Literature DB >> 29781100

Factors associated with breast MRI use among women with a family history of breast cancer.

Mary C White1, Ashwini Soman2, Clarice R Weinberg3, Juan L Rodriguez1, Susan A Sabatino1, Lucy A Peipins1, Lisa DeRoo4, Hazel B Nichols5, M Elizabeth Hodgson6, Dale P Sandler7.   

Abstract

Although annual breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended for women at high risk for breast cancer as an adjunct to screening mammography, breast MRI use remains low. We examined factors associated with breast MRI use in a cohort of women with a family history of breast cancer but no personal cancer history. Study participants came from the Sister Study cohort, a nationwide, prospective study of women with at least 1 sister who had been diagnosed with breast cancer but who themselves had not ever had breast cancer (n = 17 894). Participants were surveyed on breast cancer beliefs, cancer worry, breast MRI use, provider communication, and genetic counseling and testing. Logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with having a breast MRI overall and for those at high risk. Breast MRI was reported by 16.1% and was more common among younger women and those with higher incomes. After adjustment for demographics, ever use of breast MRI was associated with actual and perceived risk. Odds ratios (OR) were 12.29 (95% CI, 8.85-17.06), 2.48 (95% CI, 2.27-2.71), and 2.50 (95% CI, 2.09-2.99) for positive BRCA1/2 test, lifetime breast cancer risk ≥ 20%, and being told by a health care provider of higher risk, respectively. Women who believed they had much higher risk than others or had higher level of worry were twice as likely to have had breast MRI; OR = 2.23 (95% CI, 1.82-2.75) and OR = 1.76 (95% CI, 1.52-2.04). Patterns were similar among women at high risk. Breast cancer risk, provider communication, and personal beliefs were determinants of breast MRI use. To support shared decisions about the use of breast MRI, women could benefit from improved understanding of the chances of getting breast cancer and increased quality of provider communications.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast magnetic resonance imaging; cancer beliefs; family history; provider communication; screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29781100      PMCID: PMC6141343          DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  23 in total

Review 1.  Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Assessing women at high risk of breast cancer: a review of risk assessment models.

Authors:  Eitan Amir; Orit C Freedman; Bostjan Seruga; D Gareth Evans
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging improves breast screening sensitivity in BRCA mutation carriers age ≥ 50 years: evidence from an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuan-Anh Phi; Nehmat Houssami; Inge-Marie Obdeijn; Ellen Warner; Francesco Sardanelli; Martin O Leach; Christopher C Riedl; Isabelle Trop; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Rodica Mandel; Filippo Santoro; Gek Kwan-Lim; Thomas H Helbich; Harry J de Koning; Edwin R Van den Heuvel; Geertruida H de Bock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  G Parmigiani; D Berry; O Aguilar
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Risk-benefit profiles of women using tamoxifen for chemoprevention.

Authors:  Hazel B Nichols; Lisa A DeRoo; Daniel R Scharf; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  MRI for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Monica Morrow; Janet Waters; Elizabeth Morris
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Ellen Warner; Hans Messersmith; Petrina Causer; Andrea Eisen; Rene Shumak; Donald Plewes
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Breast MRI use uncommon among U.S. women.

Authors:  Jacqueline W Miller; Susan A Sabatino; Trevor D Thompson; Nancy Breen; Mary C White; A Blythe Ryerson; Stephen Taplin; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Cognitive and affective influences on perceived risk of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Lucy A Peipins; Frances McCarty; Nikki A Hawkins; Juan L Rodriguez; Lawrence E Scholl; Steven Leadbetter
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Wendy B DeMartini; Laura Ichikawa; Constance D Lehman; Tracy Onega; Karla Kerlikowske; Louise M Henderson; Berta M Geller; Mike Hofmann; Bonnie C Yankaskas
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 21.873

View more
  1 in total

1.  Association of Family History with the Development of Breast Cancer: A Cohort Study of 129,374 Women in KoGES Data.

Authors:  Hyo Geun Choi; Jung Ho Park; Yeon Ju Choi; Yong Joon Suh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.