Taylor P Kohn1, Samuel J Ohlander2, Jake S Jacob1, Tina M Griffin3, Larry I Lipshultz4,5, Alexander W Pastuszak6,7,8. 1. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. 2. Department of Urology, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Library of Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 4. Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. 5. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. 6. Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. pastusza@bcm.edu. 7. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. pastusza@bcm.edu. 8. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, 6624 Fannin Street, Suite 1700, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. pastusza@bcm.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Current guidelines recommend against surgical repair of subclinical varicoceles (SCVs) for infertility; several studies demonstrate mixed fertility results after SCV correction. To determine whether surgical correction of SCV improves semen parameters and/or reproductive outcomes, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Seven biomedical literature databases were searched through January 2018 for studies that assessed reproductive outcomes and/or change in semen parameters in men with corrected SCV compared to either (1) uncorrected SCV or (2) corrected clinical varicocele. Estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. RECENT FINDINGS: Data were extracted from 13 studies involving 1357 men. Overall, the risk of bias for included studies was high and without a consistent SCV definition across studies. Surgical correction of SCV was associated with a minor increase in sperm density and total motile sperm count (TMSC) compared to uncorrected SCV. This increase in semen parameters is not clinically significant, as men prior to varicocelectomy were on average normospermic nor was correction of a SCV associated with an increase in pregnancy rates when compared to men with uncorrected SCV. Comparing corrected SCV to corrected clinical varicocele, SCV correction resulted in a smaller increase in TMSC but no difference in average annual pregnancy rate. The risk of bias within and heterogeneity between studies assessing SCV correction are high, yet overall very little clinical benefit is derived from SCV correction.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Current guidelines recommend against surgical repair of subclinical varicoceles (SCVs) for infertility; several studies demonstrate mixed fertility results after SCV correction. To determine whether surgical correction of SCV improves semen parameters and/or reproductive outcomes, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Seven biomedical literature databases were searched through January 2018 for studies that assessed reproductive outcomes and/or change in semen parameters in men with corrected SCV compared to either (1) uncorrected SCV or (2) corrected clinical varicocele. Estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. RECENT FINDINGS: Data were extracted from 13 studies involving 1357 men. Overall, the risk of bias for included studies was high and without a consistent SCV definition across studies. Surgical correction of SCV was associated with a minor increase in sperm density and total motile sperm count (TMSC) compared to uncorrected SCV. This increase in semen parameters is not clinically significant, as men prior to varicocelectomy were on average normospermic nor was correction of a SCV associated with an increase in pregnancy rates when compared to men with uncorrected SCV. Comparing corrected SCV to corrected clinical varicocele, SCV correction resulted in a smaller increase in TMSC but no difference in average annual pregnancy rate. The risk of bias within and heterogeneity between studies assessing SCV correction are high, yet overall very little clinical benefit is derived from SCV correction.
Authors: J C Trussell; Gregory M Christman; Dana A Ohl; Richard S Legro; Stephen A Krawetz; Peter J Snyder; Pasquale Patrizio; Alex J Polotsky; Michael P Diamond; Peter R Casson; Christos Coutifaris; Kurt Barnhart; Robert G Brzyski; William D Schlaff; Randall Meacham; David Shin; Tracey Thomas; Meizhuo Zhang; Nanette Santoro; Esther Eisenberg; Heping Zhang Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: A Ferlin; A E Calogero; C Krausz; F Lombardo; D Paoli; R Rago; C Scarica; M Simoni; C Foresta; V Rochira; E Sbardella; S Francavilla; G Corona Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Patricia S Cho; Richard N Yu; Harriet J Paltiel; Matthew A Migliozzi; Xiaoran Li; Alyssia Venna; David A Diamond Journal: Asian J Androl Date: 2021 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.285