Literature DB >> 29781117

PSA screening, prostate biopsy, and treatment of prostate cancer in the years surrounding the USPSTF recommendation against prostate cancer screening.

James T Kearns1, Sarah K Holt1, Jonathan L Wright1, Daniel W Lin1, Paul H Lange1, John L Gore1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendation against screening for prostate cancer has impacted rates of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening and appears to be associated with declining prostate cancer incidence. Our objective was to characterize health care utilization that may explain these observed trends.
METHODS: MarketScan claims, which capture >30 million privately insured patients in the United States, were queried for all men aged 40-64 years for the years 2008-2014. PSA testing, prostate biopsy, prostate cancer diagnosis, and definitive local treatment were determined using associated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Current Procedural Terminology, Fourth Edition codes.
RESULTS: There were approximately 6 million qualifying men with a full year of data. PSA testing, prostate biopsy, and prostate cancer detection declined significantly between 2009 and 2014, most notably after 2011. The prostate biopsy rate per 100 patients with a PSA test decreased over the study period from 1.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.92-1.97) to 1.52 (95% CI, 1.50-1.54). Prostate cancer incidence per prostate biopsy increased over the study period from 0.36 (95% CI, 0.35-0.36) to 0.39 (95% CI, 0.39-0.40). Of new prostate cancer diagnoses, the proportion managed with definitive local treatment decreased from 69% (95% CI, 69%-70%) to 54% (95% CI, 53%-55%). Both PSA testing and prostate cancer incidence decreased significantly after 2011 (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: In a large cohort of privately insured men, PSA testing, prostate biopsy, prostate cancer incidence, and local definitive treatment for prostate cancer decreased between 2008 and 2014, most notably after 2011. This decrease may be driven by differential referral patterns from primary care providers to urologists. Cancer 2018;124:2733-2739.
© 2018 American Cancer Society. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  prostate biopsy; prostate-specific antigen; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms; screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29781117     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  18 in total

1.  Prostate Cancer Incidence 5 Years After US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations Against Screening.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; MaryBeth B Culp; Jiemin Ma; Farhad Islami; Stacey A Fedewa
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Contemporary treatments in prostate cancer focal therapy.

Authors:  Michael Ahdoot; Amir H Lebastchi; Baris Turkbey; Bradford Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.645

3.  Trends in Urethral Suspension With Robotic Prostatectomy Procedures Following Medicare Payment Policy Changes.

Authors:  Jonathan Li; Dattatraya Patil; Benjamin J Davies; Christopher P Filson
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-10-03

4.  Changes in prostate cancer survival among insured patients in relation to USPSTF screening recommendations.

Authors:  Isaac E Kim; Daniel D Kim; Sinae Kim; Shuangge Ma; Thomas L Jang; Eric A Singer; Saum Ghodoussipour; Isaac Yi Kim
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 2.090

5.  Comparison of Three Assays for Total and Free PSA Using Hybritech and WHO Calibrations.

Authors:  Manuel M Garrido; José C Marta; Ruy M Ribeiro; Luís C Pinheiro; Stefan Holdenrieder; João T Guimarães
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Geographic-Level Association of Contemporary Changes in Localized and Metastatic Prostate Cancer Incidence in the Era of Decreasing PSA Screening.

Authors:  Daniel X Yang; Danil V Makarov; Cary P Gross; James B Yu
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

7.  Evaluation of the Use of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Pathologist Assessment to Review and Grade Prostate Biopsies.

Authors:  David F Steiner; Kunal Nagpal; Rory Sayres; Davis J Foote; Benjamin D Wedin; Adam Pearce; Carrie J Cai; Samantha R Winter; Matthew Symonds; Liron Yatziv; Andrei Kapishnikov; Trissia Brown; Isabelle Flament-Auvigne; Fraser Tan; Martin C Stumpe; Pan-Pan Jiang; Yun Liu; Po-Hsuan Cameron Chen; Greg S Corrado; Michael Terry; Craig H Mermel
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-11-02

8.  Racial and Ethnic Variation in PSA Testing and Prostate Cancer Incidence Following the 2012 USPSTF Recommendation.

Authors:  Kevin H Kensler; Claire H Pernar; Brandon A Mahal; Paul L Nguyen; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Adam S Kibel; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  Contemporary outcomes following robotic prostatectomy for locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Barrett Z McCormick; Lisly Chery; Brian F Chapin
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-05

10.  Use of the prostate-specific antigen test in the U.S. for men age 30 to 64 in 2011 to 2017 using a large commercial claims database: Implications for practice interventions.

Authors:  Shahram Shahangian; Krishna P Sharma; Lin Fan; David A Siegel
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-05-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.