Literature DB >> 27556774

Current Concepts in Tissue Engineering: Skin and Wound.

Mayer Tenenhaus1, Hans-Oliver Rennekampff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pure regenerative healing with little to no donor morbidity remains an elusive goal for both surgeon and patient. The ability to engineer and promote the development of like tissue holds so much promise, and efforts in this direction are slowly but steadily advancing.
METHODS: Products selected and reviewed reflect historical precedence and importance and focus on current clinically available products in use. Emerging technologies we anticipate will further expand our therapeutic options are introduced. The topic of tissue engineering is incredibly broad in scope, and as such the authors have focused their review on that of constructs specifically designed for skin and wound healing. A review of pertinent and current clinically related literature is included.
RESULTS: Products such as biosynthetics, biologics, cellular promoting factors, and commercially available matrices can be routinely found in most modern health care centers. Although to date no complete regenerative or direct identical soft-tissue replacement exists, currently available commercial components have proven beneficial in augmenting and improving some types of wound healing scenarios. Cost, directed specificity, biocompatibility, and bioburden tolerance are just some of the impending challenges to adoption.
CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life and in fact the ability to sustain life is dependent on our most complex and remarkable organ, skin. Although pure regenerative healing and engineered soft-tissue constructs elude us, surgeons and health care providers are slowly gaining comfort and experience with concepts and strategies to improve the healing of wounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27556774     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  8 in total

1.  Bioinspired multilayer membranes as potential adhesive patches for skin wound healing.

Authors:  Maria P Sousa; Ana I Neto; Tiago R Correia; Sónia P Miguel; Michiya Matsusaki; Ilídio J Correia; João F Mano
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 6.843

Review 2.  Minimizing Skin Scarring through Biomaterial Design.

Authors:  Alessandra L Moore; Clement D Marshall; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2017-01-21

3.  Encapsulation and Characterization of Gentamicin Sulfate in the Collagen Added Electrospun Nanofibers for Skin Regeneration.

Authors:  Wan Khartini Wan Abdul Khodir; Abdul Hakim Abdul Razak; Min Hwei Ng; Vincenzo Guarino; Deny Susanti
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2018-05-18

4.  The Feasibility of Using Pulsatile Electromagnetic Fields (PEMFs) to Enhance the Regenerative Ability of Dermal Biomaterial Scaffolds.

Authors:  Dale S Feldman
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2018-11-19

Review 5.  Biomaterial Enhanced Regeneration Design Research for Skin and Load Bearing Applications.

Authors:  Dale S Feldman
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2019-01-26

6.  Prevascularization of dermal substitutes with adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments enhances early skin grafting.

Authors:  Florian S Frueh; Thomas Später; Christina Körbel; Claudia Scheuer; Anna C Simson; Nicole Lindenblatt; Pietro Giovanoli; Michael D Menger; Matthias W Laschke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Transforming Growth Factor-β₃ (TGF-β₃) to Enhance the Regenerative Ability of an Albumin Scaffold in Full Thickness Wound Healing.

Authors:  Dale S Feldman; John F McCauley
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2018-11-14

8.  Adoption of a Newly Introduced Dermal Matrix: Preliminary Experience and Future Directions.

Authors:  Andrea Vittorio Emanuele Lisa; Leonardo Galtelli; Valeriano Vinci; Alessandra Veronesi; Luca Cozzaglio; Ferdinando Carlo Maria Cananzi; Federico Sicoli; Marco Klinger
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.