Literature DB >> 29781183

A Comparison of 1- and 3.2-MHz Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound on Osteogenesis on Porous Titanium Alloy Scaffolds: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study.

Lifang Feng1, Xiaohan Liu1, Hongjuan Cao1, Limei Qin1, Wentao Hou2, Lin Wu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) combined with porous scaffolds can be used as a new therapy to treat bone defect repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 1 and 3.2 MHz LIPUS on osteogenesis on porous Ti64 alloy scaffolds for both in vitro and in vivo studies.
METHODS: Scaffolds were randomly divided into the high-frequency ultrasound group, low-frequency ultrasound group, and control group. Mouse pre-osteoblast cells were cultured with porous Ti-6Al-4V scaffolds in vitro to evaluate cell proliferation and differentiation. In addition, scaffolds were implanted into rabbit mandibular defects in vivo. The effects of LIPUS on bone regeneration were evaluated by observing the micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), toluidine blue staining, and von Kossa staining.
RESULTS: The results revealed no significant difference in the cell counting kit-8 values between the ultrasound groups and control groups (P > .05). Compared with the control group, ultrasound promoted alkaline phosphatase activity and osteocalcin levels of the cells on the scaffolds (P < .05), but there was no significant difference between the two frequencies. In addition, histomorphologic analyses revealed that the volume and amount of new bone formation increased and that bone maturity improved in the ultrasound groups compared with the control group, but no significant difference was noted between the two frequencies.
CONCLUSIONS: Under the present experimental conditions, LIPUS promoted osteoblast differentiation and promoted bone maturity on porous Ti64 scaffolds. No significant differences were noted between the two frequencies.
© 2018 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone formation; frequency; low-intensity pulsed ultrasound; osteogenesis; porous Ti64 scaffolds

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29781183     DOI: 10.1002/jum.14683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  4 in total

1.  Nanovibrational stimulation inhibits osteoclastogenesis and enhances osteogenesis in co-cultures.

Authors:  John W Kennedy; P Monica Tsimbouri; Paul Campsie; Shatakshi Sood; Peter G Childs; Stuart Reid; Peter S Young; Dominic R M Meek; Carl S Goodyear; Matthew J Dalby
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  A Tissue Engineering Acoustophoretic (TEA) Set-up for the Enhanced Osteogenic Differentiation of Murine Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (mMSCs).

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Nirina Beilfuss; Urszula Zabarylo; Kay Raum; Regina Puts
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  Effects of collimated and focused low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation on the mandible repair in rabbits.

Authors:  Xiaohan Liu; Ying Hu; Lin Wu; Shujun Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02

Review 4.  Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Colleen McCarthy; Gulden Camci-Unal
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.891

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.