Literature DB >> 29785218

Molecular Study of Quinolone Resistance Determining Regions of gyrA Gene and parC Genes in Clinical Isolates of Acintobacter baumannii Resistant to Fluoroquinolone.

Maysaa El Sayed Zaki1, Nermen Abou ElKheir1, Mohamed Mofreh1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Acinetobacterb aumannii (A. baumannii) is an important pathogen in health care associated infections. Quinolone resistance has emerged in this pathogen. AIMS &
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to determine the presence of mutations of gyrA gene and parC genes by Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Polymerase Chain Reaction (RFLP-PCR) among clinical isolates of A. baumanii.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was carried out on 140 clinical isolates of A. baumannii. The isolates were subjected to molecular study of mutations of gyrA gene and parC genes by RFLP-PCR beside determination of Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) by macro dilution tube method.
RESULTS: The isolates of A. baumannii were resistant to ciprofloxacine and levofloxacin at MIC >4 µg/ml. The most isolates had MIC >128 µg/ml (42.3%). All resistant strains to ciprofloxacin of A. baumannii had mutations in gyrA and parC. The most frequent mutations were combined mutations in both genes (85.5%) and 5% had single mutation either in gyrA or parC. The most frequently combined mutations were associated with MIC >128 µg/ml (42.3%).
CONCLUSION: From this study we can conclude that resistance to ciprofloxacin was common in clinical isolates of A. baumannii. The most frequent mutations were present in gyrA and parC. However, mutations in parC alone were not uncommon. Further large scale studies are required to elucidate the resistance pattern of A. baumannii and its molecular mechanisms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  A. baumannii; Clinical isolates; Molecular mechanisms; Mutations; Quinolone resistance; RFLP-PCR

Year:  2018        PMID: 29785218      PMCID: PMC5958293          DOI: 10.2174/1874285801812010116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Microbiol J        ISSN: 1874-2858


INTRODUCTION

Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) has emerged in the last years as an important pathogen causing health care associated infections. It is one of the so called “ESKAPE” bacteria known to have high antibiotics resistance (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) [1]. A. baumannii is responsible for varieties of serious infections especially among patients in intensive care units such as blood stream infections, ventilator associated pneumonia, wound infections and urinary tract infections [2, 3]. A. baumannii has been associated with several antibiotics resistance not limited to Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase. There are reports concerning the development of resistance to fluoroquinolones that represents a therapeutic target for this organism [4]. Fluoroquinolones act mainly on bacterial DNA topoisomerases enzymes class II (DNA gyrase) and class I. These enzymes are important for DNA replication in bacterial species. Fluoroquinolones inhibit the action of supercoiling in the bacterial cells mediated by both enzymes and result in impaired DNA replication therefore inhibiting cell division [5, 6]. The main mechanism of resistance to fluoroquinolones is the mutations of the genes that encode the subunits of DNA gyrase (gyrA and gyrB) and topoisomerase IV (parC and parE). The mutations involve mainly the Quinolone Resistance-Determining Regions (QRDRs) of gyrA gene and its homologous region of the parC gene. On the other hand, the mutations in gyrB and parE genes regions are of minor significance [7-9]. There are few data from Egypt on fluoroquinolone resistance among isolates of A. baumanii that involves the mutations in the genes of gyrA and parC genes. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine the presence of mutations in gyrA and parC by Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Polymerase Chain Reaction (RFLP-PCR) among clinical isolates of A. baumanii.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was cross sectional prospective study that was performed in Mansoura University hospitals, Egypt from January 2016 till January 2017. The study included clinical samples from patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) with health care associated infections according to the CDC definitions. The study was approved by Mansoura faculty of Medicine ethical committee. Bacterial isolates were recovered from clinical samples according to the standard microbiological culture techniques. Biochemical identification of the A. baumanii isolates was based on Microscan automated system. Antibiotics susceptibility tests for the isolates was carried out by agar disc diffusion method.

