Literature DB >> 29778855

Myocardial Strain in Prediction of Outcomes After Surgery for Severe Mitral Regurgitation.

Hyue Mee Kim1, Goo-Yeong Cho2, In-Chang Hwang1, Hong-Mi Choi3, Jun-Bean Park4, Yeonyee E Yoon3, Hyung-Kwan Kim4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a better predictor of clinical events after surgery for mitral regurgitation (MR) than conventional parameters.
BACKGROUND: The optimal timing for surgery is guided by left ventricular (LV) dimension or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), even though normal LVEF can mask depressed LV systolic function in severe mitral MR.
METHODS: From 2006 to 2016, 506 patients (age 58.5 ± 13.7 years, 54.3% male) with severe primary MR who underwent mitral valve surgery were included. We measured GLS and global circumferential strain. Cardiac events included admission for worsening heart failure (HF), reoperation for failure of MV surgery, and cardiac death.
RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 3.5 years, 56 (11.1%) patients died, 41 (8.1%) were hospitalized for HF, and 10 (2.0%) underwent reoperation. In univariate analysis, LVEF, atrial fibrillation, left atrial dimension, age, previous ischemia, concomitant coronary artery bypass graft, and both GLS and global circumferential strain were predictive of cardiac events. On multivariate Cox models, age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.429, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.116 to 1.831; p = 0.005), left atrial dimension (HR: 1.034, 95% CI: 1.006 to 1.063; p = 0.019) and GLS (HR: 1.229, 95% CI: 1.135 to 1.331; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of cardiac events. In subgroup analysis, LV GLS was a significant predictor of cardiac outcome, regardless of the presence of LV dysfunction, the presence of atrial fibrillation, and the type of surgery. Impaired GLS was associated with all-cause mortality (HR: 1.068, 95% CI: 1.003 to 1.136; p = 0.040).
CONCLUSIONS: GLS appears to be a better predictor of cardiac events all-cause death than conventional parameters. Measuring preoperative GLS is helpful to predict post-operative outcome and determine optimal timing for surgery in patients with severe primary MR.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  global longitudinal strain; mitral regurgitation; mitral valve repair; mitral valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29778855     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  20 in total

Review 1.  Review: application of current imaging modalities in the management of left-sided valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Robert Zheng; Kenya Kusunose
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

2.  Predictors of moderate to severe ischemic mitral regurgitation after myocardial infarction: a cardiac magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  Chen Zhang; Lei Zhao; Enjun Zhu; Paul Schoenhagen; Jie Tian; Yong-Qiang Lai; Xiaohai Ma
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Prognostic value of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in mitral regurgitation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hiroki Ueyama; Toshiki Kuno; Hisato Takagi; Parasuram Krishnamoorthy; Francesca Romana Prandi; Alberto Palazzuoli; Samin K Sharma; Annapoorna Kini; Stamatios Lerakis
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Application of a new modality for assessing left ventricular function: can strain replace ejection fraction?

Authors:  Sung Yong Park
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-09-21

5.  Prognostic value of left ventricular apical four-chamber longitudinal strain after heart valve surgery in real-world practice.

Authors:  Jae-Sik Nam; Ji-Hyun Chin; Hyun-Uk Kang; Juyoun Kim; Kyoung-Woon Joung; In-Cheol Choi
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-06-15

6.  Improvement in Left Cardiac Function Following Mitral Valve Repair: Analyses Based on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Hayata; Noriyoshi Sawabata; Takehisa Abe; Tomoaki Hirose; Keigo Yamashita; Shun Hiraga; Ryohei Fukuba; Junichi Takemura; Tomoya Nakano; Yoshihiko Saito; Shigeki Taniguchi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 7.  Application of strain echocardiography in valvular heart diseases.

Authors:  Marta Cvijic; Jens-Uwe Voigt
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.596

8.  Repair versus replacement of mitral valves in cases of severe rheumatic mitral stenosis: mid-term clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Yuqing Jiao; Tiange Luo; Haibo Zhang; Jie Han; Yan Li; Yixin Jia; Shuai Zheng; Xu Meng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Two and Three-Dimensional Echocardiography in Primary Mitral Regurgitation: Practical Hints to Optimize the Surgical Planning.

Authors:  Maria Concetta Pastore; Giulia Elena Mandoli; Anna Sannino; Aleksander Dokollari; Gianluigi Bisleri; Flavio D'Ascenzi; Luna Cavigli; Annalisa Pasquini; Matteo Lisi; Nicolò Ghionzoli; Ciro Santoro; Marcelo Haertel Miglioranza; Marta Focardi; Giuseppe Patti; Serafina Valente; Sergio Mondillo; Matteo Cameli
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-07-08

10.  Cardiac Remodeling after Surgical Mitral Valvuloplasty for Barlow's Disease: Is it the Time to Look to the Load?

Authors:  Nicolino Esposito; Maria Vincenza Polito; Giacomo Mattiello; Maurizio Galderisi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Echogr       Date:  2021-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.