Smruti K Patel1, Yair M Gozal2, Bryan M Krueger3, James C Bayley4, Suzanne Moody5, Norberto Andaluz6, Richard A Falcone7, Karin S Bierbrauer8. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH. Electronic address: smruti.patel@uc.edu. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH. Electronic address: ymgozal@gmail.com. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH. Electronic address: bryan.krueger@my.rfums.org. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH. Electronic address: james.c.bayley@gmail.com. 5. Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH; Comprehensive Children's Injury Center, Cincinnati, OH. Electronic address: Suzanne.moody@cchmc.org. 6. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH; Mayfield Brain & Spine, Cincinnati, OH. Electronic address: andalun@ucmail.uc.edu. 7. Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH; Comprehensive Children's Injury Center, Cincinnati, OH. Electronic address: Richard.falcone@cchmc.org. 8. Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH; Comprehensive Children's Injury Center, Cincinnati, OH. Electronic address: Karin.bierbrauer@cchmc.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) comprises the majority of pediatric traumatic brain injury. Children with mTBI even with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH) rarely experience a clinically significant neurologic decline (CSND). The utility of routine surveillance imaging in the pediatric population also remains controversial, especially owing to concerns about the risks of radiation exposure at a young age. This study aims to identify demographic or injury-related characteristics that may facilitate recognition of children at risk of progression with mTBI. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients <16 years old with mTBI (GCS 13-15) and tICH admitted to a Level I pediatric trauma center between 2009 and 2014. Management of these patients was directed by the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Minor Head Injury Algorithm. We reviewed each chart with emphasis on patient demographics, injury specific data, and radiographic or clinical progression. RESULTS: 154 patients met inclusion criteria with mean age of 4 [0-16]; 116 sustained an tICH and 38 patients had isolated skull fractures. Repeat neuroimaging was obtained in 68 patients (59%). Only 9 patients (13%) with tICH had radiographic progression, none of which resulted in CSND. In addition, 9 patients experienced CSND, leading to neurosurgical intervention in 6 patients. Notably, none of these patients had repeat imaging prior to their neurologic changes. Both CSND and need for intervention were significantly higher in patients with epidural hematomas than other types of tICH (19.2% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.002). Of 154 patients, 19 did not have documented follow-up, 135 were seen as outpatients and 65 (48%) had follow up neuroimaging. All patients who had surveillance imaging in the outpatient setting had stable or resolved tICH. CONCLUSION: Few children with mTBI and tICH experience clinical decline. Importantly, all patients that required neurosurgical intervention were identified by clinical changes rather than via repeat imaging. Our study suggests that in the vast majority of cases, clinical monitoring alone is safe and sufficient in patients in order to avoid exposure to repeat radiographic imaging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic and epidemiological. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) comprises the majority of pediatric traumatic brain injury. Children with mTBI even with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH) rarely experience a clinically significant neurologic decline (CSND). The utility of routine surveillance imaging in the pediatric population also remains controversial, especially owing to concerns about the risks of radiation exposure at a young age. This study aims to identify demographic or injury-related characteristics that may facilitate recognition of children at risk of progression with mTBI. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients <16 years old with mTBI (GCS 13-15) and tICH admitted to a Level I pediatric trauma center between 2009 and 2014. Management of these patients was directed by the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Minor Head Injury Algorithm. We reviewed each chart with emphasis on patient demographics, injury specific data, and radiographic or clinical progression. RESULTS: 154 patients met inclusion criteria with mean age of 4 [0-16]; 116 sustained an tICH and 38 patients had isolated skull fractures. Repeat neuroimaging was obtained in 68 patients (59%). Only 9 patients (13%) with tICH had radiographic progression, none of which resulted in CSND. In addition, 9 patients experienced CSND, leading to neurosurgical intervention in 6 patients. Notably, none of these patients had repeat imaging prior to their neurologic changes. Both CSND and need for intervention were significantly higher in patients with epidural hematomas than other types of tICH (19.2% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.002). Of 154 patients, 19 did not have documented follow-up, 135 were seen as outpatients and 65 (48%) had follow up neuroimaging. All patients who had surveillance imaging in the outpatient setting had stable or resolved tICH. CONCLUSION: Few children with mTBI and tICH experience clinical decline. Importantly, all patients that required neurosurgical intervention were identified by clinical changes rather than via repeat imaging. Our study suggests that in the vast majority of cases, clinical monitoring alone is safe and sufficient in patients in order to avoid exposure to repeat radiographic imaging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic and epidemiological. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: D Clay Samples; Michael T Bounajem; David J Wallace; Lillian Liao; Izabela Tarasiewicz Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2019-06-08 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Jacob K Greenberg; Donna B Jeffe; Christopher R Carpenter; Yan Yan; Jose A Pineda; Angela Lumba-Brown; Martin S Keller; Daniel Berger; Robert J Bollo; Vijay M Ravindra; Robert P Naftel; Michael C Dewan; Manish N Shah; Erin C Burns; Brent R O'Neill; Todd C Hankinson; William E Whitehead; P David Adelson; Mandeep S Tamber; Patrick J McDonald; Edward S Ahn; William Titsworth; Alina N West; Ross C Brownson; David D Limbrick Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2018-10-26 Impact factor: 2.375