franziska Ulrike Christine Else Jung; A Dietrich; C Stroh; S G Riedel-Heller; C Luck-Sikorski Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Eliza A Conaty; Woody Denham; Stephen P Haggerty; John G Linn; Raymond J Joehl; Michael B Ujiki Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Karolina Zawadzka; Krzysztof Więckowski; Tomasz Stefura; Piotr Major; Magdalena Szopa Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-04-05 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Christian Tapking; Laura Benner; Matthes Hackbusch; Svenja Schüler; Danny Tran; Gregor B Ottawa; Katja Krug; Beat P Müller-Stich; Lars Fischer; Felix Nickel Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-08-09 Impact factor: 4.129