Literature DB >> 29774956

Cement interface and bone stress in total hip arthroplasty: Relationship to head size.

Teresa Alonso-Rasgado1, Jose F Del-Valle-Mojica1, David Jimenez-Cruz1, Colin G Bailey2, Tim N Board3.   

Abstract

The use of larger prosthetic femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has increased considerably in recent years in response to the need to improve joint stability and reduce risk of dislocation. However, data suggests larger femoral heads are associated with higher joint failure rates. For cemented implants, ensuring the continued integrity of the cement mantle is key to long term fixation. This paper describes an investigation into the effect of variation in femoral head size on stresses in the acetabular cement mantle and pelvic bone. Three commonly used femoral head sizes: 28, 32, and 36 mm diameter were investigated. The study was undertaken using a finite element model validated using surface strains obtained from Digital Image Correlation (DIC) during experimentation on a composite hemipelvis implanted with a cemented all-polyethylene acetabular cup. Following validation, the models were used to investigate stresses in the pelvic bone and acetabular cement mantle resulting from two loading scenarios; an average weight subject (700 N) and an overweight subject (1,000 N) undertaking a single leg stand. We found that the highest peak stresses occurred in the anterosuperior and posterosuperior regions of the bone-cement interface, in the line of action of the load, where debonding usually initiates. Stress on the cortical bone-cement interface increased with femoral head diameter by up to 9% whilst stresses in the trabecular bone remained relatively invariant. Our findings may help to explain higher joint failure rates associated with larger femoral heads.
© 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:2966-2977, 2018. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cement mantle; femoral head; finite element; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29774956     DOI: 10.1002/jor.24052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  3 in total

1.  Zeroth-order finite similitude and scaling of complex geometries in biomechanical experimentation.

Authors:  Raul Ochoa-Cabrero; Teresa Alonso-Rasgado; Keith Davey
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  In Revision THA, Is the Re-revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Wayne Hoskins; Sophia Rainbird; Chelsea Dyer; Stephen E Graves; Roger Bingham
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Design of a Novel Trabecular Acetabular Cup and Selective Laser Melting Fabrication.

Authors:  Congyu Wang; Baoyu Sun; Yongdi Zhang; Congwei Wang; Guang Yang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 3.748

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.