Michael Bietenbeck1, Anca Florian1, Zornitsa Shomanova1, Claudia Meier1, Ali Yilmaz2. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Münster, Germany. 2. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Münster, Germany. ali.yilmaz@ukmuenster.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients suffering from dilative or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (DCM/HCM). To assess CMD, quantitative myocardial first-pass perfusion (1P) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can be performed. Coronary sinus flow (CSF) measurements at rest and during maximal vasodilatation are an alternative and well-validated approach for the quantification of global myocardial blood flow (MBF) in CMR. METHODS: Global myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) was used to compare both methods, 1P and CSF. This measure reflects the ratio of myocardial blood flow during maximal coronary vasodilatation over rest. 1P-MPR and CSF-MPR were calculated in 17 HCM patients, 14 DCM patients and 16 controls, who underwent a stress CMR study to rule out obstructive coronary artery disease. All patients were examined on a 1.5-T system and the study protocol comprised both, first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and velocity-encoded (VENC) phase-contrast imaging of CSF during rest and adenosine stress. RESULTS: 1P-MPR was significantly decreased only in HCM patients compared to controls (1.14 vs. 1.43, p = 0.045) whereas CSF-MPR was significantly reduced in both patient groups, HCM and DCM, compared to controls (2.38 and 2.07 vs. 3.18, p = 0.041 and p = 0.032). CSF-MBF at maximal stress was significantly lower in HCM and DCM patients compared to the control group (0.11 and 1.23 vs. 1.58 ml/min/g, p = 0.008 and p = 0.040). A moderate but significant correlation between CSF-MPR and 1P-MPR was observed (r = 0.39, p = 0.011). A negative correlation between LV wall thickness and CSF-MBF at rest and stress was found in the DCM group using VENC-based CSF measurements (r = - 0.64, p = 0.013 and r = - 0.69, p = 0.006)-but not using 1P-MPI. Post-proceeding analysis regarding 1P-MPR and CSF-MPR measurements required 20.1 and 6.5 min, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The presence of microvascular disease can be non-invasively and quickly detected by VENC-based CSF-MPR measurements during routine stress perfusion CMR in both HCM and DCM patients. Compared to conventional 1P-MPI, VENC-based CSF-MPR is particularly useful in DCM patients with thinned ventricular walls.
BACKGROUND:Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients suffering from dilative or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (DCM/HCM). To assess CMD, quantitative myocardial first-pass perfusion (1P) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can be performed. Coronary sinus flow (CSF) measurements at rest and during maximal vasodilatation are an alternative and well-validated approach for the quantification of global myocardial blood flow (MBF) in CMR. METHODS: Global myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) was used to compare both methods, 1P and CSF. This measure reflects the ratio of myocardial blood flow during maximal coronary vasodilatation over rest. 1P-MPR and CSF-MPR were calculated in 17 HCM patients, 14 DCMpatients and 16 controls, who underwent a stress CMR study to rule out obstructive coronary artery disease. All patients were examined on a 1.5-T system and the study protocol comprised both, first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and velocity-encoded (VENC) phase-contrast imaging of CSF during rest and adenosine stress. RESULTS: 1P-MPR was significantly decreased only in HCM patients compared to controls (1.14 vs. 1.43, p = 0.045) whereas CSF-MPR was significantly reduced in both patient groups, HCM and DCM, compared to controls (2.38 and 2.07 vs. 3.18, p = 0.041 and p = 0.032). CSF-MBF at maximal stress was significantly lower in HCM and DCMpatients compared to the control group (0.11 and 1.23 vs. 1.58 ml/min/g, p = 0.008 and p = 0.040). A moderate but significant correlation between CSF-MPR and 1P-MPR was observed (r = 0.39, p = 0.011). A negative correlation between LV wall thickness and CSF-MBF at rest and stress was found in the DCM group using VENC-based CSF measurements (r = - 0.64, p = 0.013 and r = - 0.69, p = 0.006)-but not using 1P-MPI. Post-proceeding analysis regarding 1P-MPR and CSF-MPR measurements required 20.1 and 6.5 min, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The presence of microvascular disease can be non-invasively and quickly detected by VENC-based CSF-MPR measurements during routine stress perfusion CMR in both HCM and DCMpatients. Compared to conventional 1P-MPI, VENC-based CSF-MPR is particularly useful in DCMpatients with thinned ventricular walls.
Authors: Jonathan R Panting; Peter D Gatehouse; Guang-Zhong Yang; Frank Grothues; David N Firmin; Peter Collins; Dudley J Pennell Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-06-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Grigorios Chatzantonis; Michael Bietenbeck; Anca Florian; Claudia Meier; Dennis Korthals; Holger Reinecke; Ali Yilmaz Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2019-07-18 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Barbara Kutryb-Zajac; Patrycja Jablonska; Marcin Serocki; Alicja Bulinska; Paulina Mierzejewska; Daniela Friebe; Christina Alter; Agnieszka Jasztal; Romuald Lango; Jan Rogowski; Rafal Bartoszewski; Ewa M Slominska; Stefan Chlopicki; Jürgen Schrader; Magdi H Yacoub; Ryszard T Smolenski Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Grigorios Chatzantonis; Michael Bietenbeck; Anca Florian; Claudia Meier; Philipp Stalling; Dennis Korthals; Holger Reinecke; Ali Yilmaz Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2020-05-05 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Stefanos Drakos; Grigorios Chatzantonis; Michael Bietenbeck; Georg Evers; Arik Bernard Schulze; Michael Mohr; Helena Fonfara; Claudia Meier; Ali Yilmaz Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 4.379