| Literature DB >> 29780838 |
Palaniswamy Aravindh1, Tianyi Wu2, Chloe Xiaoyun Chan2, Keng Lin Wong1, Lingaraj Krishna1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are frequently associated with bone bruises, and their presence may be associated with concomitant intra- and extra-articular injuries.Entities:
Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament; bone bruise; magnetic resonance imaging; noncontact sports trauma
Year: 2018 PMID: 29780838 PMCID: PMC5954320 DOI: 10.1177/2325967118767625
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop J Sports Med ISSN: 2325-9671
Figure 1.Flowchart of patient selection. ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PCL, posterior cruciate ligament.
Figure 2.(A, B) Coronal proton density–weighted fat-saturated images and (C) fat-suppressed T2-weighted image illustrating bone bruising in both the medial and lateral compartments with a grade 2 injury of the medial collateral ligament (white triangle) with a lateral meniscal tear (solid arrow) in the posterior horn and body.
Figure 3.(A, B) Coronal proton density–weighted fat-saturated images showing bone bruising in both the medial and lateral compartments with periligamentous high-signal intensity in the medial collateral ligament (white triangle) and lateral collateral ligament (right-facing arrow), suggestive of a grade 2 injury. (C) Fat-suppressed T2-weighted image illustrating bone bruising on the lateral femoral condyle and tibial plateau with a full-thickness lateral meniscal tear (left-facing arrow) in the posterior horn.
Patient Demographics (N = 168)
| n (%) | |
|---|---|
| Age at the time of injury, y | |
| ≤25 y | 113 (67.3) |
| >25 | 55 (32.7) |
| Sex | |
| Male | 126 (75.0) |
| Female | 42 (25.0) |
| Race | |
| Chinese | 91 (54.2) |
| Malay | 38 (22.6) |
| Indian | 20 (11.9) |
| Other | 19 (11.3) |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | |
| ≤25.0 | 99 (58.9) |
| >25.0 | 50 (29.8) |
| Missing | 19 (11.3) |
Bone Bruise Characteristics
| n (%) | |
|---|---|
| Presence | |
| Present | 155 (92.3) |
| Absent | 13 (7.7) |
| Site | |
| Lateral femoral condyle | 132 (78.6) |
| Lateral tibial plateau | 141 (83.9) |
| Medial femoral condyle | 50 (29.8) |
| Medial tibial plateau | 95 (56.5) |
| Compartment | |
| Absent | 13 (7.7) |
| Isolated medial | 4 (2.4) |
| Isolated lateral | 41 (24.4) |
| Medial and lateral | 110 (65.5) |
| Extent | |
| Localized (≤2 of 4 sites) | 74 (44.0) |
| Diffuse (>2 of 4 sites) | 94 (56.0) |
Associated Injuries
| n (%) | |
|---|---|
| Meniscal | |
| Medial | 66 (39.3) |
| Lateral | 63 (37.5) |
| Chondral | 18 (10.7) |
| Collateral ligament | |
| Medial | 83 (49.4) |
| Grade 1 | 28 (16.7) |
| Grade 2 | 40 (23.8) |
| Grade 3 | 15 (8.9) |
| Lateral | 66 (39.3) |
| Grade 1 | 36 (21.4) |
| Grade 2 | 22 (13.1) |
| Grade 3 | 8 (4.8) |
Logistic Regression Analyses
| Bone Bruises Absent (n = 13) | Bone Bruises Present (n = 155) | Univariate | Multivariate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) | |||
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | 9 (69.2) | 117 (75.5) | 1.00 | |||
| Female | 4 (30.8) | 38 (24.5) | .62 | 0.73 (0.21-2.51) | ||
| Age, y | 25.5 ± 6.8 | 25.2 ± 7.1 | ||||
| ≤25 | 10 (76.9) | 103 (66.5) | 1.00 | |||
| >25 | 3 (23.1) | 52 (33.5) | .44 | 1.68 (0.44-6.38) | ||
| Race | ||||||
| Chinese | 7 (53.8) | 84 (54.2) | 1.00 | |||
| Malay | 2 (15.4) | 36 (23.2) | .62 | 1.50 (0.30-7.57) | ||
| Indian | 1 (7.7) | 19 (12.3) | .67 | 1.58 (0.18-13.64) | ||
| Other | 3 (23.1) | 16 (10.3) | .27 | 0.44 (0.10-1.90) | ||
| BMI, kg/m2 | ||||||
| ≤25.0 | 8 (61.5) | 91 (58.7) | 1.00 | |||
| >25.0 | 4 (30.8) | 46 (29.7) | .99 | 1.01 (0.29-3.53) | ||
| MCL injury | ||||||
| No | 9 (69.2) | 76 (49.0) | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 4 (30.8) | 79 (51.0) | .16 | 2.34 (0.69-7.92) | ||
| LCL injury | ||||||
| No | 11 (84.6) | 91 (58.7) | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 2 (15.4) | 64 (41.3) | .07 | 3.87 (0.83-18.05) | .10 | 3.70 (0.78-17.52) |
| Chondral injury | ||||||
| No | 13 (100.0) | 137 (88.4) | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 0 (0.0) | 18 (11.6) | .19 | NA | ||
| Medial meniscal injury | ||||||
| No | 8 (61.5) | 94 (60.6) | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 5 (38.5) | 61 (39.4) | .95 | 1.04 (0.33-3.32) | ||
| Lateral meniscal injury | ||||||
| No | 12 (92.3) | 93 (60.0) | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 1 (7.7) | 62 (40.0) | .02 | 8.00 (1.01-63.09) | .05 | 7.73 (0.97-61.34) |
Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± SD unless otherwise specified. BMI, body mass index; LCL, lateral collateral ligament; MCL, medial collateral ligament; NA, not applicable; OR, odds ratio.
Figure 4.Bar graphs showing the prevalence of lateral meniscal, medial and lateral collateral ligament, medial meniscal, and chondral injuries according to the involved compartment.
Logistic Regression Analyses on Extent of Bone Bruises
| Localized Bone Bruises (n = 74) | Diffuse Bone Bruises (n = 94) | Univariate | Multivariate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) | |||
| MCL injury | ||||||
| No | 48 (69.2) | 37 (70.7) | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Yes | 26 (30.8) | 57 (29.3) | .001 | 2.84 (1.51-5.35) | .005 | 2.58 (1.34-4.98) |
| LCL injury | ||||||
| No | 51 (84.6) | 51 (68.3) | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Yes | 23 (15.4) | 43 (31.7) | .053 | 1.87 (0.99-3.54) | .307 | 1.42 (0.72-2.81) |
| Chondral injury | ||||||
| No | 67 (100.0) | 83 (92.7) | 1.0 | |||
| Yes | 7 (0.0) | 11 (7.3) | .641 | NA | ||
| Medial meniscal injury | ||||||
| No | 49 (61.5) | 56 (68.3) | 1.0 | |||
| Yes | 25 (38.5) | 38 (31.7) | .982 | 1.01 (0.54-1.88) | ||
| Lateral meniscal injury | ||||||
| No | 45 (92.3) | 57 (61.0) | 1.0 | |||
| Yes | 29 (7.7) | 37 (39.0) | .377 | 1.33 (0.71-2.51) | ||
Data are presented as n (%) unless otherwise specified. LCL, lateral collateral ligament; MCL, medial collateral ligament; NA, not applicable.