Literature DB >> 30485194

North American survey on the post-neuroimaging management of children with mild head injuries.

Jacob K Greenberg1, Donna B Jeffe2, Christopher R Carpenter3, Yan Yan4, Jose A Pineda5,6, Angela Lumba-Brown7, Martin S Keller4, Daniel Berger1, Robert J Bollo8, Vijay M Ravindra8, Robert P Naftel9, Michael C Dewan9, Manish N Shah10, Erin C Burns11, Brent R O'Neill12, Todd C Hankinson12, William E Whitehead13, P David Adelson14, Mandeep S Tamber15, Patrick J McDonald16, Edward S Ahn17, William Titsworth17, Alina N West18, Ross C Brownson4,19,20, David D Limbrick1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVEThere remains uncertainty regarding the appropriate level of care and need for repeating neuroimaging among children with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) complicated by intracranial injury (ICI). This study's objective was to investigate physician practice patterns and decision-making processes for these patients in order to identify knowledge gaps and highlight avenues for future investigation.METHODSThe authors surveyed residents, fellows, and attending physicians from the following pediatric specialties: emergency medicine; general surgery; neurosurgery; and critical care. Participants came from 10 institutions in the United States and an email list maintained by the Canadian Neurosurgical Society. The survey asked respondents to indicate management preferences for and experiences with children with mTBI complicated by ICI, focusing on an exemplar clinical vignette of a 7-year-old girl with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15 and a 5-mm subdural hematoma without midline shift after a fall down stairs.RESULTSThe response rate was 52% (n = 536). Overall, 326 (61%) respondents indicated they would recommend ICU admission for the child in the vignette. However, only 62 (12%) agreed/strongly agreed that this child was at high risk of neurological decline. Half of respondents (45%; n = 243) indicated they would order a planned follow-up CT (29%; n = 155) or MRI scan (19%; n = 102), though only 64 (12%) agreed/strongly agreed that repeat neuroimaging would influence their management. Common factors that increased the likelihood of ICU admission included presence of a focal neurological deficit (95%; n = 508 endorsed), midline shift (90%; n = 480) or an epidural hematoma (88%; n = 471). However, 42% (n = 225) indicated they would admit all children with mTBI and ICI to the ICU. Notably, 27% (n = 143) of respondents indicated they had seen one or more children with mTBI and intracranial hemorrhage demonstrate a rapid neurological decline when admitted to a general ward in the last year, and 13% (n = 71) had witnessed this outcome at least twice in the past year.CONCLUSIONSMany physicians endorse ICU admission and repeat neuroimaging for pediatric mTBI with ICI, despite uncertainty regarding the clinical utility of those decisions. These results, combined with evidence that existing practice may provide insufficient monitoring to some high-risk children, emphasize the need for validated decision tools to aid the management of these patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ED = emergency department; GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale; ICI = intracranial injury; ICU = intensive care unit; OR = odds ratio; TBI = traumatic brain injury; clinical decision making; health services research; intracranial injury; mTBI = mild TBI; survey research; trauma; traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30485194      PMCID: PMC6717430          DOI: 10.3171/2018.7.PEDS18263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr        ISSN: 1933-0707            Impact factor:   2.375


  38 in total

Review 1.  From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care.

Authors:  Richard Grol; Jeremy Grimshaw
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-10-11       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods.

Authors:  Debbie Collins
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research.

Authors:  Kate Kelley; Belinda Clark; Vivienne Brown; John Sitzia
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.038

4.  Response rates and nonresponse errors in surveys.

Authors:  Timothy P Johnson; Joseph S Wislar
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Development and Internal Validation of a Clinical Risk Score for Treating Children With Mild Head Trauma and Intracranial Injury.

Authors:  Jacob K Greenberg; Yan Yan; Christopher R Carpenter; Angela Lumba-Brown; Martin S Keller; Jose A Pineda; Ross C Brownson; David D Limbrick
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 16.193

6.  Shunt-dependent hydrocephalus: management style among members of the American Society of Pediatric Neurosurgeons.

Authors:  Mark R Kraemer; Carolina Sandoval-Garcia; Taryn Bragg; Bermans J Iskandar
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Derivation of the children's head injury algorithm for the prediction of important clinical events decision rule for head injury in children.

Authors:  J Dunning; J Patrick Daly; J-P Lomas; F Lecky; J Batchelor; K Mackway-Jones
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Reimaging in pediatric neurotrauma: factors associated with progression of intracranial injury.

Authors:  Andy Givner; Jennifer Gurney; Daniel O'Connor; Ara Kassarjian; Wayne W Lamorte; Steve Moulton
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Relative productivity of nurse practitioner and resident physician care models in the pediatric emergency department.

Authors:  William M McDonnell; Pamela Carpenter; Kammy Jacobsen; Howard A Kadish
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.454

10.  Management of children with mild traumatic brain injury and intracranial hemorrhage.

Authors:  Jacob K Greenberg; Ivan T Stoev; Tae Sung Park; Matthew D Smyth; Jeffrey R Leonard; Julie C Leonard; Jose A Pineda; David D Limbrick
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.313

View more
  4 in total

1.  Usability and Acceptability of Clinical Decision Support Based on the KIIDS-TBI Tool for Children with Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries and Intracranial Injuries.

Authors:  Jacob K Greenberg; Ayodamola Otun; Pyi Theim Kyaw; Christopher R Carpenter; Ross C Brownson; Nathan Kuppermann; David D Limbrick; Randi E Foraker; Po-Yin Yen
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Measures of Intracranial Injury Size Do Not Improve Clinical Decision Making for Children With Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries and Intracranial Injuries.

Authors:  Jacob K Greenberg; Margaret A Olsen; Gabrielle W Johnson; Ranbir Ahluwalia; Madelyn Hill; Andrew T Hale; Ahmed Belal; Shawyon Baygani; Randi E Foraker; Christopher R Carpenter; Laurie L Ackerman; Corina Noje; Eric M Jackson; Erin Burns; Christina M Sayama; Nathan R Selden; Shobhan Vachhrajani; Chevis N Shannon; Nathan Kuppermann; David D Limbrick
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Trends and variation in repeat neuroimaging for children with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.

Authors:  Pradip P Chaudhari; Jose A Pineda; Richard G Bachur; Robinder G Khemani
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2021-03-06

4.  Electronic clinical decision support for children with minor head trauma and intracranial injuries: a sociotechnical analysis.

Authors:  Po-Yin Yen; Randi E Foraker; Jacob K Greenberg; Ayodamola Otun; Azzah Nasraddin; Ross C Brownson; Nathan Kuppermann; David D Limbrick
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 2.796

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.