Antibiotics Discs Susceptibility

Antibiotics susceptibility was performed by disc diffusion method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines [CLSI 2017]. The discs used for antibiotics susceptibility were ampicillin (2µg), ampicillin/sulbactam (10µg+10µg) cefepime (30µg), cefoxitin (30µg), ceftazidime (10µg), ciprofloxacin (1µg), gentamicin (30µg), imipenem (10µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), meropenem (10 µg), levofloxacin (5μg) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75μg), cefotaxime (30µg) (Oxoid).

Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) for Ciprofloxacin

Broth macrodilution method was used for the determination of MIC for ciprofloxacin among isolated A. baumanii according to the CLSI instructions. Serial dilutions of ciprofloxacin were prepared using Muller Hinton broth and bacterial isolates with concentration equal to 0.5 McFarland were added to each tube and incubated at 37OC for 18 hours. MIC was defined as the lowest concentration with no visible growth. A. baumannii isolates were considered as intermediate-resistant and full-resistant to ciprofloxacin when the MIC was 2 µg/ml and ≥4 µg/ml, respectively [10]. RFLP -PCR for Detection of Mutations in Gene’s gyrA and parC

DNA Extraction

Identified isolates of A. baumannii were subjected to DNA extraction by boiling method. Briefly colonies were dissolved in 1ml sterile distilled water and boiled for 10 minutes then centrifuged for another 10 minutes. The supernatant was preserved in sterile eppendorf at -20OC until amplification.

Amplification Procedures

Amplification procedure was performed by the use of 2 μl of the extracted DNA added to total mixture of 20 μl of amplification mixture supplied by Qiagen. The used primers were summarized in Table . The programmed cycles for amplifications were described previously by Villa et al., 1995 and Villa et al., 1999 [7, 8]. Restriction Fragment length Polymorphism for Detection of Mutations in gyrA and parC. HinfI (Promega) enzyme was used for the digestion of gyrA and parC in the amplified products of A. baumannii. The amplified products were purified by the use of QIA quick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The eluant was incubated at 37°C for 2.5 hours with 10 U of HinfI. The digests were then separated by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and photographed with UV illumination. The presence of 291 bp indicated the presence of mutation in gyrA and the presence of 52 bp indicated the presence of mutation in parC.

RESULTS

Total 140 isolates of A. baumannii were recovered from clinical isolates from ICUs during one year duration of the study. The majority of the isolates were recovered from wounds culture 60 (42.9%) followed by blood cultures 50 (35.7%) and urine cultures 30 (21.4%), (Table ). There was a high resistance of the isolated A. baumannii to antibiotics with resistance to ampicillin (100%), ampicillin/sulbactam (100%), imipenem (100%), ceftazidime (99.3%), cefipime (96.4%). Resistance to ciprofloxacin was 92.3%., (Table ). The isolates of A. baumannii with resistance to ciprofloxacine and levofloxacin had MIC >4 µg/ml. The most isolates had MIC >128 µg/ml (42.3%), (Table ). All resistant strains of A. baumannii to ciprofloxacin had mutations in gyrA and parC. The most frequent mutations were combined mutations in both genes (85.5%) and 5% had single mutation either in gyrA or parC, (Table ). The most frequent combined mutations was associated with MIC >128 µg/ml (42.3%), (Table ).

