Literature DB >> 29774412

Hybrid constructs pedicle screw with apical sublaminar bands versus pedicle screws only for surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Matteo Palmisani1, Eugenio Dema2, Stefano Cervellati2, Rosa Palmisani2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the 2-year minimum postoperative results of posterior correction and spinal arthrodesis using translational correction with hybrid (sublaminar bands on concave side and pedicle screw) constructs versus correction with intermediate density pedicle screw-only constructs in the treatment of AIS (Lenke 1).
METHODS: A total of 37 patients with AIS at single institutions who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis pedicle screw with sublaminar bands at the apex (19 patients) (Group A) or pedicle screw-only (18) constructs (Group B) were selected and matched according to similar age at surgery 13.8 years (Group A) and 14.3 years (Group B), similar arthrodesis area 12.3 (Group A) and 11.5 (Group B), all curves Lenke type 1 with similar pre-op curve 54° (Group A) and 57° (Group B). Patients were evaluated pre-op, immediately post-op, and at min 2-year follow-up according to radiographic curve correction, operating time, intraoperative blood loss, and f.u. loss of correction.
RESULTS: The average curve correction was 65.6% in sublaminar group and 68% in pedicle screw group. At 2-year follow-up, loss of the major curve correction was 2% in sublaminar group compared to 3% in pedicle screw group. Postoperative coronal and sagittal balance was similar in both groups. Operating time averaged 200 min (Group A) and 180 min (Group B). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly different in both groups 700 ± 160 cc in sublaminar group and 630 ± 150 cc in pedicle screw group. There were no neurologic complications in both groups.
CONCLUSION: The two groups offer similar curve correction without neurologic complications in the surgical treatment of AIS (Lenke 1). The use of sublaminar bands on the apex (concave side) can be a valid fixation in the presence of hypoplastic pedicle, can reduce the thoracic hypokyphosis and derotate the vertebra but had more blood loss comparing to pedicle screws alone. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Pedicle screw; Sublaminar bands; Surgical correction

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29774412     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5625-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  23 in total

1.  Coronal and sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw constructs.

Authors:  Jason E Lowenstein; Hiroko Matsumoto; Michael G Vitale; Mark Weidenbaum; Jaime A Gomez; Francis Young-In Lee; Joshua E Hyman; David P Roye
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Outcome-based classification for assessment of thoracic pedicular screw placement.

Authors:  Bidre N Upendra; Devkant Meena; Buddhadev Chowdhury; Abrar Ahmad; Arvind Jayaswal
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  How much correction is enough?

Authors:  Robert B Winter; John E Lonstein; Francis Denis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  L G Lenke; R R Betz; J Harms; K H Bridwell; D H Clements; T G Lowe; K Blanke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  A pedicle screw construct gives an enhanced posterior correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis when compared with other constructs: myth or reality.

Authors:  Vagmin Vora; Alvin Crawford; Nadir Babekhir; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Lawrence Lenke; Melissa Peskin; Gina Charles; Yongjung Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Difficult thoracic pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Hakan Senaran; Suken A Shah; Peter G Gabos; Aaron G Littleton; Geraldine Neiss; James T Guille
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2008-05

7.  Estimation of patient dose and associated radiogenic risks from fluoroscopically guided pedicle screw insertion.

Authors:  Kostas Perisinakis; Nicholas Theocharopoulos; John Damilakis; Pavlos Katonis; George Papadokostakis; Alexandros Hadjipavlou; Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Efficacy and safety of posteromedial translation for correction of thoracic curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a new connection to the spine: the Universal Clamp.

Authors:  Keyvan Mazda; Brice Ilharreborde; Julien Even; Yan Lefevre; Franck Fitoussi; Georges-François Penneçot
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Yongjung J Kim; Lawrence G Lenke; Samuel K Cho; Keith H Bridwell; Brenda Sides; Kathy Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Comparison of novel ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene tape versus conventional metal wire for sublaminar segmental fixation in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Masahiko Takahata; Manabu Ito; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Yoshihisa Kotani; Hideki Sudo; Shigeki Ohshima; Akio Minami
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2007-08
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Comparative radiological outcomes and complications of sacral-2-alar iliac screw versus iliac screw for sacropelvic fixation.

Authors:  Ziwei Gao; Xun Sun; Chao Chen; Zhaowei Teng; Baoshan Xu; Xinlong Ma; Zheng Wang; Qiang Yang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Sublaminar polyester bands for the correction of idiopathic and neuromuscular scoliosis.

Authors:  Federico Canavese; Antoine Samba
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-01

3.  Do the benefits of hook-hybrid construct justify their use over all-pedicle screws constructs in maintaining postoperative curve correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients from an Asian population?

Authors:  Samuel Wei Han Tan; Graham S Goh; Lei Jiang; Reuben Chee Cheong Soh
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-03-08

4.  Three-dimensional analysis of spinal deformity correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of two distinct techniques.

Authors:  Jakub Sikora-Klak; Vidyadhar V Upasani; Brice Ilharreborde; Madeline Cross; Tracey P Bastrom; Keyvan Mazda; Burt Yaszay; Peter O Newton
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Surgical treatment of spinal deformities in Marfan syndrome: Long-term follow-up results using different instrumentations.

Authors:  Matteo Palmisani; Eugenio Dema; Alessandro Rava; Rosa Palmisani; Massimo Girardo; Stefano Cervellati
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

6.  Three-dimensional morphological analysis of the thoracic pedicle and related radiographic factors in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Tatsuya Sato; Hidetoshi Nojiri; Takatoshi Okuda; Kei Miyagawa; Nozomu Kobayashi; Ryosuke Takahashi; Arihisa Shimura; Shota Tamagawa; Yukoh Ohara; Takeshi Hara; Muneaki Ishijima
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.562

7.  Sublaminar fixation versus hooks and pedicle screws in scoliosis surgery for Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Alessandro Rava; Eugenio Dema; Matteo Palmisani; Rosa Palmisani; Stefano Cervellati; Massimo Girardo
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2020-04-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.