Literature DB >> 18326830

Twelve-year follow-up on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: long-term outcomes of prospectively studied osseous and articular injuries.

Bryan T Hanypsiak1, Kurt P Spindler, Christopher R Rothrock, Gary J Calabrese, Brad Richmond, Todd M Herrenbruck, Richard D Parker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although successful at restoring near normal laxity to the knee in the short term, anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions have not been shown to prevent the development of posttraumatic arthritis. HYPOTHESIS: Bone bruises and articular cartilage injuries sustained at the time of initial injury (1991) would not resolve. Our secondary hypothesis was that the presence of a bone bruise or articular cartilage injury originally identified on magnetic resonance imaging would not be associated with long-term outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction evaluated by the International Knee Documentation Committee questionnaire. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 1.
METHODS: We attempted to contact all patients from an original cohort (N = 54) for follow-up evaluation, which included repeat radiographs, magnetic resonance images, physical examination, and International Knee Documentation Committee questionnaire more than a decade postoperatively.
RESULTS: Forty-four patients (82% of the original cohort) returned for on-site follow-up. No patient with a bone bruise identified on original magnetic resonance imaging had one identified at 12-year follow-up. The mean ( +/- SD) International Knee Documentation Committee score at follow-up with no bone bruise originally present was 70.6 ( +/- 12.7) versus 70.0 ( +/- 8.1) when a bone bruise was observed (P > .05). No consistent association was observed between the presence of an initial articular cartilage lesion with a lesion on follow-up magnetic resonance images. The mean ( +/- SD) International Knee Documentation Committee score at follow-up with no articular cartilage injury was 69.0 ( +/- 11.9) versus 72.8 ( +/- 12.0) with articular cartilage lesion (P > .05).
CONCLUSION: All bone bruises identified in our study with magnetic resonance imaging at the time of initial injury had resolved at 12-year follow-up. The presence of a bone bruise at the time of initial injury did not significantly alter the patient-oriented outcome by International Knee Documentation Committee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Additionally, articular cartilage abnormality on magnetic resonance imaging did not influence the International Knee Documentation Committee score.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18326830     DOI: 10.1177/0363546508315468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  40 in total

Review 1.  Ipsilateral graft and contralateral ACL rupture at five years or more following ACL reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rick W Wright; Robert A Magnussen; Warren R Dunn; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Patient-Reported Outcomes One to Five Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: The Effect of Combined Injury and Associations With Osteoarthritis Features Defined on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Brooke E Patterson; Adam G Culvenor; Christian J Barton; Ali Guermazi; Joshua J Stefanik; Kay M Crossley
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 3.  Should Return to Sport be Delayed Until 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? Biological and Functional Considerations.

Authors:  Christopher V Nagelli; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Which preoperative factors, including bone bruise, are associated with knee pain/symptoms at index anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR)? A Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) ACLR Cohort Study.

Authors:  Warren R Dunn; Kurt P Spindler; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert G Marx; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Frank E Harrell; Angel Q An; Rick W Wright; Robert H Brophy; Matthew J Matava; David C Flanigan; Laura J Huston; Morgan H Jones; Michelle L Wolcott; Armando F Vidal; Brian R Wolf
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 5.  Do cartilage lesions affect the clinical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Filardo; Francesca de Caro; Luca Andriolo; Elizaveta Kon; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Bone marrow edema-like lesions (BMELs) are associated with higher T and T2 values of cartilage in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-reconstructed knees: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Jingshan Gong; Valentina Pedoia; Luca Facchetti; Thomas M Link; C Benjamin Ma; Xiaojuan Li
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

7.  Limited evidence that the presence of a bone bruise alone affects the clinical outcome of surgically reconstructed anterior cruciate ligaments: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brian E Walczak; Cody Lukes; Ned Amendola; Warren R Dunn
Journal:  J ISAKOS       Date:  2017-07-27

8.  The effect of patient and injury factors on long-term outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Curr Orthop Pract       Date:  2011-01-01

Review 9.  To MOON and Back: Lessons Learned and Experience Gained Along the Way.

Authors:  José F Vega; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.182

10.  Full-thickness cartilage lesion do not affect knee function in patients with ACL injury.

Authors:  Vegar Hjermundrud; Tonje Kvist Bjune; May Arna Risberg; Lars Engebretsen; Asbjørn Arøen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.