DISCUSSION

A. baumannii has emerged in last few years as an important pathogen of the health care associated infections. The principle pathogenicity of A. baumannii arises from its wide antibiotic resistance pattern making few options for its therapeutic management among which are flouroquinolone compounds [11]. In the present study A. baumannii was identified by the use of Microscan automated system. Generally, the automated system is an acceptable method for identification of this species compared with other automated and molecular systems such as Vitek 2 and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS)-based VITEK MS [12]. For antibiotics susceptibility tests antibiotics discs diffusion method was used for screening of the resistance pattern of the isolated A. baumannii species. All A. baumannii isolates were multidrug resistance according to the definition of Magiorakos & Perl 2008 [11]. Previous report supported the use of quinolone, ceftazidime and impinem as an empirical antibiotics therapy [13]. However, in the present study there was high resistance of the isolated A. baumannii to antibiotics with resistance to ampicillin (100%), ampicillin/sulbactam (100%), imipenem (100%), ceftazidime (99.3%), cefipime (96.4%). This pattern of antibiotics resistance is similar to that reported previously from Egypt on limited number of A. baumannii strains [14]. Therefore, this pattern of resistance limits the available empirical antibiotics therapy used for treating the infections caused by this pathogen. The factors associated with this resistance may be attributed to the overuse of these antibiotics as an empirical therapy with increase of antibiotics resistance through transmission of resistant genes [15]. The remaining therapeutic options are colistin (a relatively toxic drug), tigecycline (a bacteriostatic agent) that has a disadvantage when using in immunocompromised patients [16]. By disc diffusion and MIC the resistance to ciprofloxacin was 92.3%. This is similar to previous study reported in 2017 and more than another study in Egypt, (75%) [17].The resistance of isolated A. baumannii to ciprofloxacine has shown marked increase in the last few years in the developing countries with range from 95% up to 97.7% [3, 18, 19]. In the present study all isolates of A. resistant by disc diffusion method were resistant by MIC method. Similarly, Stone et al., 2007 [20] reported that disc diffusion method was a good rapid screening method to MIC for determination of antibiotics susceptibility. Resistance of A. baumannii is mediated mainly by mutation in gyrA and parC genes [4, 15, 21, 22]. In the preset study, all resistant A. baumanii isolates to ciprofloxacin had mutations of gyrA gene and/or parC by PCR-RFLP analysis described by previous studies [7, 8]. This method detects the presence of gyrA and parC mutations at codon 83 and codon 80 with substitution of serine with leucine in gyrA and serine with leucine in parC. The isolates of A. baumanii with MIC to ciprofloxacin more than 128 μg/mL had combined mutations in the gyrA and parC. These findings indicate that combined mutations are associated with high MIC resistance to ciprofloxacin. The combined mutations in these genes are associated with marked decrease in the binding affinity for quinolones in the resistant species [23-27]. The results of our study and the previous study from Egypt [4] suggested that these mutations are common in ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolates of A. baumannii and similar findings were reported in previous studies [7, 8, 12, 22, 28]. The study of mechanisms implicated in resistance of A. baumannii to ciprofloxacin should be clarified in different local epidemiological situations. Though combined mutations of parC and gyrA are reported to be associated with a high-level of resistance to quinolones [8], four clinical isolates in our study had mutations in parC without mutations in gyrA, suggesting that parC may had a primary role in developing resistance to ciprofloxacin without mutation in gyrA. Similar findings were reported by Ardebili et al., 2015 [29]. All the isolates of the A. baumanii resistant to ciprofloxacine were associated with mutations in gyrA and parC. However, other mechanisms can be associated with this resistance such as changes in the efflux systems [30]. Further studies with large number of isolates are required to clarify the mechanisms associated with resistance of A. baumanii.

CONCLUSION

From this study we can conclude that resistance to ciprofloxacin is common in clinical isolates of A. baumannii. The most frequent mutations were those present in gyrA and parC genes. However, mutation in parC alone was not uncommon. Further, large scale studies are required to elucidate the resistance pattern of A. baumannii and its molecular mechanisms.
Table 1

Primers sequences of the target genes.

Target GenePrimer sequence (5'-3')Amplicon size
gyrAForwardAATCTGCCCGTGTCGTTGGT343 bp
ReverseGCCATACCTACGGCGATACC
parCForwardAAACCTGTTCAGCGCCGCATT327 bp
ReverseAAAGTTGTCTTGCCATTCACT
Table 2

Distribution of A. baumannii isolates from clinical samples.

Sample No.%
Blood Culture6042.9
Wounds Culture5037.5
Urine Culture3021.4
Total140100%
Table 3

Antibiotics Resistance among isolates of A. baumannii.

