Literature DB >> 22490822

Adaptive evolution and effective population size in wild house mice.

Megan Phifer-Rixey1, François Bonhomme, Pierre Boursot, Gary A Churchill, Jaroslav Piálek, Priscilla K Tucker, Michael W Nachman.   

Abstract

Estimates of the proportion of amino acid substitutions that have been fixed by selection (α) vary widely among taxa, ranging from zero in humans to over 50% in Drosophila. This wide range may reflect differences in the efficacy of selection due to differences in the effective population size (N(e)). However, most comparisons have been made among distantly related organisms that differ not only in N(e) but also in many other aspects of their biology. Here, we estimate α in three closely related lineages of house mice that have a similar ecology but differ widely in N(e): Mus musculus musculus (N(e) ∼ 25,000-120,000), M. m. domesticus (N(e) ∼ 58,000-200,000), and M. m. castaneus (N(e) ∼ 200,000-733,000). Mice were genotyped using a high-density single nucleotide polymorphism array, and the proportions of replacement and silent mutations within subspecies were compared with those fixed between each subspecies and an outgroup, Mus spretus. There was significant evidence of positive selection in M. m. castaneus, the lineage with the largest N(e), with α estimated to be approximately 40%. In contrast, estimates of α for M. m. domesticus (α = 13%) and for M. m. musculus (α = 12 %) were much smaller. Interestingly, the higher estimate of α for M. m. castaneus appears to reflect not only more adaptive fixations but also more effective purifying selection. These results support the hypothesis that differences in N(e) contribute to differences among species in the efficacy of selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22490822      PMCID: PMC3457769          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mss105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  38 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Directional selection and the site-frequency spectrum.

Authors:  C D Bustamante; J Wakeley; S Sawyer; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Slightly deleterious mutant substitutions in evolution.

Authors:  T Ohta
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-11-09       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Excess amino acid polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA: contrasts among genes from Drosophila, mice, and humans.

Authors:  D M Rand; L M Kann
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Temporal, spatial, and ecological modes of evolution of Eurasian Mus based on mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences.

Authors:  Hitoshi Suzuki; Tomofumi Shimada; Mie Terashima; Kimiyuki Tsuchiya; Ken Aplin
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.286

7.  Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution with genomic data from Drosophila.

Authors:  Justin C Fay; Gerald J Wyckoff; Chung-I Wu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nick G C Smith; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila.

Authors:  J H McDonald; M Kreitman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Pervasive natural selection in the Drosophila genome?

Authors:  Guy Sella; Dmitri A Petrov; Molly Przeworski; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  38 in total

1.  Are Synonymous Sites in Primates and Rodents Functionally Constrained?

Authors:  Nicholas Price; Dan Graur
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Phylogenetic relationship and time of divergence of Mus terricolor with reference to other Mus species.

Authors:  Mahua Rudra; Bishwanath Chatterjee; Min Bahadur
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Evidence for increased levels of positive and negative selection on the X chromosome versus autosomes in humans.

Authors:  Krishna R Veeramah; Ryan N Gutenkunst; August E Woerner; Joseph C Watkins; Michael F Hammer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Selection on Position of Nonsense Codons in Introns.

Authors:  Megan G Behringer; David W Hall
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Comparison of the Full Distribution of Fitness Effects of New Amino Acid Mutations Across Great Apes.

Authors:  David Castellano; Moisès Coll Macià; Paula Tataru; Thomas Bataillon; Kasper Munch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Whole exome sequencing of wild-derived inbred strains of mice improves power to link phenotype and genotype.

Authors:  Peter L Chang; Emily Kopania; Sara Keeble; Brice A J Sarver; Erica Larson; Annie Orth; Khalid Belkhir; Pierre Boursot; François Bonhomme; Jeffrey M Good; Matthew D Dean
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 2.957

7.  Higher Germline Mutagenesis of Genes with Stronger Testis Expressions Refutes the Transcriptional Scanning Hypothesis.

Authors:  Haoxuan Liu; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 8.  Deconstructing Mus gemischus: advances in understanding ancestry, structure, and variation in the genome of the laboratory mouse.

Authors:  John P Didion; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 9.  Adaptive evolution: evaluating empirical support for theoretical predictions.

Authors:  Carrie F Olson-Manning; Maggie R Wagner; Thomas Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 10.  Genome-wide association studies in mice.

Authors:  Jonathan Flint; Eleazar Eskin
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 53.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.