Literature DB >> 29777945

Patterns of care and outcomes of chemoradiation versus radiation alone for MGMT promoter unmethylated glioblastoma.

Anna Lee1, Nikita Malakhov2, Niki Sheth3, Arthur Wang4, Peter Han2, David Schreiber5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The recommended treatment for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter unmethylated glioblastoma (GBM) is radiation therapy with concurrent/adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). However, it is well known that the clinical benefit from TMZ is lower in these patients. We sought to analyze patterns of care and outcomes of chemoradiation versus radiation alone in this cohort using a large, hospital database. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with MGMT promoter unmethylated GBM from 2010 to 2012 who received radiation (RT) or chemoradiation (CRT) were identified in the National Cancer Database. Logistic regression was performed to assess for predictors of receiving chemoradiation. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess overall survival (OS) by treatment group and Cox regression analysis was used to assess impact of covariates on OS.
RESULTS: There were 738 patients who met the study criteria, of which 107 (14.5%) received RT alone and 631 (85.5%) received CRT with median RT dose 6000cGy for both groups. Median follow up for living patients was 21.9 months. Ninety-two (12.5%) patients did not undergo any resection, 330 (44.7%) underwent a subtotal resection and 316 (42.8%) had a gross total resection. The median and 2-year OS was 16.8 months and 24.7% for RT alone compared to 15.6 months and 25.9% for the CRT group (p = 0.250). On multivariable analysis, the addition of chemotherapy had no impact on survival (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.86-1.46, p = 0.396).
CONCLUSION: Despite the routine use of chemoradiation among patients with MGMT promoter unmethylated GBM, there does not appear to be a survival benefit compared to radiation alone.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GBM; Glioblastoma; MGMT promoter unmethylation; NCDB; Neuro-oncology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29777945     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  4 in total

1.  Magnetic calcium phosphates nanocomposites for the intracellular hyperthermia of cancers of bone and brain.

Authors:  Alessio Adamiano; Victoria M Wu; Francesca Carella; Gianrico Lamura; Fabio Canepa; Anna Tampieri; Michele Iafisco; Vuk Uskoković
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.307

2.  Treatment and surgical factors associated with longer-term glioblastoma survival: a National Cancer Database study.

Authors:  Sindhoosha Malay; Eashwar Somasundaram; Nirav Patil; Robin Buerki; Andrew Sloan; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2020-06-04

3.  Epigenetic preconditioning with decitabine sensitizes glioblastoma to temozolomide via induction of MLH1.

Authors:  Matthew Gallitto; Rossana Cheng He; Julio F Inocencio; Huaien Wang; Yizhou Zhang; Gintaras Deikus; Isaac Wasserman; Maya Strahl; Melissa Smith; Robert Sebra; Raymund L Yong
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Histone 2A Family Member J Drives Mesenchymal Transition and Temozolomide Resistance in Glioblastoma Multiforme.

Authors:  Hsun-Hua Lee; Che-Hsuan Lin; Hui-Yu Lin; Chia-Hao Kuei; Jing-Quan Zheng; Yuan-Hung Wang; Long-Sheng Lu; Fei-Peng Lee; Chaur-Jong Hu; Dean Wu; Yuan-Feng Lin
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.