Antibiotics No.%
Ampicillin140100
Ampicillin/sulbactam140100
cefepime13596.4
cefoxitin13495.7
ceftazidime13999.3
ciprofloxacin13092.9
gentamicin10071.4
imipenem140100
ceftriaxone13092.9
meropenem140100
levofloxacin13092.9
trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole12488.6
cefotaxime12891.4
Table 4

A. baumannii resistance by MIC.

MIC µg/ml
4No. %8No. %16No. %32No. %64No. %128No. %>128No. %
gyrA35 26.9%30 23.1%2 1.5%3 2.3%2 1.5%3 2.3%55 42.3%
Table 5

Genetic mutations among A. baumannii isolates.

Characteristics N0.%
gyrA53.6%
parC53.6%
Combined gyrA and parC12085.7%
Total140100%
Table 6

Distribution of gyrA and parC mutations among resistant A. baumannii in relation to MIC.

Characteristics MIC µg/ml
4No. %8N0. %16N0. %32No. %64No. %128N0. %>128N0. %
gyrA0 0%0 0%0 0%3 2.3%2 1.5%0 0%0 0%
parC0 0%0 0%2 1.5%0 0%0 0%3 23%0 0%
Combined gyrA and parC35 26.9%30 23.1%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%55 42.3%
  27 in total

Review 1.  DNA topoisomerases: structure, function, and mechanism.

Authors:  J J Champoux
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  Mutations in the gyrA and parC genes in ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii in Korea.

Authors:  Jeom Kyu Lee; Yeong Seon Lee; Yong Keun Park; Bong Su Kim
Journal:  Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.955

3.  Comparison of disk diffusion, VITEK 2, and broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility test results for unusual species of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Nimalie D Stone; Caroline M O'Hara; Portia P Williams; John E McGowan; Fred C Tenover
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Interaction between DNA gyrase and quinolones: effects of alanine mutations at GyrA subunit residues Ser(83) and Asp(87).

Authors:  F M Barnard; A Maxwell
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Genetic diversity of carbapenem-resistant isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii in Europe.

Authors:  K J Towner; K Levi; M Vlassiadi
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 8.067

6.  Mutations in gyrA and parC genes in nalidixic acid-resistant Escherichia coli strains from food products, humans and animals.

Authors:  Yolanda Sáenz; Myriam Zarazaga; Laura Briñas; Fernanda Ruiz-Larrea; Carmen Torres
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2003-03-13       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 7.  Fluoroquinolone resistance: mechanisms, impact on bacteria, and role in evolutionary success.

Authors:  Liam S Redgrave; Sam B Sutton; Mark A Webber; Laura J V Piddock
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 17.079

8.  Evaluation of Ciprofloxacin (gyrA, parC Genes) and Tetracycline (tetB Gene) Resistance in Nosocomial Acinetobacter baumannii Infections.

Authors:  Jamileh Nowroozi; Abbas Akhavan Sepahi; Lida Tahmasebinejad Kamarposhti; Roya Razavipour; Flor Mazhar
Journal:  Jundishapur J Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 0.747

9.  Correlation of ciprofloxacin resistance with the AdeABC efflux system in Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates.

Authors:  Abdollah Ardebili; Abdolaziz Rastegar Lari; Malihe Talebi
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.464

10.  Co-existence of blaOXA-23 and blaNDM-1 genes of Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from Nepal: antimicrobial resistance and clinical significance.

Authors:  Prabhu Raj Joshi; Mahesh Acharya; Trishna Kakshapati; Udomluk Leungtongkam; Rapee Thummeepak; Sutthirat Sitthisak
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.887

View more
  3 in total

1.  Plasmid-Mediated Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Geetha P Venkataramana; Aishwarya K V Lalitha; Shanthi Mariappan; Uma Sekar
Journal:  J Lab Physicians       Date:  2022-02-09

2.  Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii outbreaks: a global problem in healthcare settings.

Authors:  Mariana Neri Lucas Kurihara; Romário Oliveira de Sales; Késia Esther da Silva; Wirlaine Glauce Maciel; Simone Simionatto
Journal:  Rev Soc Bras Med Trop       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 1.581

Review 3.  Acinetobacter baumannii Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms.

Authors:  Ioannis Kyriakidis; Eleni Vasileiou; Zoi Dorothea Pana; Athanasios Tragiannidis
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-03-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.