Tory R Spindle1, Soha Talih2, Marzena M Hiler1, Nareg Karaoghlanian2, Matthew S Halquist3, Alison B Breland1, Alan Shihadeh2, Thomas Eissenberg4. 1. Department of Psychology, Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States. 2. Department of Psychology, Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States; Department of Mechanical Engineering, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. 3. Department of Pharmaceutics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States. 4. Department of Psychology, Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States. Electronic address: teissenb@vcu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Electronic cigarettes (ECIGs) are a class of tobacco products that produce different effects (e.g., nicotine delivery), depending on the device, liquid, and behavioral factors. However, the influence of the two primary ECIG liquid solvents, propylene glycol (PG) and vegetable glycerin (VG), on ECIG acute effects is unknown. METHODS: Thirty ECIG-experienced, ≥12-h nicotine- abstinent participants completed four conditions consisting of two ECIG-use bouts (10 puffs, 30 s interpuff-interval) differing only by liquid PG:VG ratio (2PG:98VG, 20PG:80VG, 55PG:45VG, 100PG). Device power (7.3 W) and liquid nicotine concentration (18 mg/ml) remained constant. Nicotine delivery, subjective effects, heart rate (HR), and puff topography were assessed. RESULTS: In the 100PG condition, participants took shorter and smaller puffs but obtained significantly more nicotine relative to the two VG-based conditions. Total nicotine exposure (i.e., area under the curve) was also significantly higher during use of the two PG-based liquids. However, participants reported that the 100 PG liquid was significantly less "pleasant" and "satisfying" relative to the other liquids (all ps < .05). Increases in HR and decreases in abstinence symptoms (e.g., "craving") did not differ across conditions. CONCLUSIONS: PG:VG ratio influenced nicotine delivery, some subjective effects, and puff topography. Lower overall product satisfaction associated with the 100PG liquid suggests factors other than nicotine delivery (e.g., aerosol visibility) may play a role in maintaining ECIG use. Regulating ECIG acute effects such as nicotine delivery and subjective effects may require simultaneous attention to liquid PG:VG ratio as well as device, liquid, and behavioral factors known to influence these outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Electronic cigarettes (ECIGs) are a class of tobacco products that produce different effects (e.g., nicotine delivery), depending on the device, liquid, and behavioral factors. However, the influence of the two primary ECIG liquid solvents, propylene glycol (PG) and vegetable glycerin (VG), on ECIG acute effects is unknown. METHODS: Thirty ECIG-experienced, ≥12-h nicotine- abstinent participants completed four conditions consisting of two ECIG-use bouts (10 puffs, 30 s interpuff-interval) differing only by liquid PG:VG ratio (2PG:98VG, 20PG:80VG, 55PG:45VG, 100PG). Device power (7.3 W) and liquid nicotine concentration (18 mg/ml) remained constant. Nicotine delivery, subjective effects, heart rate (HR), and puff topography were assessed. RESULTS: In the 100PG condition, participants took shorter and smaller puffs but obtained significantly more nicotine relative to the two VG-based conditions. Total nicotine exposure (i.e., area under the curve) was also significantly higher during use of the two PG-based liquids. However, participants reported that the 100 PG liquid was significantly less "pleasant" and "satisfying" relative to the other liquids (all ps < .05). Increases in HR and decreases in abstinence symptoms (e.g., "craving") did not differ across conditions. CONCLUSIONS:PG:VG ratio influenced nicotine delivery, some subjective effects, and puff topography. Lower overall product satisfaction associated with the 100PG liquid suggests factors other than nicotine delivery (e.g., aerosol visibility) may play a role in maintaining ECIG use. Regulating ECIG acute effects such as nicotine delivery and subjective effects may require simultaneous attention to liquid PG:VG ratio as well as device, liquid, and behavioral factors known to influence these outcomes.
Authors: Sarah E Evans; Melissa Blank; Cynthia Sams; Michael F Weaver; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Alison Breland; Eric Soule; Alexa Lopez; Carolina Ramôa; Ahmad El-Hellani; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Leon Kosmider; Andrzej Sobczak; Maciej Fik; Jakub Knysak; Marzena Zaciera; Jolanta Kurek; Maciej Lukasz Goniewicz Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Ahmed Jamal; Andrea Gentzke; S Sean Hu; Karen A Cullen; Benjamin J Apelberg; David M Homa; Brian A King Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Brett R Winters; Tavleen K Kochar; Phillip W Clapp; Ilona Jaspers; Michael C Madden Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Melissa D Blank; Jennifer Pearson; Caroline O Cobb; Nicholas J Felicione; Marzena M Hiler; Tory R Spindle; Alison Breland Journal: Tob Control Date: 2019-11-04 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Tracy T Smith; Bryan W Heckman; Amy E Wahlquist; K Michael Cummings; Matthew J Carpenter Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Alison Breland; Sarah F Maloney; Eric K Soule; Carolina Ramôa; Andrew Barnes; Thokozeni Lipato; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 3.157