Hazel B Nichols1, Lisa A DeRoo2, Daniel R Scharf2, Dale P Sandler2. 1. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC (HBN); Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway (LAD); Westat, Durham, NC (DS); Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC (DPS). hazel.nichols@unc.edu. 2. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC (HBN); Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway (LAD); Westat, Durham, NC (DS); Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC (DPS).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen has been US Food and Drug Administration-approved for primary prevention of breast cancer since 1998 but has not been widely adopted, in part because of increased risk of serious side effects. Little is known about the risk-benefit profiles of women who use chemoprevention outside of a clinical trial. We examined characteristics associated with initiation and discontinuation of tamoxifen for primary prevention of breast cancer within a large cohort of women with a first-degree family history of breast cancer. METHODS: This research was conducted within The Sister Study, a cohort of 50884 US and Puerto Rican women age 35 to 74 years enrolled from 2003 to 2009. Eligible women were breast cancer-free at enrollment and had a sister who had been diagnosed with breast cancer. Participants reported tamoxifen use, ages started and stopped taking tamoxifen, and total duration of use at enrollment. We identified 788 tamoxifen users and 3131 nonusers matched on age and year of enrollment who had no history of contraindicating factors (stroke, transient ischemic attack, cataract, endometrial or uterine cancer). Characteristics associated with tamoxifen initiation were evaluated with multivariable conditional logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Based on published risk-benefit indices, 20% of women who used tamoxifen had insufficient evidence that the benefits of tamoxifen outweigh the risk of serious side effects. After 4.5 years, 46% of women had discontinued tamoxifen. CONCLUSIONS: While the majority of women who used tamoxifen for primary prevention of breast cancer were likely to benefit, substantial discontinuation of tamoxifen before five years and use by women at risk of serious side effects may attenuate benefits for breast cancer prevention. Published by Oxford University Press 2014.
BACKGROUND:Tamoxifen has been US Food and Drug Administration-approved for primary prevention of breast cancer since 1998 but has not been widely adopted, in part because of increased risk of serious side effects. Little is known about the risk-benefit profiles of women who use chemoprevention outside of a clinical trial. We examined characteristics associated with initiation and discontinuation of tamoxifen for primary prevention of breast cancer within a large cohort of women with a first-degree family history of breast cancer. METHODS: This research was conducted within The Sister Study, a cohort of 50884 US and Puerto Rican women age 35 to 74 years enrolled from 2003 to 2009. Eligible women were breast cancer-free at enrollment and had a sister who had been diagnosed with breast cancer. Participants reported tamoxifen use, ages started and stopped taking tamoxifen, and total duration of use at enrollment. We identified 788 tamoxifen users and 3131 nonusers matched on age and year of enrollment who had no history of contraindicating factors (stroke, transient ischemic attack, cataract, endometrial or uterine cancer). Characteristics associated with tamoxifen initiation were evaluated with multivariable conditional logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Based on published risk-benefit indices, 20% of women who used tamoxifen had insufficient evidence that the benefits of tamoxifen outweigh the risk of serious side effects. After 4.5 years, 46% of women had discontinued tamoxifen. CONCLUSIONS: While the majority of women who used tamoxifen for primary prevention of breast cancer were likely to benefit, substantial discontinuation of tamoxifen before five years and use by women at risk of serious side effects may attenuate benefits for breast cancer prevention. Published by Oxford University Press 2014.
Authors: Paul E Goss; James N Ingle; José E Alés-Martínez; Angela M Cheung; Rowan T Chlebowski; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Anne McTiernan; John Robbins; Karen C Johnson; Lisa W Martin; Eric Winquist; Gloria E Sarto; Judy E Garber; Carol J Fabian; Pascal Pujol; Elizabeth Maunsell; Patricia Farmer; Karen A Gelmon; Dongsheng Tu; Harriet Richardson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Erika A Waters; Timothy S McNeel; Worta McCaskill Stevens; Andrew N Freedman Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Lori Mosca; Peter Collins; Mary Jane Geiger; Deborah Grady; Marcel Kornitzer; Michelle A McNabb; Nanette K Wenger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-07-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J Cuzick; J Forbes; R Edwards; M Baum; S Cawthorn; A Coates; A Hamed; A Howell; T Powles Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-09-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: U Veronesi; P Maisonneuve; A Costa; V Sacchini; C Maltoni; C Robertson; N Rotmensz; P Boyle Journal: Lancet Date: 1998-07-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Yong-Moon Mark Park; Alexandra J White; Hazel B Nichols; Katie M O'Brien; Clarice R Weinberg; Dale P Sandler Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2017-03-28 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Mary C White; Ashwini Soman; Clarice R Weinberg; Juan L Rodriguez; Susan A Sabatino; Lucy A Peipins; Lisa DeRoo; Hazel B Nichols; M Elizabeth Hodgson; Dale P Sandler Journal: Breast J Date: 2018-05-20 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Frank L Meyskens; Hasan Mukhtar; Cheryl L Rock; Jack Cuzick; Thomas W Kensler; Chung S Yang; Scott D Ramsey; Scott M Lippman; David S Alberts Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-11-07 Impact factor: 13.506