| Literature DB >> 29777147 |
Gaozhen Liang1, Chunwang Dong2, Bin Hu3, Hongkai Zhu4, Haibo Yuan5, Yongwen Jiang5, Guoshuang Hao6.
Abstract
Withering is the first step in the processing of congou black tea. With respect to the deficiency of traditional water content detection methods, a machine vision based NDT (Non Destructive Testing) method was established to detect the moisture content of withered leaves. First, according to the time sequences using computer visual system collected visible light images of tea leaf surfaces, and color and texture characteristics are extracted through the spatial changes of colors. Then quantitative prediction models for moisture content detection of withered tea leaves was established through linear PLS (Partial Least Squares) and non-linear SVM (Support Vector Machine). The results showed correlation coefficients higher than 0.8 between the water contents and green component mean value (G), lightness component mean value (L*) and uniformity (U), which means that the extracted characteristics have great potential to predict the water contents. The performance parameters as correlation coefficient of prediction set (Rp), root-mean-square error of prediction (RMSEP), and relative standard deviation (RPD) of the SVM prediction model are 0.9314, 0.0411 and 1.8004, respectively. The non-linear modeling method can better describe the quantitative analytical relations between the image and water content. With superior generalization and robustness, the method would provide a new train of thought and theoretical basis for the online water content monitoring technology of automated production of black tea.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29777147 PMCID: PMC5959864 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26165-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Correlation between image feature values and moisture content.
| parameter | Y | R | G | B | H | S | V | a* | b* | L* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 0.709** | 1 | 0.866** | 0.591** | −0.286 | −0.158 | 0.987** | 0.104 | −0.080 | 0.939** |
| G | 0.856** | 0.866** | 1 | 0.141 | 0.186 | 0.336 | 0.807** | −0.402 | 0.411 | 0.984** |
| B |
| 0.591** | 0.141 | 1 | −0.690** | −0.884** | 0.696** | 0.836** | −0.843** | 0.310 |
| H |
| −0.286 | 0.186 | −0.690** | 1 | 0.756** | −0.314 | −0.827** | 0.755** | 0.037 |
| S | 0.490* | −0.158 | 0.336 | −0.884** | 0.756** | 1 | −0.284 | −0.988** | 0.996** | 0.168 |
| V | 0.641** | 0.987** | 0.807** | 0.696** | −0.314 | −0.284 | 1 | 0.215 | −0.206 | 0.897** |
| a* | −0.560** | 0.104 | −0.402 | 0.836** | −0.827** | −0.988** | 0.215 | 1 | −0.993** | −0.236 |
| b* | 0.559** | −0.080 | 0.411 | −0.843** | 0.755** | 0.996** | −0.206 | −0.993** | 1 | 0.247 |
| L* | 0.860** | 0.939** | 0.984** | 0.310 | 0.037 | 0.168 | 0.897** | −0.236 | 0.247 | 1 |
| m | 0.641** | 0.987** | 0.807** | 0.696** | −0.314 | −0.284 | 1.000** | 0.215 | −0.206 | 0.897** |
| δ | 0.676** | 0.177 | 0.620** | −0.656** | 0.697** | 0.917** | 0.057 | −0.929** | 0.937** | 0.478* |
| r | 0.619** | 0.063 | 0.532** | −0.744** | 0.737** | 0.960** | −0.060 | −0.965** | 0.972** | 0.378 |
| μ3 |
| 0.495* | 0.416* | 0.068 | −0.414* | 0.115 | 0.389 | −0.028 | 0.128 | 0.431* |
| U | −0.840** | −0.517* | −0.859** | 0.322 | −0.553** | −0.712** | −0.424* | 0.763** | −0.763** | −0.765** |
| e | 0.837** | 0.423* | 0.806** | −0.421* | 0.631** | 0.783** | 0.325 | −0.829** | 0.827** | 0.695** |
Note: **Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level, *Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level.
Figure 1The changes of color (A) and texture (B) features with the different moisture content.
Figure 2Principal component selection (A) and scatter plot of prediction set (B).
Figure 3Model parameters optimization (A) and scatter plot of prediction set (B).
Results of different models for each prediction of moisture.
| Methods | NPC | Calibration set | Prediction set | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rc | RMSEC | Bias | Rp | RMSEP | Bias | SEP | CV | RPD | ||
| PLS | 5 | 0.8983 | 0.0821 | 0.0417 | 0.8349 | 0.0607 | 0.0262 | 0.0073 | 0.1086 | 0.9834 |
| BN | 5 | 0.9644 | 0.0352 | 0.0035 | 0.5968 | 0.0918 | 0.0005 | 0.0169 | 0.2026 | 1.1743 |
| BP-ANN | 4 | 0.9522 | 0.0364 | 0.0117 | 0.8949 | 0.0513 | 0.0198 | 0.0093 | 0.1381 | 1.6205 |
| SVM | 4 | 0.9838 | 0.0239 | 0.0011 | 0.9314 | 0.0411 | 0.0185 | 0.0091 | 0.1365 | 1.8004 |
| RF | 4 | 0.9858 | 0.0464 | 0.0003 | 0.9172 | 0.0472 | 0.0240 | 0.0121 | 0.1390 | 1.6379 |
BN, Bayesian Network; SD, standard deviation; NPC, used latent variables; RMSEC, root mean square error of calibration; RMSEP: root mean square error of prediction; SEP, standard error of prediction; CV, coefficient of variation; RPD, residual predictive deviation value of prediction.
Figure 4Flowchart of the algorithm employed for color and texture measurement.
Figure 5Computer image acquisition system physical drawing (1. Canon DS60D, Japan, 18MP; 2. Roller -distance; 3. Cambered uniform light; 4. Controller of Cambered uniform light; 5. Image processing system).