Literature DB >> 29775409

Transactivation domain of p53 regulates DNA repair and integrity in human iPS cells.

Ramaswamy Kannappan1, Saidulu Mattapally1, Pooja A Wagle1, Jianyi Zhang1.   

Abstract

The role of p53 transactivation domain (p53-TAD), a multifunctional and dynamic domain, on DNA repair and retaining DNA integrity in human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) has never been studied. p53-TAD was knocked out in iPSCs using CRISPR/Cas9 and was confirmed by DNA sequencing. p53-TAD knockout (KO) cells were characterized by accelerated proliferation, decreased population doubling time, and unaltered Bcl-2, Bcl-2-binding component 3, insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor, and Bax and altered Mdm2, p21, and p53-induced death domain transcript expression. In p53-TAD KO cells, the p53-regulated DNA repair proteins xeroderma pigmentosum group A, DNA polymerase H, and DNA-binding protein 2 expression were found to be reduced compared with p53 wild-type cells. Exposure to a low dose of doxorubicin (Doxo) induced similar DNA damage and DNA damage response (DDR) as measured by RAD50 and MRE11 expression, checkpoint kinase 2 activation, and γH2A.X recruitment at DNA strand breaks in both cell groups, indicating that silence of p53-TAD does not affect the DDR mechanism upstream of p53. After removal of Doxo, p53 wild-type hiPSCs underwent DNA repair, corrected their damaged DNA, and restored DNA integrity. Conversely, p53-TAD KO hiPSCs did not undergo complete DNA repair and failed to restore DNA integrity. More importantly, continuous culture of p53-TAD KO hiPSCs underwent G2/M cell cycle arrest and expressed the cellular senescent marker p16INK4a. Our data clearly show that silence of the TAD of p53 did not affect DDR but affected the DNA repair process, implying the crucial role of p53-TAD in maintaining DNA integrity. Therefore, activating p53-TAD domain using small molecules may promote DNA repair and integrity of cells and prevent cellular senescence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA repair; cellular senescence; human induced pluripotent stem cells; p53

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29775409      PMCID: PMC6172637          DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00160.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  36 in total

1.  Definition of the p53 functional domains necessary for inducing apoptosis.

Authors:  J Zhu; S Zhang; J Jiang; X Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-12-22       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  DNA repair, genome stability, and aging.

Authors:  David B Lombard; Katrin F Chua; Raul Mostoslavsky; Sonia Franco; Monica Gostissa; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Induced pluripotent stem cells: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Keisuke Okita; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Damage to DNA by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species: role in inflammatory disease and progression to cancer.

Authors:  H Wiseman; B Halliwell
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 5.  The role of tetramerization in p53 function.

Authors:  P Chène
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2001-05-10       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 6.  Regulation of autophagy and EMT by the interplay between p53 and RAS during cancer progression (Review).

Authors:  Xiaofei Zhang; Qian Cheng; Huijing Yin; Gong Yang
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.650

7.  Pterygium and genetic polymorphisms of the DNA repair enzymes XRCC1, XPA, and XPD.

Authors:  Chun-Chi Chiang; Yi-Yu Tsai; Da-Tian Bau; Ya-Wen Cheng; Sung-Huei Tseng; Rou-Fen Wang; Fuu-Jen Tsai
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.367

8.  The comet assay, DNA damage, DNA repair and cytotoxicity: hedgehogs are not always dead.

Authors:  Yolanda Lorenzo; Solange Costa; Andrew R Collins; Amaya Azqueta
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 9.  Oxidative and alkylating damage in DNA.

Authors:  Glaucia R Martinez; Ana Paula M Loureiro; Sabrina A Marques; Sayuri Miyamoto; Lydia F Yamaguchi; Janice Onuki; Eduardo A Almeida; Camila C M Garcia; Lívea F Barbosa; Marisa H G Medeiros; Paolo Di Mascio
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 10.  The p53 family orchestrates the regulation of metabolism: physiological regulation and implications for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Marco Napoli; Elsa R Flores
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  DNA damage-free iPS cells exhibit potential to yield competent cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Jessica M Miller; Nikhil M Mardhekar; Danielle Pretorius; Prasanna Krishnamurthy; Namakkal Soorappan Rajasekaran; Jianyi Zhang; Ramaswamy Kannappan
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 2.  At the Crossroads of Life and Death: The Proteins That Influence Cell Fate Decisions.

Authors:  Vinesh Dhokia; John A Y Moss; Salvador Macip; Joanna L Fox
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Assessing Stem Cell DNA Integrity for Cardiac Cell Therapy.

Authors:  Jessica M Miller; Nikhil Maneesh Mardhekar; Vasanthi Rajasekaran; Jianyi Zhang; Ram Kannappan
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Functionally Competent DNA Damage-Free Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes for Myocardial Repair.

Authors:  Ramaswamy Kannappan; James F Turner; Jessica M Miller; Chengming Fan; Amanda G Rushdi; Namakkal Soorappan Rajasekaran; Jianyi Zhang
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 29.690

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.