Abigail M Schnaith1, Erica M Evans2, Caleb Vogt3, Andrea M Tinsay4, Thomas E Schmidt5, Katelyn M Tessier6, Britt K Erickson7. 1. University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States. Electronic address: schna104@umn.edu. 2. University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States. Electronic address: sande892@umn.edu. 3. University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States. Electronic address: vogtx127@umn.edu. 4. University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States. Electronic address: tinsa025@umn.edu. 5. University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States. Electronic address: schm1610@umn.edu. 6. Masonic Cancer Center Biostatistics Core, University of Minnesota, 717 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States. Electronic address: tessi022@umn.edu. 7. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States. Electronic address: bkeric@umn.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vaccination rates against Human Papillomavirus (HPV) in the US remain alarmingly low. Physicians can significantly influence a parent's decision to vaccinate their children. However, medical education often lacks training on specific strategies for communicating with vaccine hesitant parents. METHODS: We created an innovative curriculum designed to teach medical students how to address HPV vaccine hesitancy. The curriculum consisted of (1) a presentation on the epidemiology, biology, and disease morbidity associated with HPV, (2) a video that teaches specific communication strategies and (3) role-playing simulations. This curriculum was delivered to medical students at two separate sites. Medical students were surveyed before and after completing the educational curriculum. The surveys assessed student comfort talking to HPV vaccine hesitant parents and their likelihood to recommend the HPV vaccine. RESULTS: Pre- and post-intervention surveys were completed by 101 of the 132 participants (77% response rate). After the intervention, student awareness of the benefits of the HPV vaccine increased by a mean of 0.82 points (Likert scale 1-5, p < 0.01) and student comfort talking to vaccine hesitant parents increased by a mean of 1.37 points (p < 0.01). Prior to the intervention, students more strongly recommended the HPV vaccine to females compared to males, but this gender disparity was eliminated after the intervention (p < 0.01). Personal vaccination status was independately associated with a higher likelihood of recommending the HPV vaccine both before and after the intervention. CONCLUSION: Our innovative curriculum improved medical student comfort level discussing HPV vaccination with hesitant parents and increased the perceived likelihood of recommending HPV vaccination. The intervention is easy to implement, scalable, and requires minimal resources. Educating future providers on this important topic has the potential to improve vaccination rates nationwide and thus should be considered for all medical students.
BACKGROUND: Vaccination rates against Human Papillomavirus (HPV) in the US remain alarmingly low. Physicians can significantly influence a parent's decision to vaccinate their children. However, medical education often lacks training on specific strategies for communicating with vaccine hesitant parents. METHODS: We created an innovative curriculum designed to teach medical students how to address HPV vaccine hesitancy. The curriculum consisted of (1) a presentation on the epidemiology, biology, and disease morbidity associated with HPV, (2) a video that teaches specific communication strategies and (3) role-playing simulations. This curriculum was delivered to medical students at two separate sites. Medical students were surveyed before and after completing the educational curriculum. The surveys assessed student comfort talking to HPV vaccine hesitant parents and their likelihood to recommend the HPV vaccine. RESULTS: Pre- and post-intervention surveys were completed by 101 of the 132 participants (77% response rate). After the intervention, student awareness of the benefits of the HPV vaccine increased by a mean of 0.82 points (Likert scale 1-5, p < 0.01) and student comfort talking to vaccine hesitant parents increased by a mean of 1.37 points (p < 0.01). Prior to the intervention, students more strongly recommended the HPV vaccine to females compared to males, but this gender disparity was eliminated after the intervention (p < 0.01). Personal vaccination status was independately associated with a higher likelihood of recommending the HPV vaccine both before and after the intervention. CONCLUSION: Our innovative curriculum improved medical student comfort level discussing HPV vaccination with hesitant parents and increased the perceived likelihood of recommending HPV vaccination. The intervention is easy to implement, scalable, and requires minimal resources. Educating future providers on this important topic has the potential to improve vaccination rates nationwide and thus should be considered for all medical students.
Authors: Douglas J Opel; John Heritage; James A Taylor; Rita Mangione-Smith; Halle Showalter Salas; Victoria Devere; Chuan Zhou; Jeffrey D Robinson Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-11-04 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Mona Saraiya; Elizabeth R Unger; Trevor D Thompson; Charles F Lynch; Brenda Y Hernandez; Christopher W Lyu; Martin Steinau; Meg Watson; Edward J Wilkinson; Claudia Hopenhayn; Glenn Copeland; Wendy Cozen; Edward S Peters; Youjie Huang; Maria Sibug Saber; Sean Altekruse; Marc T Goodman Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Noel T Brewer; Sami L Gottlieb; Paul L Reiter; Annie-Laurie McRee; Nicole Liddon; Lauri Markowitz; Jennifer S Smith Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Melissa B Gilkey; William A Calo; Jennifer L Moss; Parth D Shah; Macary W Marciniak; Noel T Brewer Journal: Vaccine Date: 2016-01-24 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Arati Kelekar; Ida Rubino; Maurice Kavanagh; Robin Lewis-Bedz; Gabrielle LeClerc; Leon Pedell; Nelia Afonso Journal: Med Sci Educ Date: 2022-01-21