Literature DB >> 33146392

Racial and Ethnic Variation in PSA Testing and Prostate Cancer Incidence Following the 2012 USPSTF Recommendation.

Kevin H Kensler1,2, Claire H Pernar2, Brandon A Mahal1,3, Paul L Nguyen3, Quoc-Dien Trinh4, Adam S Kibel4, Timothy R Rebbeck1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation against routine prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing led to a decrease in prostate cancer screening, but the heterogeneity of its impact by race and ethnicity remains unclear.
METHODS: The proportion of 40- to 74-year-old men who self-reported receiving a routine PSA test in the past year was estimated in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2012-2018). Odds ratios (ORs) of undergoing screening by race and ethnicity were estimated, adjusting for healthcare-related factors. Prostate cancer incidence rates and rate ratios (IRRs) by race and ethnicity were estimated using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry data (2004-2017).
RESULTS: PSA testing frequencies were 32.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 31.7% to 32.8%) among non-Hispanic White (NHW), 30.3% (95% CI = 28.3% to 32.3%) among non-Hispanic Black (NHB), 21.8% (95% CI = 19.9% to 23.7%) among Hispanic, and 17.7% (95% CI = 14.1% to 21.3%) among Asian and Pacific Islander men in 2012. The absolute screening frequency declined by 9.5% from 2012 to 2018, with a larger decline among NHB (11.6%) than NHW men (9.3%). The relative annual decrease was greater among NHB (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.88) than NHW men (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.89 to 0.90; Pheterogeneity = .005), driven by a larger decline among NHB men ages 40-54 years. The NHB to NHW IRR for total prostate cancer increased from 1.73 (95% CI = 1.69 to 1.76) in 2011 to 1.87 (95% CI = 1.83 to 1.92) in 2012 and has remained elevated, driven by differences in localized tumor incidence. Metastatic disease incidence is rising across all racial and ethnic groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of prostate cancer screening varies by race and ethnicity, and there was a modestly steeper decline in PSA testing among younger NHB men relative to NHW men since 2012. The NHB to NHW IRR for localized prostate cancer modestly increased following 2012.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33146392      PMCID: PMC8168268          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaa171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  35 in total

1.  Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates.

Authors:  H J Kim; M P Fay; E J Feuer; D N Midthune
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Screening for prostate cancer: recommendation and rationale.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-12-03       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening After 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations.

Authors:  Jesse D Sammon; Firas Abdollah; Toni K Choueiri; Philip W Kantoff; Paul L Nguyen; Mani Menon; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  National Prostate Cancer Screening Rates After the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Discouraging Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening.

Authors:  Michael W Drazer; Dezheng Huo; Scott E Eggener
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Prostate Cancer Incidence 5 Years After US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations Against Screening.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; MaryBeth B Culp; Jiemin Ma; Farhad Islami; Stacey A Fedewa
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Gerald L Andriole; E David Crawford; Robert L Grubb; Saundra S Buys; David Chia; Timothy R Church; Mona N Fouad; Edward P Gelmann; Paul A Kvale; Douglas J Reding; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Barbara O'Brien; Jonathan D Clapp; Joshua M Rathmell; Thomas L Riley; Richard B Hayes; Barnett S Kramer; Grant Izmirlian; Anthony B Miller; Paul F Pinsky; Philip C Prorok; John K Gohagan; Christine D Berg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Health disparities in clinical practice patterns for prostate cancer screening by geographic regions in the United States: a multilevel modeling analysis.

Authors:  V Garg; D W Raisch; J P Selig; T A Thompson
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 5.554

8.  Do racial disparities exist in the use of prostate cancer screening and detection tools in veterans?

Authors:  M'Liss A Hudson; Suhong Luo; Timothy Chrusciel; Yan Yan; Robert L Grubb; Kenneth Carson; Jeffrey F Scherrer
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.498

9.  State-by-state Variation in Prostate-specific Antigen Screening Trends Following the 2011 United States Preventive Services Task Force Panel Update.

Authors:  Malte W Vetterlein; Deepansh Dalela; Jesse D Sammon; Patrick Karabon; Akshay Sood; Tarun Jindal; Christian P Meyer; Björn Löppenberg; Maxine Sun; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Mani Menon; Firas Abdollah
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Trends in Prostate Cancer Incidence Rates and Prevalence of Prostate Specific Antigen Screening by Socioeconomic Status and Regions in the United States, 2004 to 2013.

Authors:  Keisha A Houston; Jessica King; Jun Li; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  11 in total

1.  Harm-to-Benefit of Three Decades of Prostate Cancer Screening in Black Men.

Authors:  Spyridon P Basourakos; Roman Gulati; Randy A Vince; Daniel E Spratt; Patrick J Lewicki; Alexander Hill; Yaw A Nyame; Jennifer Cullen; Sarah C Markt; Christopher E Barbieri; Jim C Hu; Erika Trapl; Jonathan E Shoag
Journal:  NEJM Evid       Date:  2022-05-15

2.  The Latest Data Specifically Focused on Long-Term Oncologic Prognostication for Very Old Adults with Acute Vulnerable Localized Prostate Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Authors:  Szu-Yuan Wu; Fransisca Fortunata Effendi; Ricardo E Canales; Chung-Chien Huang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Association of the USPSTF Grade D Recommendation Against Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening With Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality.

Authors:  Laura Burgess; Christopher M Aldrighetti; Anushka Ghosh; Andrzej Niemierko; Fumiko Chino; Melissa J Huynh; Jason A Efstathiou; Sophia C Kamran
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-05-02

Review 4.  Routine Screening for Transgender and Gender Diverse Adults Taking Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Sean J Iwamoto; Frances Grimstad; Michael S Irwig; Micol S Rothman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Prostate Cancer Screening Guidelines for Black Men: Spotlight on an Empty Stage.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Yaw A Nyame
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Racial disparities in prostate cancer among black men: epidemiology and outcomes.

Authors:  Daniel J George; Lorelei A Mucci; Ilkania M Chowdhury-Paulino; Caroline Ericsson; Randy Vince; Daniel E Spratt
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 5.455

7.  Highly portable quantitative screening test for prostate-specific antigen at point of care.

Authors:  Balaji Srinivasan; David M Nanus; David Erickson; Saurabh Mehta
Journal:  Curr Res Biotechnol       Date:  2021-11-14

8.  Preferences for More or Less Health Care and Association With Health Literacy of Men Eligible for Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in Australia.

Authors:  Kristen Pickles; Laura D Scherer; Erin Cvejic; Jolyn Hersch; Alexandra Barratt; Kirsten J McCaffery
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-10-01

9.  Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality: Global Status and Temporal Trends in 89 Countries From 2000 to 2019.

Authors:  Le Wang; Bin Lu; Mengjie He; Youqing Wang; Zongping Wang; Lingbin Du
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-02-16

10.  Nanomaterial-based biosensor developing as a route toward in vitro diagnosis of early ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Yuqi Yang; Qiong Huang; Zuoxiu Xiao; Min Liu; Yan Zhu; Qiaohui Chen; Yumei Li; Kelong Ai
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2022-02-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.