| Literature DB >> 29783681 |
Wan Khartini Wan Abdul Khodir1, Abdul Hakim Abdul Razak2, Min Hwei Ng3, Vincenzo Guarino4, Deny Susanti5.
Abstract
In the current practice, the clinical use of conventional skin substitutes such as autogenous skin grafts have shown several problems, mainly with respect to limited sources and donor site morbidity. In order to overcome these limitations, the use of smart synthetic biomaterials is tremendously diffusing as skin substitutes. Indeed, engineered skin grafts or analogues frequently play an important role in the treatment of chronic skin wounds, by supporting the regeneration of newly formed tissue, and at the same time preventing infections during the long-term treatment. In this context, natural proteins such as collagen-natively present in the skin tissue-embedded in synthetic polymers (i.e., PCL) allow the development of micro-structured matrices able to mimic the functions and to structure of the surrounding extracellular matrix. Moreover, the encapsulation of drugs, such as gentamicin sulfate, also improves the bioactivity of nanofibers, due to the efficient loading and a controlled drug release towards the site of interest. Herein, we have done a preliminary investigation on the capability of gentamicin sulfate, loaded into collagen-added nanofibers, for the controlled release in local infection treatments. Experimental studies have demonstrated that collagen added fibers can be efficaciously used to administrate gentamicin for 72 h without any toxic in vitro response, thus emerging as a valid candidate for the therapeutic treatment of infected wounds.Entities:
Keywords: collagen; controlled release; gentamicin; nanofibers; skin regeneration
Year: 2018 PMID: 29783681 PMCID: PMC6023495 DOI: 10.3390/jfb9020036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Funct Biomater ISSN: 2079-4983
Figure 1Illustration scheme of electrospun collagen/PCL loaded gentamicin sulfate at 12 kV and flow rate, 0.6 mL/h.
Figure 2SEM images and fiber diameter distribution of (a) CP and (b) GCP electrospun fibers.
Figure 3Fiber diameter distribution of (a) CP and (b) GCP electrospun fibers.
Figure 4Release profile of GCP electrospun fibers.
Figure 5Cytotoxicity test by MTT assay on HDF cell culture onto PCL, CP, GCP nanofibers and K (culture plate) at day 1, 3, and 5.