Literature DB >> 29777385

Changes in selection intensity on the mitogenome of subterranean and fossorial rodents respective to aboveground species.

William Corrêa Tavares1,2, Hector N Seuánez3,4.   

Abstract

Several rodent lineages independently acquired the ability to dig complex networks of tunnels where fossorial and subterranean species spend part or their whole life, respectively. Their underground lifestyles imposed harsh physiological demands, presumably triggering strong selective pressures on genes involved in energy metabolism like those coding for mitochondrial proteins. Moreover, underground lifestyles must have increased inbreeding and susceptibility to population bottlenecks as well as restricted migration, leading to small effective population size (Ne) that, in turn, must have reduced the effectiveness of selection. These stringent environmental conditions and small Ne might be still operating as antagonist factors of selection efficacy in these rodents. In this report, we tested, in a phylogenetic framework, how the intensity of selection on protein-coding mitochondrial genes (mt-genes) fluctuated along the evolution of fossorial and subterranean rodents respective to aboveground lineages. Our findings showed significant selection relaxation in most mt-genes of subterranean hystricomorphs (African mole-rats, tuco-tucos, and coruro), while only in three mt-genes of fossorial hystricomorphs (degus, red vizcacha rat, and fossorial spiny rats) selection efficacy was strongly reduced, probably due to demographic constraints. Conversely, selection intensification was found to have occurred in three mt-genes in fossorial sciuromorphs (ground squirrels, chipmunks, marmot, and allies). Our findings indicated that evolution of mitogenomes in fossorial and, mainly, in subterranean rodents was a complex output of a balance between intense ecological and physiological pressures, together with demographic constraints leading to genetic drift that, in turn, might have resulted in relaxed selection in hystricomorphs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29777385     DOI: 10.1007/s00335-018-9748-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  36 in total

1.  Quantifying the slightly deleterious mutation model of molecular evolution.

Authors:  Adam Eyre-Walker; Peter D Keightley; Nick G C Smith; Daniel Gaffney
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Datamonkey 2010: a suite of phylogenetic analysis tools for evolutionary biology.

Authors:  Wayne Delport; Art F Y Poon; Simon D W Frost; Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Ecomorphological diversification among South American spiny rats (Rodentia; Echimyidae): a phylogenetic and chronological approach.

Authors:  Thomas Galewski; Jean-François Mauffrey; Yuri L R Leite; James L Patton; Emmanuel J P Douzery
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 4.286

4.  Two mitochondrial genes under episodic positive selection in subterranean octodontoid rodents.

Authors:  Ivanna H Tomasco; Enrique P Lessa
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.688

5.  RELAX: detecting relaxed selection in a phylogenetic framework.

Authors:  Joel O Wertheim; Ben Murrell; Martin D Smith; Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond; Konrad Scheffler
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Relationships of diversity, disparity, and their evolutionary rates in squirrels (Sciuridae).

Authors:  Miriam L Zelditch; Jingchun Li; Lucy A P Tran; Donald L Swiderski
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Adaptive evolution and effective population size in wild house mice.

Authors:  Megan Phifer-Rixey; François Bonhomme; Pierre Boursot; Gary A Churchill; Jaroslav Piálek; Priscilla K Tucker; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Mitogenomic Phylogeny, Diversification, and Biogeography of South American Spiny Rats.

Authors:  Pierre-Henri Fabre; Nathan S Upham; Louise H Emmons; Fabienne Justy; Yuri L R Leite; Ana Carolina Loss; Ludovic Orlando; Marie-Ka Tilak; Bruce D Patterson; Emmanuel J P Douzery
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Genetic and geographic differentiation in the Rio Negro tuco-tuco (Ctenomys rionegrensis): inferring the roles of migration and drift from multiple genetic markers.

Authors:  Gabriela Wlasiuk; John Carlos Garza; Enrique P Lessa
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space.

Authors:  Fredrik Ronquist; Maxim Teslenko; Paul van der Mark; Daniel L Ayres; Aaron Darling; Sebastian Höhna; Bret Larget; Liang Liu; Marc A Suchard; John P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 15.683

View more
  3 in total

1.  Design principles of gene evolution for niche adaptation through changes in protein-protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Gon Carmi; Somnath Tagore; Alessandro Gorohovski; Aviad Sivan; Dorith Raviv-Shay; Milana Frenkel-Morgenstern
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Signatures of Adaptation in Mitochondrial Genomes of Palearctic Subterranean Voles (Arvicolinae, Rodentia).

Authors:  Olga Bondareva; Evgeny Genelt-Yanovskiy; Tatyana Petrova; Semen Bodrov; Antonina Smorkatcheva; Natalia Abramson
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.096

3.  EvoProDom: evolutionary modeling of protein families by assessing translocations of protein domains.

Authors:  Gon Carmi; Alessandro Gorohovski; Milana Frenkel-Morgenstern
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 2.693

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.