Literature DB >> 22759441

Analysis of co-occurrence texture statistics as a function of gray-level quantization for classifying breast ultrasound.

W Gomez1, W C A Pereira, A F C Infantosi.   

Abstract

In this paper, we investigated the behavior of 22 co-occurrence statistics combined to six gray-scale quantization levels to classify breast lesions on ultrasound (BUS) images. The database of 436 BUS images used in this investigation was formed by 217 carcinoma and 219 benign lesions images. The region delimited by a minimum bounding rectangle around the lesion was employed to calculate the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM). Next, 22 co-occurrence statistics were computed regarding six quantization levels (8, 16, 32, 64, 128, and 256), four orientations (0° , 45° , 90° , and 135°), and ten distances (1, 2,...,10 pixels). Also, to reduce feature space dimensionality, texture descriptors of the same distance were averaged over all orientations, which is a common practice in the literature. Thereafter, the feature space was ranked using mutual information technique with minimal-redundancy-maximal-relevance (mRMR) criterion. Fisher linear discriminant analysis (FLDA) was applied to assess the discrimination power of texture features, by adding the first m-ranked features to the classification procedure iteratively until all of them were considered. The area under ROC curve (AUC) was used as figure of merit to measure the performance of the classifier. It was observed that averaging texture descriptors of a same distance impacts negatively the classification performance, since the best AUC of 0.81 was achieved with 32 gray levels and 109 features. On the other hand, regarding the single texture features (i.e., without averaging procedure), the quantization level does not impact the discrimination power, since AUC = 0.87 was obtained for the six quantization levels. Moreover, the number of features was reduced (between 17 and 24 features). The texture descriptors that contributed notably to distinguish breast lesions were contrast and correlation computed from GLCMs with orientation of 90° and distance more than five pixels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22759441     DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2012.2206398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  29 in total

1.  Incorporating texture features in a computer-aided breast lesion diagnosis system for automated three-dimensional breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Haixia Liu; Tao Tan; Jan van Zelst; Ritse Mann; Nico Karssemeijer; Bram Platel
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-07-25

Review 2.  Ultrasound Imaging Technologies for Breast Cancer Detection and Management: A Review.

Authors:  Rongrong Guo; Guolan Lu; Binjie Qin; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Integrating patient symptoms, clinical readings, and radiologist feedback with computer-aided diagnosis system for detection of infectious pulmonary disease: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Tej Bahadur Chandra; Bikesh Kumar Singh; Deepak Jain
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 3.079

4.  Applying a Random Projection Algorithm to Optimize Machine Learning Model for Breast Lesion Classification.

Authors:  Morteza Heidari; Sivaramakrishnan Lakshmivarahan; Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Gopichandh Danala; Sai Kiran R Maryada; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 4.756

Review 5.  Quantification of heterogeneity as a biomarker in tumor imaging: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lejla Alic; Wiro J Niessen; Jifke F Veenland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Robust phase-based texture descriptor for classification of breast ultrasound images.

Authors:  Lingyun Cai; Xin Wang; Yuanyuan Wang; Yi Guo; Jinhua Yu; Yi Wang
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  A Selective Ensemble Classification Method Combining Mammography Images with Ultrasound Images for Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Jinyu Cong; Benzheng Wei; Yunlong He; Yilong Yin; Yuanjie Zheng
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 2.238

8.  A comparative study of machine learning methods for time-to-event survival data for radiomics risk modelling.

Authors:  Stefan Leger; Alex Zwanenburg; Karoline Pilz; Fabian Lohaus; Annett Linge; Klaus Zöphel; Jörg Kotzerke; Andreas Schreiber; Inge Tinhofer; Volker Budach; Ali Sak; Martin Stuschke; Panagiotis Balermpas; Claus Rödel; Ute Ganswindt; Claus Belka; Steffi Pigorsch; Stephanie E Combs; David Mönnich; Daniel Zips; Mechthild Krause; Michael Baumann; Esther G C Troost; Steffen Löck; Christian Richter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  COVID-19 discrimination framework for X-ray images by considering radiomics, selective information, feature ranking, and a novel hybrid classifier.

Authors:  Hasan Koyuncu; Mücahid Barstuğan
Journal:  Signal Process Image Commun       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.256

10.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis with Deep Learning Architecture: Applications to Breast Lesions in US Images and Pulmonary Nodules in CT Scans.

Authors:  Jie-Zhi Cheng; Dong Ni; Yi-Hong Chou; Jing Qin; Chui-Mei Tiu; Yeun-Chung Chang; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Dinggang Shen; Chung-Ming Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.